This article examines some of the more problematic aspects of recent efforts to integrate psychology and religion. Specifically, many religious people—psychology's main consumer and client—make different assumptions than many psychologists about human nature and the world. This article attempts to explicate many of these conflicting assumptions, particularly as they affect psychological methods. Therapeutic and experimental methods are frequently viewed as theologically, if not philosophically, neutral to the subject matter they are investigating. This article aims to dispel this common myth. To discover or highlight these “hidden” assumptions of traditional methods, they are first contrasted to the assumptions of interpretive practices. However, interpretive practices are themselves often viewed as theologically neutral. Consequently, psychological methods are also compared to a theistic mode of inquiry that assumes that an active God is necessary to proper investigation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. R. (2003). Psychological testing and assessment, 8th Ed.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
AllportG. (1950). The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation.New York: MacMillan.
3.
BakhtinM. (1984). Problems of Dostoyevsky's poetics.University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
4.
BeckA. T. (1999). Prisoners of hate: The cognitive basis of anger, hostility, and violence.New York: HarperCollins.
5.
BeckA. T., RushA. J., ShawB. F., & EmeryG. (1979). The cognitive therapy of depression.New York: Guildford Press.
6.
BemS., & de JongH. L. (1997). Theoretical issues in psychology: An introduction.London: Sage Publications
7.
BerginA.E. (1997). Neglect of the therapist and the human dimensions of change: A Commentary. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 4(1), 83–89.
8.
BernsteinR. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis.Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
9.
BohmanJ. (1993). New philosophy of social science.Cambridge: MIT Press.
10.
BrowningD. S., & CooperT. D. (2004). Religious thought & the modern psychologies. (2nd edition). Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
11.
ClarkD. A., BeckA. T., & AlfordB. A. (1999). Scientific foundations of cognitive theory and therapy of depression.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
CollinsG. R. (1977). The rebuilding of psychology: An integration of psychology and Christianity.Wheaton, Il: Tyndale House Publishers.
13.
CurdM., & CoverJ. A. (1998). Philosophy of science: The central issues.New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
14.
DavisE. B., & CollinsR. (2002). Scientific Naturalism. In FerngrenGary B. (Ed.) Science and religion: A historical introduction.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
15.
DescartesR. (1641/1952). Meditations on first philosophy. In Great Books of the Western World.Chicago: Encyclopedia Brittanica.
16.
DobsonJ. (1996). The new dare to discipline.Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.
17.
EvansC. S. (1989). Wisdom and humanness in psychology: Prospects for a Christian approach.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
18.
FaulconerJ. (2005). Knowledge of the other. European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counseling, and Health, 7(1-2), 49–63.
19.
FeyerabendP. (1975). Against method.London: Verso.
20.
FordD.F. (1999). Theology: A very short introduction.New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
GadamerH. G. (1975). Truth and method. (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.) (Rev. ed.). New York: Continuum. (Original work published 1960).
22.
GriffinD. R. (2000). Religion and scientific naturalism: Overcoming the conflicts.Albany: SUNY Press.
23.
Groth-MarnatG. (2003). Handbook of psychological assessment (4th ed.) New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
24.
HaslamS. A., & McGartyC. (2003). Research methods and statistics in psychology.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25.
HedgesD., & BurchfieldC. (2005). Depression and its treatment: The assumptions and implications of a conceptualization. In SlifeB., ReberJ., & RichardsonF. (Eds.), Critical thinking about psychology.Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association Books.
26.
HeelanP. A. (1983). Space-perception and the philosophy of science.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27.
HeideggerM. (1982). The basic problems of phenomenology. (Albert Hofstadter, Trans.). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
28.
HeimanG. W. (1995). Research methods in psychology.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
29.
HeldB. S. (1995). Back to reality: A critique of postmodern theory in psychotherapy.New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
30.
HonerS. M., & HuntT. C. (1987). Invitation to philosophy: Issues and options (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
31.
JamesW. (1902/1935). Varieties of religious experience.New York: Longmans, Green and Co.
32.
JamesW. (1912). Essays in radical empiricism.New York: Longman Green and Co.
33.
JanicaudD., CourtineJ., ChrétienJ, HenryM., MarionJ., and RicoeurP. (2000). Phenomenology and the “Theological Turn.” B.G. Prusak & J.L. Klosky (Trans.) New York: Fordham UP.
34.
JensenJ. P., BerginA. E., & GreavesD. W. (1990). The meaning of eclecticism: New survey and analysis of components. Professional Psychology, 21, 124–130.
35.
