The current study sought to investigate the relationship between benevolent sexism, gender role ideologies, and well-being in Evangelical men. Despite recent research that has established a relationship between restrictive gender beliefs and negative outcomes for women, few studies have addressed the relationship between these variables in men. Furthermore, Evangelical men’s specific experience has not been explored, in spite of religiosity’s association with these beliefs. Therefore, this study directly assessed relationship between well-being and two kinds of restrictive gender beliefs (i.e., benevolent sexism and traditional gender role ideology) in a sample of Evangelical men. Results showed that endorsement of benevolent sexism and traditional gender role ideology were related to lower levels of eudaimonic well-being for this population. Additionally, it was found that different patterns of relationship exist between restrictive gender beliefs and the two kinds of well-being: eudaimonic well-being (e.g., purpose and meaning) and hedonic well-being (e.g., pleasure and satisfaction) for this population. Specifically, the negative relationships with eudaimonic well-being were stronger than the negative relationships with aspects of hedonic well-being.
AliS. R.MahmoodA.MoelJ.HudsonC.LeathersL. (2008). A qualitative investigation of Muslim and Christian women’s views of religion and feminism in their lives. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 38–46. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.14.1.38.
2.
BakerE. H.SanchezL. A.NockS. L.WrightJ. D. (2009). Covenant marriage and the sanctification of gendered marital roles. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 147–178. doi:10.1177/0192513X08324109.
3.
BarretoM.EllemersN.PiebingaL.MoyaM. (2010). How nice of us and how dumb of me: The effect of exposure to benevolent sexism on women’s task and relational self-descriptions. Sex Roles, 62, 532–544. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9699-0.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.AakerJ. L.GarbinskyE. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 505–516. doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.830764.
5.
BemS. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.
6.
BurnS. M.BussoJ. (2005). Ambivalent sexism, scriptural literalism, and religiosity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 412–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00241.x.
7.
CalogeroR. M.JostJ. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 211–228. doi:10.1037/a0021864.
8.
CasadB. J.SalazarM. M.MacinaV. (2015). The real versus the ideal: Predicting relationship satisfaction and well-being from endorsement of marriage myths and benevolent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 119–129. doi:10.1177/0361684314528304.
9.
CrespoR. F.MesuradoB. (2015). Happiness economics, eudaimonia and positive psychology: From happiness economics to flourishing economics. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 931–946. doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9541-4.
10.
DardenneB.DumontM.BollierT. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764.
11.
DienerE.EmmonsR.LarsenJ.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
12.
DienerE.HelliwellJ. F.KahnemanD. (2010). International Differences in Well-being. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.001.0001.
13.
DienerE.SapytaJ. J.SuhE. (1998). Subjective well-being is essential to well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 33–37. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0901_3.
14.
DumontM.SarletM.DardenneB. (2010). Be too kind to a woman, she’ll feel incompetent: Benevolent sexism shifts self-construal and autobiographical memories toward incompetence. Sex Roles, 62, 545–553. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9582-4.
15.
DuránM.MoyaM.MegíasJ. L. (2014). Benevolent sexist ideology attributed to an abusive partner decreases women’s active coping responses to acts of sexual violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 1380–1401. doi:10.1177/0886260513507134.
16.
GauntR. (2012). ‘Blessed is he who has not made me a woman’: Ambivalent sexism and Jewish religiosity. Sex Roles, 67, 477–487. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0185-8.
17.
GlickP.FiskeS.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
18.
GlickP.LameirasM.CastroY. R. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433–441. doi:10.1023/A:1021696209949.
19.
HammondM. D.SibleyC. G. (2011). Why are benevolent sexists happier?Sex Roles, 65, 332–343. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0017-2.
20.
HidegI.FerrisD. L. (2016). The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexism promotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 706–727. doi:10.1037/pspi0000072.
21.
HuntK.SweetingH.KeoghanM.PlattS. (2006). Sex, gender role orientation, gender role attitudes and suicidal thoughts in three generations: A general population study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41, 641–647. doi:10.1007/s00127-006-0074-y.
22.
HusnuS. (2016). The role of ambivalent sexism and religiosity in predicting attitudes toward childlessness in Muslim undergraduate students. Sex Roles, 75, 573–582. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0639-5.
23.
