There has been a history of suspicion and distrust between organized psychology and religion for more than a century. The nexus of this strained relationship is played out in the context of accreditation, in which doctoral programs in Christian institutions have faced challenges in obtaining accreditation. Some of these challenges have related to freedom of religion, academic freedom, non-discrimination policies, and diversity training. Footnote 4 in the APA Accreditation Guidelines and Principles is designed to address these challenges, yet there is ongoing discussion about the implementation and use of this footnote. The relationship between the accrediting body and Christian programs has developed from deep suspicion to a working, but cautious relationship; yet, the future of this relationship remains uncertain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (1995). Guidelines and principles for accreditation of programs in professional psychology.Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AtenJ., & LeachM. (2009). (Eds.). Spirituality and the therapeutic process: A comprehensive resource from intake through termination.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
3.
BerginA. E., & JensenJ. (1990). Religiosity of psychotherapists: A national survey. Psychotherapy, 27, 3–7.
BrawerP. A., HandalP. J., FabricatoreA. N., RobertsR., & Wajda-JohnstonV. A. (2002). Training and education in religion/spirituality within APA-accredited clinical psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 203–206.
6.
CrandallC. S., & EshlemanA. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414–446.
7.
EllisA. (1980). The case against religion: A psychotherapist's view and the case against religiosity.New Jersey: American Atheist Press.
8.
GartnerJ. D. (1985). Religious prejudice in psychology: Theories of its cause and cure. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 4, 16–23.
9.
GartnerJ. D. (1986). Antireligious prejudice in admissions to doctoral programs in clinical psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 473–475.
10.
HogeD. R. (1996). Religion in America: The demographics of belief and affiliation. In ShafranskeE. P. (Ed.) Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (pp. 21–41). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.
HorneyK. (1945). Our inner conflicts: A constructive theory of neurosis.New York: W. W. Norton.
12.
HuntD., & McMahonT. A. (1985). The seduction of Christianity: Spiritual discernment in the last days. Eugene, OR: Harvest House.
13.
HuntD., & McMahonT. A. (1988). America: The sorcerer's new apprentice.Eugene, OR: Harvest House.
14.
KlaymanJ., & HaJ. (1987). Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228.
15.
LaHayeT. (1980). The battle for the mind.Old Tappen: NJ: Fleming H. Revell.
16.
JohnsonW. B., CampbellC. D., & DykstraM. L. (1997). Professional training in religious institutions: Articulating models and outcomes. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25, 260–271.
17.
JohnsonW. B., & McMinnM. R. (2003). Thirty years of integrative doctoral training: Historic developments, assessment of outcomes, and recommendations for the future. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31, 83–96.
18.
JohnsonW. B., RidleyC. R., & NielsenS. L. (2000). Religiously sensitive rational emotive behavior therapy: Elegant solutions and ethical risks. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 14–20.
19.
JonesS. L. (1994). A constructive relationship for religion with the science and profession of psychology: Perhaps the boldest model yet. American Psychologist, 49, 184–199.
20.
KilpatrickW. K. (1983). Psychological seduction: The failure of modern psychology.New York: Thomas Nelson.
21.
MaloneyH. N. (1995). Psychology and the cross. The early history of Fuller Seminary's School of Psychology.Pasadena, CA: Fuller Seminary Press.
22.
McMinnM. R., JohnsonW. B., & HaskellJ. S. (2004). Publication frequency among faculty in explicitly Christian doctoral programs. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 23, 298–304.
23.
MeekK. R., & McMinnM. R. (1999). The effectiveness of religious and nonreligious graduate training programs in preparing psychologists to deal with experiences of sexual attraction: Survey findings and implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 423–427.
24.
PettigrewT. F., & TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
25.
PikeP. L., McMinnM. R., & CampbellC. D. (1997). Market and mission. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25, 278–283.
26.
ReddingR. E. (2001). Sociopolitical diversity in psychology. American Psychologist, 56, 205–215.
27.
ShafranskeE. P. (1996). Religious beliefs, affiliations, and practices of clinical psychologists. In ShafranskeE. P. (Ed.) Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (pp. 149–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
