Four different studies provide evidence to support the validity of the Bible Verse Selection Task (BVST) as a measure of the strength of Christian fundamentalist beliefs by showing correlations between BVST scores and measures of negativity toward people who often represent “outgroups” for Christians. That is, respondents who obtained high scores on the BVST (representing a greater tendency to select biblical passages associated with fundamentalism as most central to their faith or belief system) also showed a tendency to obtain high scores on measures of negative feelings, beliefs, behaviors, and attitudes toward atheists, gay men, lesbian women, and Muslims. These relationships were generally consistent across both Christian-only samples and general samples, with statistically significant coefficients obtained for 30 of 32 predicted correlations. These results support the utility of this scale for research purposes.
AlmondG. A.ApplebyR. S.SivanE. (2003). Strong religions: The rise of fundamentalisms around the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BeckR.HaugenA. D. (2013). The Christian religion: A theological and psychological review. In PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W. (eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality: Vol. 1. Context, theory, and research (pp. 697–711). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14045-039
3.
BellerJ.KroegerC. (2018). Religiosity, religious fundamentalism, and perceived threat as predictors of Muslim support for extremist violence. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(4), 345–55. http://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000138
4.
BlogowskaJ.SaroglouV. (2013). For better or worse: Fundamntalists’ attitudes toward outgroups as a function of exposure to authoritative religious texts. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 23(2), 103–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2012.687991
5.
BrandtM. K.Van TongerenD. (2017). People both high and low on religious fundamentalism are prejudiced toward dissimilar groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000076
6.
BuhrmesterM. D.TalaifarS.GoslingS. D. (2018). An evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 149–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706516
7.
BurnhamM. J.YenK. L.PiedmontR. L. (2018). Who is MTurk? Personal characteristics and sample consistency of these online workers. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 21(9–10), 934–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1486394
8.
CaslerK.BickelL.HackettE. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
9.
ColmanD. E.VineyardJ.LetzringT. D. (2018). Exploring beyond simple demographic variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 133(15), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.023
10.
CunninghamG. B.MeltonN. (2012). Prejudice against lesbian, gay, and bisexual coaches: The influence of race, religious fundamentalism, modern sexism, and contact with sexual minorities. Sociology of Sport Journal, 29(3), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.29.3.283
11.
CunninghamG. B.MeltonN. (2013). The moderating effects of contact with lesbian and gay friends on the relationships among religious fundamentalism, sexism, and sexual prejudice. Journal of Sex Research, 50(3–4), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.648029
12.
FordT. E.BrignallT.VanValeyT. L.MacalusoM. J. (2009). The unmaking of prejudice: How Christian beliefs relate to attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(1), 146–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01434.x
13.
GervaisW. M. (2011). Finding the faithless: Perceived atheist prevalence reduces anti-atheist prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 543–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211399583
14.
GervaisW. M. (2013). In godlessness we distrust: Using social psychology to solve the puzzle of anti-atheist prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Compass, 7(6), 366–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12035
15.
GribbinsT. (2012). The effects of religious fundamentalism and threat on prejudice. (Publication No. 885201673) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri—St. Louis]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global
16.
HillE. D.TerrellH. K.CohenA. B.NagoshiC. T. (2010). The role of social cognition in the religious fundamentalism–prejudice relationship. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(4), 724–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01542.x
17.
HofshiD. B. (2017). “…Not that there’s anything wrong with that”: Differences in what we say and how we feel about lesbians and gay men [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Adelphi University.
18.
HughesJ.GrossmanI.CohenA. B. (2015). Tolerating the “doubting Thomas”: How centrality of religious beliefs vs. practices influences prejudice against atheists. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01352
19.
JamesW.GriffithsB.PedersenA. (2011). The “making and unmaking” of prejudice against Australian Muslims and gay men and lesbians: The role of religious development and fundamentalism. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21(3), 212–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2011.581579
20.
JonathanE. (2008). The influence of religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and Christian orthodoxy on explicit and implicit measures of attitudes toward homosexuals. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18(4), 316–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508610802229262
21.
KossowskaM.SzwedP.Czernatowicz-KukuczkaA.SekerdejM.WyczesanyM. (2017). From threat to relief: Expressing prejudice toward atheists as a self-regulatory strategy protecting the religious orthodox from threat. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 873. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00873
22.
KunstJ. R.ThomsenL.SamD. L. (2014). Late Abrahamic reunion? Religious fundamentalism negatively predicts dual Abrahamic categorization among Muslims and Christians. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 337–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2014
23.
LeeS. A.GibbonsJ. A.ThompsonJ. M.TimaniH. S. (2009). The Islamophobia Scale: Instrument development and initial validation. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19(2), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508610802711137
24.
LeeS. A.ReidC. A.ShortS. D.GibbonsJ. A.YehR.CampbellM. L. (2013). Fear of Muslims: Psychometric evaluation of the Islamophobia Scale. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(3), 157–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032117
25.
LewisA. R.DjupeP. A.MockabeeS. T.WuJ. S. Y. (2015). The (non)religion of Mechanical Turk workers. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 54(2), 419–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12184
26.
MellingerC.LevantR. F. (2014). Moderators of the relationship between masculinity and sexual prejudice in men: Friendship, gender self-esteem, same-sex attraction, and religious fundamentalism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 519–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0220-z
RouseS. V.HaasH. A.LammertB. C.EastmanK. D. (2019). Same book, different bookmarks: The development and preliminary validation of the Bible Verse Selection task as a measure of Christian fundamentalism. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 47(4), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091647118810789
29.
RowattW. C.FranklinL. M.CottonM. (2005). Patterns and personality correlates of implicit and explicit attitudes toward Christians and Muslims. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00263.x
30.
RowattW. C.TsangJ.KellyJ.LaMartinaB.MccullersM.McKinleyA. (2006). Associations between religious personality dimensions and implicit homosexual prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(3), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00314.x
31.
SimpsonA.RiosK. (2016). How do U.S. Christians and atheists stereotype one another’s moral values?International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(4), 320–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2016.1167419
32.
SimpsonA.RiosK. (2017). The moral contents of anti-atheist prejudice (and why atheists should care about it). European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2219
33.
WilliamsonW. P.HoodR. W.Jr. (2014). Religious fundamentalism and perceived threat: A report from an experimental study. Mental Health, Religion, & Culture, 17(5), 520–28. http://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2013.857297
34.
WrightL. W.Jr.AdamsH. E.BernatJ. (1999). Development and validation of the Homophobia Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21(4), 337–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022172816258
35.
WuthnowR.LawsonM. P. (2004). Sources of Christian fundamentalism in the United States. In MartyM. E.ApplebyR. S. (eds.), The fundamentalism project: Vol. 4. Accounting for fundamentalism: The dynamic character of movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
