In this article, we review the current status of theory and research on teaching Christian integration in psychology and counseling. Changes in student characteristics, emerging technologies, and paradigm shifts in the disciplines themselves predict unique opportunities and challenges for the future. We reflect upon directions integration learning theory and pedagogy should take in light of these considerations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnaG. (2005). Revolution.Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.
2.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A secure base.New York: Basic Books.
3.
BurtonL. D., & NwosuC. C. (2003). Student perceptions of the integration of faith, learning and practice in an educational methods course. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 12(2), 101–135.
4.
CoeJ., & HallT. (2010). Psychology in the Spirit: Contours of a transformational psychology.Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.
5.
EntwistleD.N. (2010). Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity: An introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations, and models of integration (2nd edition). Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
6.
HallM. E. L. (2004). God as cause or error?: Academic psychology as Christian vocation. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 32, 200–209.
7.
HallE.L., RipleyJ.S., GarzonF.L., & MangisM.W. (2009). The other side of the podium: Student perspectives on learning integration. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37, 15–27.
8.
KochC., & DoughtyT. (1998). Integrating across the psychology curriculum: A follow-up evaluation plan. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 26(2), 204–208.
9.
LawrenceT. A., BurtonL. D., & NwosuC. C. (2005). Refocusing on the learning in “integration of faith and learning.”Journal of Research on Christian Education, 14(1), 17–50.
10.
MatthiasL. R. (2008). Professors who walk humbly with their God: Exemplars in the integration of faith and learning at Wheaton College. Journal of Education and Christian Belief12(2), 145–157.
11.
MurphyN. C. (2006). Bodies and souls, or spirited bodies?New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
RipleyJ. S., GarzonF. L., HallM. E. L., MangisM. W., MurphyC. J. (2009). Pilgrims’ progress: Faculty and university factors in graduate student integration of faith and profession. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37(1), 5–14.
13.
SitesE. C., GarzonF. L., MilacciF. A., BootheB. (2009). A phenomenology of the integration of faith and learning. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37(1), 28–38.
14.
SorensonR. (1994). Therapists’ (and their therapists’) God representations in clinical practice. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 22, 325–344.
15.
SorensonR. (1997). Doctoral student's integration of psychology and Christianity: Perspectives via attachment theory and multidimensional scaling. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 530–548.
16.
SorensonR., DerflingerK., BuffordR., & McMinnM. (2004). National collaborative research on how students learn integration: Final report. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 23, 355–365.
17.
StatonR., SorensonR., & Vande KempH. (1998). How students learn integration: Replication of the Sorenson (1997a) model. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 26, 340–350.
18.
StevensonD. H., & YoungP. D. (1995). The heart of the curriculum?: A status report on explicit integration courses in Christian colleges and universities. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 23(4), 248–260.
