The study of religious motivation has been an important area of research in the psychology of religion since Allport and Ross (1967) developed their measure of intrinsic/extrinsic religion. Batson (1976) expanded the model of religious motivation by proposing the quest construct and its measurement with the Interactional Scale. Two additional measures of quest were developed by Altemeyer and Hunsberger (1992) and Dudley and Cruise (1990). Questions have been raised about the reliability and validity of the quest construct and its measures. The present study investigates the dimensionality and convergence of three measures of quest using a sample of 1200 undergraduates from nine Christian liberal arts colleges. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified five quest dimensions. The correlations of the five quest dimensions with several measures of religious functioning and religious fundamentalism were examined. Differences across four college classes on the quest dimensions were also tested. The three quest measures converged on two dimensions labeled Belief Change Expected and Doubts Value. These dimensions were uncorrelated with measures of God awareness and religious well-being and negatively correlated with religious fundamentalism. The three other dimensions identified were unique to one of the measures. The dimension regarding existential questions was not well sampled by our pool of items. The dimensions Reason versus Faith and Religion as Quest were correlated negatively with God awareness and religious well-being as well as religious fundamentalism. The quest dimensions of change and doubt are core facets of Batson's original formulation and our results validate these two dimensions of his model. Measurement of the questions dimension requires further development. The validity and utility of the other two dimensions as aspects of quest will require further investigation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W., & RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.
2.
AltemeyerB., & HunsbergerB. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.
BeckR., BakerL., RobbinsM, & DowS. (2001). A second look at quest motivation: Is Quest unidimensional or multidimensional?Journal of Psychology and Theology, 29, 148–157.
5.
BeckR., & JessupR. K. (2004). The Multidimensional Nature of Quest Motivation. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 32, 283–294.
6.
BassettR. L., CamplinW., HumphreyD., DorrD., BiggsS., DistaffenR., DoxatorI., FlahertyM., HunsbergerP. J., PoageR., & ThompsonH. (1991). Measuring Christian maturity: A comparison of several scales. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 84–93.
7.
BatsonC. D. (1976). Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent?Journal for the scientific study of religion, 15, 29–45.
8.
BatsonC. D., & SchoenradeP. A. (1991a). Measuring religion as quest: Validity concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 416–429.
9.
BatsonC. D., & SchoenradeP. A. (1991b). Measuring religion as quest: Reliability concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 430–447.
10.
BatsonC. D., SchoenradeP. A., & VentisW. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective.New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
BatsonC. D., & VentisW. L. (1982). The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective.New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
BennerD. G. (1988). Psychotherapy and the spiritual quest.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
13.
BensonP. L., DonahueM. J., & EricksonJ. A. (1993). The Faith Maturity Scale: Conceptualization, measurement, and empirical validation. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 1–26.
14.
BuhrowW., CalkinsP., HawsJ., & RostK. (1986). The Spiritual Maturity Index: A study of reliability and validity. Unpublished manuscript, Alliance Theological Seminary.
15.
BuffordR. K., PaloutzianR. F., & EllisonC. W. (1991). Norms for the spiritual well-being scale. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 56–70.
16.
BuffordR. K. (1984, April). Empirical correlates of Spiritual Well-Being and Spiritual Maturity scales. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Christian Association for Psychological Studies, Dallas TX.
17.
Campbell-SillsL., & BrownT. A. (2005). Latent variable approaches to studying the psychopathology and classification of emotional disorders. In AndrasikF. (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology (Vol.II: adult psychopathology, pp. 21–35). New York: John Wiley & and Sons.
18.
CannonM. M. (1994). The psychological development of and spiritual development of women: An empirical study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Loyola College, Maryland.
19.
CooperR. L. (1987). An empirical examination of the construct validity of the Spiritual Maturity Index. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 4645B. (University Microfilms International, 87-04712)
20.
CrowneD. P., & MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
21.
