Psychoanalysis,Attachment,and Spirituality Part I: The Emergence of Two Relational Traditions

Abstract

Two broad relational traditions emerged in post-Freudian psychoanalysis: a broad group of relational theories, represented by Fairbairn's (1952) object relations theory, that remained within the field of psychoanalysis, and John Bowlby's attachment theory, that split off from psychoanalysis. Both of these traditions emerged simultaneously, predominantly in the 1940s, and developed in parallel in virtual isolation from each other. In this article, the first of a two-part series in this special issue, I outline the emergence of these two traditions, how each has been applied to the psychology of religion and spirituality, and their implications for “minding” our clients' spirituality (Sorenson, 2004). In the second article of the two-part series, I discuss the common relational metapsychology underlying these converging traditions–-a theory of implicit relational meaning–-and its implications for “minding” the spiritual stories by which our clients live.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bartholomew

(1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147–178.

Bauman

P.J.

(1995). Correlations among marital intimacy, object relations, mental representations of God and spiritual well-being (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1995), Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 11B.

Beck

, & McDonald

(2004). Attachment to God: The Attachment to God Inventory, tests of working model correspondence, and an exploration of faith group differences. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 32, 92–103.

Bell

(1991). An introduction to the Bell Object Relations Reality Testing Inventory. (Available from Morris D. Bell, PhD, Psychology Service, 116B, VA Medical Center, West Haven, CT 06516).

Benner

(1983). The incarnation as a metaphor for psychotherapy. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 287–294.

Birky

I. T.

, & Ball

(1988). Parental trait influence on God as an object representation. Journal of Psychology, 122, 133–137.

Bowlby

(1944). Forty-four juvenile thieves: Their characters and home life. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 25, 1–57.

Bowlby

(1951). Maternal care and mental health. World Health Organization, Monograph Series, No. 2.

Bowlby

(1965). Child care and the growth of love. London: Penguin Books, 1953; new and enlarged edition, 1965.

10.

Bowlby

(1973). Attachment and loss, Volume II: Separation. New York: Basic Books.

11.

Bowlby

(1982). Attachment and loss, Volume I: Attachment. New York: Basic Books, Second Edition.

12.

Bowlby

(1980). Attachment and loss, Volume III: Loss. New York: Basic Books.

13.

Brokaw

B.F.

, Edwards

K.J.

(1994). The relationship of God image to level of object relations development. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 22, 352–371.

14.

Bucci

(1997). Psychoanalysis and cognitive science: A multiple code theory. New York: Guilford Press.

15.

Byrd

K. R.

, & Boe

(2001). The correspondence between attachment dimensions and prayer in college students. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11(1), 9–24.

16.

Earnest

J. R.

(1982). Personal religious orientation and God-concepts as a function of remembered family authoritarianism (Doctoral dissertation, Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(5B), 1658.

17.

Fairbairn

W. R. D.

(1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London: Tavistock Publications.

18.

Fonagy

(2001). Attachment and Psychoanalysis. New York: Other Press.

19.

Goldberg

, Muir

, & Kerr

(Eds.). (2000). Attachment theory: Social, developmental and clinical perspectives (pp 19–45). New York: The Analytic Press.

20.

Goleman

(2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. New York: Bantam Books.

21.

Granqvist

(1998). Religiousness and perceived childhood attachment: On the question of compensation or correspondence. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(2), 350–367.

22.

Granqvist

(2002). Attachment and religiosity in adolescence: Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluations. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 260–270.

23.

Granqvist

, & Hagekull

(1999). Religiousness and perceived childhood attachment: Profiling socialized correspondence and emotional compensation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(2), 254–273.

24.

Green

J. D.

, & Campbell

W. K.

(2000). Attachment and exploration in adults: Chronic and context accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 452–461.

25.

Greenberg

J. R.

, & Mitchell

S. A.

(1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

26.

Hall

T. W.

(2004). Christian spirituality and mental health: A relational spirituality framework for empirical research. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 23(1), 66–81.

27.

Hall

T. W.

, Brokaw

B. F.

, Edwards

K. J.

, & Pike

P. L.

(1998). An empirical exploration of psychoanalysis and religion: Spiritual maturity and object relations development. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(2), 303–313.

28.

Hall

T. W.

, & Edwards

K. J.

(2002). The Spiritual Assessment Inventory: A theistic model and measure for assessing spiritual development. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(2), 341–357.

29.

Hall

T.W.

, Halcrow

, Hill

P.C.

, & Delaney

(August, 2005). Internal Working Model Correspondence in Implicit Spiritual Experiences. Paper presented at the 113th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

30.

Holmes

(1993). John Bowlby and Attachment Theory. New York: Brunner-Routledge.

31.

Jones

J. W.

(1991). Contemporary psychoanalysis and religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.

32.

Kirkpatrick

L.A.

(1997). A longitudinal study of changes in religious belief and behavior as a function of individual differences in adult attachment style. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36(2), 207–217.

33.

Kirkpatrick

L.A.

(1998). God as a substitute attachment figure: A longitudinal study of adult attachment style and religious change in college students. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol 24(9), 961–973.

34.

Kirkpatrick

(2004). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. New York: Guilford Press.

35.

Kirkpatrick

L.A.

, & Shaver

P.R.

(1990). Attachment theory and religion: Childhood attachments, religious beliefs, and conversion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(3), 315–334.

36.

McDargh

(1983). Psychoanalytic object relations theory and the study of religion. New York: University Press of America.

37.

McDargh

(1986). God, mother and me: An object relational perspective on religious material. Pastoral Psychology, 34, 251–263.

38.

Mikulincer

, & Nachshon

(1991). Attachment styles and patterns of self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 321–332.

39.

Mikulincer

, & Orbach

(1995). Attachment styles and repressive defensiveness: The accessibility and architecture of affective memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 917–925.

40.

Mitchell

S.A.

(1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

41.

Mitchell

S.A.

(2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

42.

Noffke

(2006). Redefining correspondent and compensatory relationships with God: A synthesis of object relations and attachment literatures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University, La Mirada, CA.

43.

Rizzuto

A. M.

(1979). The birth of the living God. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

44.

Rowatt

W.C.

, & Kirkpatrick

L.A.

(2002). Two dimensions of attachment to God and their relation to affect, religiosity, and personality constructs. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(4), 637–651.

45.

Shaver

P. R.

, & Mikulincer

(2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment & Human Development, 4(2), 133–161.

46.

Siegel

D.J.

(1999). The developing mind. New York: Guilford Press.

47.

Sorenson

(2004). Minding spirituality. New York: The Analytic Press.

48.

Spear

(1994, August). Conscious and pre-conscious God representations: An object relations perspective. Paper presented at the 1994 Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.

49.

Stern

D.N.

, Sander

L.W.

, Nahum

J.P.

, Harrison

A.M.

, LyonsRuth

, Morgan

A.C.

, Bruschweiler-Stern

, & Tronick

E.Z.

(1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The ‘something more’ than interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 903–921.

50.

Tisdale

T. C.

, Key

T. L.

, Edwards

K. J.

, Brokaw

B. F.

, Kemperman

S. R.

, Cloud

, Townsend

, Okamoto

(1997). Impact of treatment on God image and personal adjustment, and correlations of God image to personal adjustment and object relations development. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25, 227–239.

51.

Wootton

R. J.

(1991). God-representation and its relation to object relations and defensive functioning (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 5600B.