The authors first attempt to conceptualize theistic psychotherapy by discussing the relationship between theism and naturalism. Many psychologists have assumed that naturalism and theism can be combined in various ways, so the authors review the more prominent of these combinations at the outset. They argue not only that these mixtures are “weak” (i.e., they restrain God in some way) but also that they ultimately assume naturalism is incompatible in many ways with theism. The authors compare “weak” theism with a “strong” theism that does not restrain God or rely on naturalistic assumptions. This comparison is elaborated by distinguishing a published example of strongly theistic psychotherapy from three common types of weakly theistic psychotherapy, with corresponding examples from the theistic literature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartzJ. D. (2009). Theistic existential psychotherapy. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1, 69–80.
2.
BrownW., MurphyN., & MalonyH. (1998). Whatever happened to the soul? Scientific and theological portraits of human nature.Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
3.
CollinsG. R. (1977). The rebuilding of psychology: An integration of psychology and Christianity.Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House.
4.
D'SouzaD. (2007). What's so great about Christianity.Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House.
5.
Griffin (2000). Religion and scientific naturalism: Overcoming the conflicts.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
6.
GuntonC. (1993). The one, the three, and the many: God, creation, and the culture of modernity.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
7.
HabermasJ. (2008). Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essays.Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
8.
HallM. E. L. (2004). God as cause or error? Academic psychology as Christian vocation. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 32, 200–209.
9.
HardmanR. K., BerrettM. E., & RichardsP. S. (2004). A theistic inpatient treatment approach for eating disorder patients: A case report. In RichardsP. S., & BerginA. E. (Eds.), Casebook for a spiritual strategy in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 55–73). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
HunterC. G. (2007). Science's blind spot: The unseen religion of scientific naturalism.Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.
11.
JankowskiP. J. (2003). Integrating postmodern therapies and spirituality: A solution to the contemporary crisis of the self. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 22, 241–249.
12.
JonesS. L. (2006). Integration: Defending it, describing it, doing it. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 252–259.
13.
KrejciM. J. (2004). Forgiveness in marital therapy. In RichardsP. S., & BerginA. E. (Eds.), Casebook for a spiritual strategy in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 87–102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
LeaheyT. H. (1991). A history of modern psychology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
LovingerR. J. (1996). Considering the religious dimension in assessment and treatment. In ShafranskeE. P. (Ed.), Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (pp. 327–364). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
MillerW. R., & DelaneyH. D. (Eds.). (2005). Judeo-Christian perspectives on psychology.Washington, DC: APA Books.
17.
NelsonJ. M. (2006). Missed opportunities in dialogue between psychology and religion. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 205–216.
18.
NelsonJ. M. (2009). Psychology, religion, and spirituality.New York: Springer.
19.
OlthuisJ. H. (2006). With-ing: A psychotherapy of love. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 66–77.
20.
PhilipchalkR. P. (1987). Psychology and Christianity: An introduction to controversial issues.Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
21.
PlantingaA. (2001). Methodological naturalism? In PennockR. T. (Ed.), Intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological, and scientific perspectives (pp. 339–362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
PorporaD. V. (2006). Methodological atheism, methodological agnosticism and religious experience. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36, 57–75.
23.
ReberJ. S. (2006). Secular psychology: What's the problem?Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 193–204.
24.
RichardsP. S., & BerginA. E. (Eds.). (2004). Casebook for a spiritual strategy in counseling and psychotherapy.Washington, DC: APA Books.
25.
RichardsP. S., & BerginA. E. (2005). A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: APA Books.
26.
RichardsonF. C., FowersB. J., & GuignonC. B. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
RussellC. A. (2002). The conflict of science and religion. In FerngrenG. B. (Ed.), Science and religion: A historical introduction (pp. 3–12). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
RychlakJ. F. (1981). Introduction to personality and psychotherapy: A theory-construction approach (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
29.
SlifeB. D. (2004). Theoretical challenges to therapy practice and research: The constraint of naturalism. In LambertM. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change.New York: Wiley.
30.
SlifeB. D., & EllertsonC. F. (2004). Dogma and dialogue: The interface of Christianity and psychology. Contemporary Psychology, 49, 677–679.
31.
SlifeB. D., & MellingB. S. (2006). Psychological method and the activity of God: Clarifications and distinctions. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 280–285.
32.
SlifeB. D., MitchellL. J., & WhooleryM. (2004). A theistic approach to therapeutic community: Non-naturalism and the All-dredge Academy. In RichardsP. S., & BerginA. E. (Eds.), Casebook for a spiritual strategy in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 35–54). Washington, DC: APA Books.
33.
SlifeB. D., & NelsonJ. M. (2006). Implications for the psychology of religion. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 289–291.
34.
SlifeB. D., & ReberJ. S. (2009). Is there a pervasive implicit bias against theism in psychology?Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 29, 63–79.
35.
SlifeB. D., & RichardsS. P. (2001). How separable are spirituality and theology in psychotherapy?Counseling and Values, 45, 190–206.
36.
SlifeB. D., & WhooleryM. (2006). Are psychology's main theories and methods biased against its main consumers?Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 217–231.
37.
SlifeB. D., WilliamsR. N., & BarlowS. H. (Eds.) (2001). Critical issues in psychotherapy: Translating new ideas into practice.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
SmithH. (2001). Why religion matters: The fate of the human spirit in an age of disbelief.New York: Harper Collins.
39.
SperryL., & ShafranskeE. P. (Eds.) (2005). Spiritually oriented psychotherapy.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
TaylorC. (2007). A secular age.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
41.
VanderStoepS. W. (2003). Science and the soul: Christian faith and psychological research.Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
42.
WacomeD. H. (2003). Evolutionary psychology. In VanderStoepS. W. (Ed.), Science and the soul: Christian faith and psychological research (pp. 183–208). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