HutaV. (2013). Pursuing eudaimonia versus hedonia: Distinctions, similarities, and relationships. In WatermanA. S. (ed.), The Best within Us: Positive Psychology Perspectives on Eudaimonia (pp. 139–158). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14092-00.
24.
JoshanlooM. (2016). Revisiting the empirical distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being using exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2023–2036. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9683-z.
25.
KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (1999). Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Found.
26.
KulikL. (2006). Personality profiles, life satisfaction and gender-role ideology among couples in late adulthood: The Israeli case. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 317–329. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.026.
27.
LarsenK. S.LongE. (1988). Attitudes toward sex roles: Traditional or egalitarian?Sex Roles, 19, 1–12. doi:10.1007/BF00292459.
28.
McMahanE. A.EstesD. (2011). Hedonic versus eudaimonic conceptions of well-being: Evidence of differential associations with self-reported well-being. Social Indicators Research, 103, 93–108. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9698-0.
29.
MikołajczakM.PietrzakJ. (2014). Ambivalent sexism and religion: Connected through values. Sex Roles, 70, 387–399. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0379-3.
30.
MontañésP.de LemusS.BohnerG.MegíasJ. L.MoyaM.Garcia-RetameroR. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of benevolent sexism from mothers to daughters and its relation to daughters’ academic performance and goals. Sex Roles, 66, 468–478. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0116-0.
31.
O’NeilJ. M. (2008). Summarizing 25 years of research on men’s gender role conflict using the Gender Role Conflict Scale: New research paradigms and clinical implications. The Counseling Psychologist, 26, 358–445.
32.
O’NeilJ. M.WesterS. R.HeesackerM.SnowdenS. J. (2017). Masculinity as a heuristic: Gender role conflict theory, superorganisms, and system-level thinking. In LevantR. F.WongY. J.LevantR. F.WongY. J. (eds.), The Psychology of Men and Masculinities (pp. 75–103). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/0000023-004.
33.
PavotW.DienerE. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.
34.
PetersonC.ParkN.SeligmanM. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41. doi:10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z.
35.
ReadS.GrundyE. (2011). Mental health among older married couples: The role of gender and family life. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 46, 331–341. doi:10.1007/s00127-010-0205-3.
36.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.
37.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.
38.
RyffC. D. (2013). Eudaimonic well-being and health: Mapping consequences of self-realization. In WatermanA. S. (ed.), The Best within Us: Positive Psychology Perspectives on Eudaimonia (pp. 77–98). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14092-005.
39.
RyffC. D.KeyesC. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.
40.
SanchezD. T.FetterolfJ. C.RudmanL. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 168–183. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.653699.
41.
SaundersK. J.Kashubeck-WestS. (2006). The relations among feminist identity development, gender-role orientation, and psychological well-being in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 199–211. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00282.x.
42.
SeligmanM. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York: Free Press.
43.
ShepherdM.ErchullM. J.RosnerA.TaubenbergerL.QueenE. F.McKeeJ. (2011). “I’ll get that for you”: The relationship between benevolent sexism and body self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 64, 1–8. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9859-2.
44.
StevensonR. F. (2015). Predictors of ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women in a Latter-Day Saint (LDS) adult sample: A test of Glick and Fiske’s ambivalent sexism theory (doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 76(3-A)(E).
45.
SteigerJ. H. (1980). Test for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245.
46.
SweetingH.BhaskarA.BenzevalM.PophamF.HuntK. (2014). Changing gender roles and attitudes and their implications for well-being around the new millennium. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49, 791–809. doi:10.1007/s00127-013-0730-y.
47.
TaşdemirN.Sakallı-UğurluN. (2010). The relationships between ambivalent sexism and religiosity among Turkish university students. Sex Roles, 62, 420–426. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9693-6.
48.
TurbanD. B.YanW. (2016). Relationship of eudaimonia and hedonia with work outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31, 1006–1020. doi:10.1108/JMP-07-2015-0271\.
49.
Van de VijverF. R. (2007). Cultural and gender differences in gender-role beliefs, sharing household task and child-care responsibilities, and well-being among immigrants and majority members in the Netherlands. Sex Roles, 57, 813–824. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9316-z.
50.
VittersøJ.DahlT. I. (2013). What’s in a face? Perhaps some elements of both eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 337–345. doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.803597.
51.
WatermanA. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678.
52.
WatsonD.ClarkA. L. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule—Expanded Form. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa.
53.
WatsonD.ClarkA. L.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