DavisW. W., LongfellowD. R., MoodyA. V., & MoynihanW. S. (1987). Spiritual Maturity Index: Construct validation. Unpublished manuscript, presented at Western Conservative Baptist Seminary, Portland, OR.
22.
DudleyR. L., & CruiseR. J. (1990). Measuring religious maturity: A proposed scale. Review of Religious Research, 32, 97–109.
23.
EdwardsK. J., SlaterW., HallT. W., OdaA., & EckB. (August, 2001). Spiritual change among college students: A National Study. Paper presented at the 109th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
24.
EllisonC. W. (1983). Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 330–340.
25.
EllisonC. W. & SmithJ. (1991). Toward an integrative measure of health and well-being. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 35–48.
26.
GeniaV. (1991). The spiritual experience index: A measure of spiritual maturity. Journal of Religion and Health, 30, 337–347.
27.
GorsuchR. L. (1984). Measurement: The boon and bane of investigating religion. American Psychologist, 39, 228–236.
28.
GorsuchR. L. (1988). Psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 201–221.
29.
GorsuchR. L., & McPhersonS. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348–354.
30.
HallT. W., & EdwardsK. J. (1996). The initial development and factor analysis of the Spiritual Assessment Inventory. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 24, 233–246.
31.
HoodR. W.Jr., & MorrisT. J. (1985). Conceptualization of Quest: A critical rejoinder Batson. Review of Religious Research, 26, 391–397.
32.
KauffmanJ. H. (1979). “Social correlates of spiritual maturity among North American Mennonites.” In MobergDavid O. (Ed.). Spiritual well-being: Sociological perspectives.Washington, DC: University Press of America, Pp. 237–254.
33.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1988). A psychometric analysis of the Allport-Ross and Feagin measures of intrinsic-extrinsic religious orientation. In MobergD. O., & LynnM. L. (Eds.), Research in the social scientific study of religion (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
34.
KirkpatrickL. A., & HoodR. W. (1990). Intrinsic-extrinsic religious orientation: The boon or bane of contemporary psychology of religion?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 442–462.
35.
MethuenL. K., & MethuenB. O. (2004). Mplus users guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Methuen & Methuen.
36.
McFarlandS. G. (1989). Religious orientations and the targets of discrimination. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 324–336.
37.
MobergD. O. (1971). Spiritual well-being: Background issues.Washington, DC: White House Conference on Aging.
38.
MobergD. O. (1984). Subjective measures of spiritual well-being. Review of Religious Research, 25, 351–364.
39.
PaloutzianR. F. (1996). Invitation to the psychology of religion (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
40.
PaloutzianR. F., & EllisonC. W.Loneliness, spiritual well-being and quality of life. In PeplauL. A., and PerlmanD. (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy.New York: Wiley Interscience, 1982.
41.
PargamentK. I. (1999). The psychology of religion and spirituality? Yes and no. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, 3–16.
42.
PargamentK. I. (1992). Of means and ends: Religion and the search for significance. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 201–229.
43.
RummelR. L. (1970). Applied factor analysis.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
44.
SlaterW. E. (1999, August). Defining and measuring spiritual health: An investigation of the psychometric properties of measures of spiritual well-being and spiritual maturity. Paper presented at 107th Annual Convention of American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
45.
SlaterW. E. (1998, March). Measures of spiritual maturity: An investigation of their psychometric properties. Paper presented at the Coalition for Christian Colleges and Universities National Assessment Conference, Cleveland, TN.
46.
SteigerJ. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.
47.
StrahanR., & GerbasiK. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.
48.
VentisW. L. (1995). The relationship between religion and mental health. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 33–48.
49.
WatsonP. J., MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1989). Interactional factor correlations with Means and End religiousness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 337–347.
50.
YeattsJ. R., & AsherW. (1982). Factor analysis of religious variables: Some methodological considerations. Review of Religious Research.24, 49–54.
