BekerJ.C. (1992, May). Integration and integrity in New Testament studies. The Christian Century, (109), 515–17.
2.
BrownJ.K., DahlC.M., & Corbin ReuschlingW. (2011). Becoming whole and holy: An integrative conversation about Christian Formation.Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos.
3.
DueckA., & ReimerK. (2009). A peaceable psychology: Christian therapy in a world of many cultures.Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.
4.
EllensJ.H., & RollinsW.G. (Eds.). (2004). Psychology and the Bible: A new way to read the scriptures.4 Vols. Westport, Conn: Praeger.
5.
GreenJ.B. (2007). 1 Peter: Two Horizons Commentary on the New Testament.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
6.
HeardW.J.Jr. (1993). Eschatologically oriented psychology: A new paradigm for the integration of psychology and Christianity. In CarsonD.A., & WoodbridgeJ.D. (Eds.), God and culture: Essays in honor of Carl F. H. Henry (pp. 106–133). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
7.
JankowskiP.J., & SandageS.J. (2011). Spiritual dwelling and well-being: The mediating role of differentiation of self in a sample of distressed adults. Mental Health, Religion, & Culture. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/13674676.2011.579592
8.
JohnsonE.L. (2011). Psychology & Christianity: Five views (2nd ed). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
9.
KillenP. O., & De BeerJ., (2002). The Art of Theological Reflection.New York: Crossroad Publishing.
10.
KingM.L.Jr. (1986). A testament of hope: The essential writings and speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr. (WashingtonJ.M., Ed.). New York: HarperOne. (Original work published 1968).
11.
LindbeckG. (1997). The story-shaped church: Critical exegesis and theological interpretation. In FowlS.E. (Ed.), The theological interpretation of scripture: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. 39–52). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
12.
MajerusB., & SandageS.J. (2010). Differentiation of self and Christian spiritual maturity: Social science and theological integration. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 38, 41–51.
13.
McNeilJ.D. (2005). Unequally yoked? The role of culture in the relationship between theology and psychology. In DueckA., & LeeC. (Eds.), Why psychology needs theology: A radical-reformation perspective (pp. 140–160). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
14.
PorterS.L. (2010). Theology as queen and psychology as handmaid: The authority of theology in integrative endeavors. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 29, 3–14.
15.
ReynhoutK. A. (2007). The Hermeneutics of transdisciplinarity: A Gadamerian model of transversing reasoning. Transdisciplinarity in Science and Religion, 2, 77–101.
16.
SandageS.J., & BrownJ.K. (2010). Monarchy or democracy in relational integration? A reply to Porter. Journal of Psychology & Christianity, 29, 20–26.
17.
SandageS.J., & HardenM.G. (2011). Relational spirituality, differentiation of self, and virtue as predictors of intercultural development. Mental Health, Religion, & Culture. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/13674676.2010.527932
18.
ShultsF.L., & SandageS.J. (2003). Faces of forgiveness: Searching for wholeness and salvation.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.