DueckA., & ReimerK. (2001). Psychotherapy and religious discourse: Thick and/or thin. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
2.
FaulconerJ. (2005). Knowledge of the other. European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counseling, and Health, 7(1-2), 49–63.
3.
GadamerH. G. (1975). Truth and method. (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.) (Rev. ed.). New York: Continuum. (Original work published 1960)
4.
GriffinD. R. (2000). Religion and scientific naturalism: Overcoming the conflicts.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
5.
IqbalM. (2002). Islam and science.Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
6.
LameterC. (2006). Divine action in the framework of scientific thinking: From quantum theory to divine actionNewark, CA: Christianity in the 21st Century.
7.
MarionJ. (2000). The saturated phenomenon. In Janicaud, Dominique, Jean-François Courtine, Jean-Louis Chrétien, Michel Henry, Jean-Luc Marion, and Paul Ricoeur, Phenomenology and the “Theological Turn.” Translated by Bernard G. Prusak and Jeffrey L. Klosky. New York: Fordham University Press.
8.
SaundersN. (2002). Divine action and modern science.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9.
SlifeB.D., & EllertsonC.F. (2004). Dogma and dialogue: The interface of Christianity and psychology. Contemporary Psychology, 49(6), [pp?}
10.
VanderStoepS. W. (2003). Science and the soul: Christian faith and psychological research.New York: University Press of America.
11.
WacomeD. H. (2003). Evolutionary psychology. In VanderStoepS.W. (Ed.), Science and the Soul: Christian faith and psychological research. (pp. 183–208). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.