Finding ways to foster intellectual humility (IH)—the willingness to own one’s limitations—is an important goal for facilitating effective learning. We report the results of a longitudinal, quasi-experimental study, conducted across six undergraduate, culturally diverse (58% racial/ethnic minority) introductory philosophy courses, that evaluates how social perceptions and cross-cultural reasoning change following a course on epistemology and social ethics. Critically, we manipulated whether each class received a standardized lesson in IH at the start of the course or not. Participants provided self-ratings of IH, gave round-robin judgments of their classmates, and completed a wise-reasoning writing exercise focusing on a cultural conflict at both the beginning and end of the summer course session. Results revealed no change in self-reported IH, but an increase in perceived peer IH and conscientiousness within classes where IH was taught. Moreover, an analysis of the participants’ writing suggested greater levels of compromise-seeking when dealing with a cultural conflict among the students taught about IH, relative to those in the control classes. This study provides initial insights regarding the relationship between IH and cultural humility, as well as the efficacy of facilitating the development of IH among undergraduate students.
BarakM.LevenbergA. (2016). A model of flexible thinking in contemporary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 74–85. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.003.
2.
BezrukovaK.SpellC. S.PerryJ. L.JehnK. A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142(11), 1227–1274. doi:10.1037/bul0000067.
3.
BrooksM. E.KristensenK.BenthemK. J.van, MagnussonA.BergC. W.NielsenA.et al. (2017). Modeling zero-inflated count data with glmmTMB. BioRxiv, 132753. doi:10.1101/132753.
4.
ChancellorJ.LyubomirskyS. (2013). Humble beginnings: Current trends, state perspectives, and hallmarks of humility. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(11), 819–833. doi:10.1111/spc3.12069.
5.
ChoiI.KooM.An ChoiJ. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 691–705. doi:10.1177/0146167206298568.
6.
DavisD. E.DeBlaereC.BrubakerK.OwenJ.JordanT. A.HookJ. N.TongerenD. R. V. (2016). Microaggressions and perceptions of cultural humility in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 94(4), 483–493. doi:10.1002/jcad.12107.
7.
DavisD. E.HookJ. N.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.Van TongerenD. R.GartnerA. L.JenningsD. J.EmmonsR. A. (2011). Relational humility: Conceptualizing and measuring humility as a personality judgment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(3), 225–234. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.558871.
8.
DavisD. E.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.HookJ. N. (2010). Humility: Review of measurement strategies and conceptualization as personality judgment. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 243–252. doi:10.1080/17439761003791672.
9.
DefflerS. A.LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (2016). Knowing what you know: Intellectual humility and judgments of recognition memory. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 255–259. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.016.
10.
DeWallC. N. (2017). Fostering intellectual humility in public discourse and university education. In WorthingtonE. L. J.DavisD. E.HookJ. N.WorthingtonE. L. J. (eds.), Handbook of humility: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 233–245). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
11.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1.
12.
GrossmannI. (2012). Wise reasoning: Technical manual. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo.
13.
GrossmannI. (2017). Wisdom in context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 233–257. doi:10.1177/1745691616672066.
14.
GrossmannI.GerlachT. M.DenissenJ. J. A. (2016). Wise reasoning in the face of everyday life challenges. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 611–622. doi:10.1177/1948550616652206.
15.
GrossmannI.KarasawaM.IzumiS.NaJ.VarnumM. E. W.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2012). Aging and wisdom: Culture matters. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1059–1066. doi:10.1177/0956797612446025.
16.
GrossmannI.NaJ.VarnumM. E. W.ParkD. C.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2010). Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(16), 7246–7250. doi:10.1073/pnas.1001715107.
17.
HaggardM.RowattW. C.LemanJ. C.MeagherB.MooreC.FergusT.et al. (2018). Finding middle ground between intellectual arrogance and intellectual servility: Development and assessment of the limitations-owning intellectual humility scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 184–193. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.014.
18.
HookJ. N.DavisD. E.OwenJ.WorthingtonE. LJr.UtseyS. O. (2013). Cultural humility: Measuring openness to culturally diverse clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 353–366. doi:10.1037/a0032595.
