This qualitative phenomenological research study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 21 self-described practicing Evangelical Christian families who have both biological and adopted children. The participants in the study shared numerous common elements pertaining to their shared perspectives. Here, we present the results specifically related to the reported motivations of the parents for adopting children. Findings included theological motivations to adopt (i.e., perceived biblical mandate, perspective of ministry, concepts of spiritual adoption, views towards God's blessings) and a perspective that some romanticize the nature of adoption. We discuss various theological and spiritual implications of the findings in the context of biblical teachings to care for orphans and show love to underserved populations. The results also are related to research literature addressing the stress often reported by parents who adopt children.
BacchidduG. (2015). ‘Living at the margins of difference’: Transnational and transracial adoption and the re-formulation of the American family and of its members' assumptions. Social Anthropology / Anthropologie Sociale, 23, 510–514.
3.
BaileyS. J. (2015). Transnational adoption challenges: Through the eyes of Eastern European youth. Adoption Quarterly, 18, 85–107.
4.
BelangerK., CopelandS., & CheungM. (2008). The role of faith in adoption: Achieving positive adoption outcomes for African American children. Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice, and Program, 87, 99–123.
5.
BergB. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
ChenailR. J. (2012a). Conducting qualitative data analysis: Reading line-by-line, but analyzing by meaningful qualitative units. The Qualitative Report, 17, 266–269.
7.
ChenailR. J. (2012b). Conducting qualitative data analysis: Managing dynamic tensions within. The Qualitative Report, 17, 1–6.
8.
CreswellJ. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
9.
FirminM., & FulmerC. (2007). Perspective on adoptive children experiencing more conflicts. Marriage & Family: A Christian Journal, 7, 269–278.
10.
FlickV. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
FuschP., & NessL. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1408–1416.
12.
GayL. R., MillsG. E., & AirasianP. (2009). Educational research (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
GuestG., BunceA., & JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82.
15.
Howell-MoroneyM. (2013). Faith-based partnerships and foster parent satisfaction. Journal of Health & Human Services Administration, 36, 228–251.
16.
Howell-MoroneyM. (2014). The empirical ties between religious motivation and altruism in foster parents: Implications for faith-based initiatives in foster care and adoption. Religions, 5, 720–737.
17.
HugoV. (1987). Les Miserables.New York, NY: Random House. (Original work published 1862)
18.
JenningsS., MellishL., TaskerF., LambM., & GolombokS. (2014). Why adoption? Gay, lesbian, and heterosexual adoptive parents' reproductive experiences and reasons for adoption. Adoption Quarterly, 17, 205–226.
19.
LionettiF., PastoreM., & BaroneL. (2015). Parenting stress: The roles of attachment states of mind and parenting alliance in the context of adoption. Parenting: Science and Practice, 15, 75–91.
20.
MaxwellJ. A. (2012). Qualitative research design (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Mero-JaffeI. (2011). ‘Is that what I said?’ Interview transcript approval by participants: An aspect of ethics in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10, 231–247.
22.
MillerP. (2008). Validity. In GivenL. (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2; pp. 909–910). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
MontgomeryL. M. (1935). Anne of Green Gables.New York, NY: Grosset & Dunlap.
24.
NeumanW. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
NewmanI., RidenourC. S., NewmanC., SmithS., & BrownR. C. (2013). Detecting low incidents effects: The value of mixed methods. Midwestern Educational Researcher, 25, 31–46.
26.
OppongS. H., (2013). The problem of sampling in qualitative research. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 2, 202–210.
27.
PerryS. L. (2013). Conservative Christians and support for transracial adoption as an alternative to abortion. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 380–392.
28.
PinderhughesE., MatthewsJ., & ZhangX. (2015). Research on adoptive families and their 21st century challenges. In BrowningS., & PasleyK. (Eds.), Contemporary families (pp. 14–34). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
PriceJ. H., & MurnanJ. (2004). Research limitations and the necessity of reporting them. American Journal of Health Education, 35, 66–67.
30.
RapportF., StoreyM., PorterA., SnooksH., JonesK., PeconiJ., …, & RussellI. (2013). Qualitative research within trials: Developing a standard operating procedure for a clinical trials unit. Trials, 14, 1–8.
31.
RodgersB. (2008). Audit trail. In GivenL. (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol 1; pp. 43–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
ReillyT., & PlatzL. (2003). Characteristics and challenges of families who adopt children with special needs: An empirical study. Children and Youth Services Review, 25, 781–803.
33.
SegalN. L. (2012). Born together—reared apart: The landmark Minnesota twin study.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
34.
SelmanP. (2009). The movement of children for international adoption: Developments and trends in receiving states and states of origin, 1998-2004. In MarreD., & BriggsL. (Eds.), International adoption: Global inequalities and the circulation of children (pp. 32–51). New York: New York University Press.
SinS. (2010). Considerations of quality in phenomenographic research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9, 305–319.
37.
SmolinD. M. (2012). Of orphans and adoption, parents and the poor, exploitation and rescue: A scriptural and theological critique of the Evangelical Christian adoption and orphan care movement. Journal of Christian Legal Thought, 2, 6–8.
38.
StillmanS. A. (2015). Parental practices of discipline with re-adopted children: A mixed methods study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, KY.
39.
SoulenKendall (2004). God's first love. Christian Century, 121(15), 22.
40.
WatersB. (2012). Christian adoption?Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 51, 305–312.
41.
WillisJ. W. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
WrobelG. M. (2012). Understanding the adoptive family within the context of Christian hospitality. Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 51, 313–322.
