Should alleviating suffering always be the primary goal in treatment? This paper proposes that suffering can best be understood in the context of the flourishing life, from the intersecting vantage points of positive psychology, philosophy of theology. We further argue that in this context, we can articulate a role for suffering. Suffering can be understood as a marker of disordered living, a means of cultivating characteristics that are essential to the flourishing life, or an opportunity for worldview orientation. In sum, the role of suffering is not to endure it for its own sake, but for the sake of cultivating the flourishing life. Finally, we will consider some implications of this conceptualization for the practice of therapy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aquinas. (2008). The Summa Theological of St. Thomas Aquinas, ST II.ii (2nd and rev. ed., 1920). Available online: http://www.newadvent.org/summa/
JosephS., & LinleyP. A. (2005). Positive adjustment to threatening events: An organismic valuing theory of growth through adversity. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 262–280.
LewisC. S. (1952). Mere Christianity.New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
14.
LinleyP. A., & JosephS. (2004). Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(1), 11–21.
15.
MattisonW. C.III (2008). Introducing moral theology: True happiness and the virtues.Grand Rapids: Brazos Press.
16.
McMinnM. R. (2004). Why sin matters: The surprising relationship between our sin and God's grace.Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.
17.
NashR. H. (1988). Faith and reason: Searching for a rational faith.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
18.
NussbaumM. (1988). Non-Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach. In FrenchP. A., UehlingT. E.Jr., & WettsteinH. K. (Eds.), Ethical theory: Character and virtue (pp. 32–53). Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol XIII. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
19.
PakalukM. (2005). Aristotle's Nicomachean ethics: An introduction. Cambridge introductions to key philosophical texts.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
ParkN., PetersonC., & SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603–619.
21.
ParkN., PetersonC., & SeligmanM. E. P. (2006). Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(3), 118–129.
22.
PetersonC. (2006). A primer in positive psychology.New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
PetersonC., & SeligmanM. E. P. (2003). Character strengths before and after September 11. Psychological Science, 14, 381–384.
24.
PetersonC., & SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification.New York: Oxford University Press.