19.
HookJ. N.FarrellJ. E.DavisD. E.DeBlaereC.Van TongerenD. R.UtseyS. O. (2016). Cultural humility and racial microaggressions in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(3), 269–277. doi:10.1037/cou0000114.
20.
HookJ. N.WatkinsC. E.DavisD. E.OwenJ.van TongerenD. R.MarcianaJ. R. (2016). Cultural humility in psychotherapy supervision. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 70(2), 149–166. doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2016.70.2.149.
21.
HoyleR. H.DavissonE. K.DiebelsK. J.LearyM. R. (2016). Holding specific views with humility: Conceptualization and measurement of specific intellectual humility. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 165–172. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.043.
KennyD. A. (1988). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5(2), 247–261. doi:10.1177/026540758800500207.
24.
KennyD. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
KrossE.GrossmannI. (2012). Boosting wisdom: Distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 43–48. doi:10.1037/a0024158.
27.
Krumrei-MancusoE. J.RouseS. V. (2016). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Intellectual Humility Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1068174.
28.
LavelockC. R.EverettL.WorthingtonJ.DavisD. E.GriffinB. J.ReidC. A.HookJ. N.Van TongerenD. R. (2014). The quiet virtue speaks: An intervention to promote humility. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 42(1), 99–110. doi:10.1177/009164711404200111.
29.
LavelockC. R.WorthingtonE. L.GriffinB. J.GartheR. C.ElnassehA.DavisD. E.HookJ. N. (2017). Still waters run deep: Humility as a master virtue. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 45(4), 286–303. doi:10.1177/009164711704500404.
30.
LearyM. R.DiebelsK. J.DavissonE. K.Jongman-SerenoK. P.IsherwoodJ. C.RaimiK. T.et al. (2017). Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 793–813. doi:10.1177/0146167217697695.
31.
McElroyS. E.RiceK. G.DavisD. E.HookJ. N.HillP. C.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.Van TongerenD. R. (2014). Intellectual humility: Scale development and theoretical elaborations in the context of religious leadership. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 42(1), 19–30.
32.
MeagherB. R. (2016). Judgments of religiosity following minimal interaction. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 38(1), 1–21. doi:10.1163/15736121-12341318.
33.
MeagherB. R.KennyD. A. (2013). Judge, that ye shall be judged: Interpersonal judgments of religious characteristics within faith communities. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(2), 116–128. doi:10.1037/a0030438.
34.
MeagherB. R.LemanJ. C.BiasJ. P.LatendresseS. J.RowattW. C. (2015). Contrasting self-report and consensus ratings of intellectual humility and arrogance. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 35–45. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.07.002.
35.
PorterT.SchumannK. (2018). Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view. Self and Identity, 17(2), 139–162. doi:10.1080/15298868.2017.1361861.
36.
RahimM. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376. doi:10.2307/255985.
37.
RodriguezD.HookJ. N.FarrellJ. E.MosherD. K.ZhangH.TongerenD. R. V.et al. (2019). Religious intellectual humility, attitude change, and closeness following religious disagreement. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14, 133–140. doi:10.1080/17439760.2017.1388429.
38.
TwengeJ. M.FosterJ. D. (2010). Birth cohort increases in narcissistic personality traits among American college students, 1982–2009. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 99–106. doi:10.1177/1948550609355719.
39.
TwengeJ. M.KonrathS.FosterJ. D.CampbellW. K.BushmanB. J. (2008). Egos inflating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 875–902. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00507.x.
40.
VazireS. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281–300. doi:10.1037/a0017908.
41.
WeimerW. B. (1973). Psycholinguistics and Plato’s paradoxes of the Meno. American Psychologist, 28(1), 15–33. doi:10.1037/h0034089.
ZhouQ.ChanS. S.StewartS. M.LeungC. S.WanA.LamT. H. (2016). The effectiveness of positive psychology interventions in enhancing positive behaviors and family relationships in Hong Kong: A community-based participatory research project. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(1), 70–84. doi:10.1080/17439760.2015.1025421.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