JonesS. L. (1994). A constructive relationship for religion with the science and profession of psychology: Perhaps the boldest model yet. American Psychologist, 3, 184–199.
36.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edition). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
37.
KvaleS. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38.
LazarusA. A. (1995). Different types of eclecticism and integration: Let's be aware of the dangers. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 5(1), 27–39.
39.
LazarusA. A., & BeutlerL. E. (1993). On technical eclecticism. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71, 381–385.
40.
LeaheyT. H. (1991). A history of modern psychology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
LevinasE. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
42.
MacIntyreA. (1984). After Virtue, 2nd ed.Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
43.
LewisC. S. (1976). A grief observed.New York: Seabury Press, Inc.
44.
MacIntyreA. (1981). After virtue.Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press (2nd edition 1984).
45.
MarionJ. (1997). Étant donné. Essai d'une phénoménologie de la donation.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
46.
MarionJ. (2000). The saturated phenomenon. In Janicaud, Dominique, Jean-François Courtine, Jean-Louis Chrétien, Michel Henry, Jean-Luc Marion, and Paul Ricoeur, Phenomenology and the “Theological Turn.” (Bernard G. Prusak and Jeffrey L. Klosky, Trans.). New York: Fordham University Press.
47.
McLenoreC. W. (1978). Can a Christian be a behaviorist?Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, 30, 45–47.
48.
MesserS. (2001). Empirically supported treatments: What's a nonbehaviorist to do? In SlifeB., WilliamsR., & BarlowS. (Eds.) Critical issues in psychotherapy: Translating new ideas into practice (pp. 3–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
49.
MonroeK. R. (1996). The heart of altruism: Perceptions of a common humanity.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
MurphyN. (1990). Theology in the age of scientific reasoning.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
51.
NickersonR. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology2(2), 175–220.
52.
O'GradyK., & RichardsS. (2005). Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Brigham Young University.
53.
PackerM. J., & AddisonR. B. (Eds.). (1989). Entering the circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
54.
PinkerS. (1999). How the mind works.New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In ValleR.S., and HallingS. (Eds.) Existential-Phenomenological Perspectives in Psychology (pp. 3–16). NY: Plenum.
57.
ReinselR. (1994). Parapsychology: An empirical science. In: SlifeB., (Ed.) Taking Sides: Clashing views on controversial psychological issues (8th ed., pp. 362–371). Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group. (Reprinted from Philosophy of science and the occult (2nd ed., pp. 187–201). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1990.)
58.
RichardsP. S., & BerginA. E. (2004). A theistic spiritual strategy for psychotherapy. In RichardsP.S., & BerginA. E. (Eds.) Casebook for a spiritual strategy in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 1–32). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
59.
RichardsP. S., & BerginA. E. (2005). A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
60.
RichardsonF. C., FowersB. J., & GuignonC. B. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61.
RicoeurP. (1981). Hermeneutics & the human sciences.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62.
RortyR. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
RuleJ. B. (1997). Theory and progress in social science.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Russell (2002). The conflict of science and religion. In FerngrenGary B. (Ed.) Science and religion: A historical introduction.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
66.
RychlakJ. F. (1981). Introduction to personality and psychotherapy: A theory-construction approach (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
67.
RychlakJ. F. (1994). Logical learning theory: A human teleology and its empirical support.Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.
68.
SandersJ. (1994). Historical considerations. In PinnockC. (Ed.), The openness of God. (pp. 59–100). Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity Press.
69.
SchwandtT. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretive approaches to human inquiry. In DenzinN.K., & LincolnY.S. (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
70.
SkinnerB. F. (1976). Walden Two.New York, NY: Macmillan.
71.
ShaverR. (1998). Rational egoism: A selective and critical history.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
SlifeB. D. (2000a). Are discourse communities incommensurable in a fragmented psychology? The possibility of disciplinary coherence. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 21(3), 261–271.
73.
SlifeB. D. (2000b). Hedonism: A hidden unity and problematic of psychology. General Psychologist, 35(3), 77–80.
74.
SlifeB. D. (2004). Theoretical challenges to therapy practice and research: The constraint of naturalism. In LambertM. (Ed.) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change.New York: Wiley.
75.
SlifeB. D. (2005). Are the natural science methods of psychology compatible with theism? In DueckA., and LeeC. (Eds.), Why psychology needs theology? A radical reformation perspective. pp. 163–184. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing.
76.
SlifeB. D., & HopkinsR. H. (2005). Alternative assumptions for neuroscience: Formulating a true monism. In SlifeB.D., ReberJ., & RichardsonF. (Eds.), Critical thinking about psychology. pp. 121–147. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association Press.
77.
SlifeB.D., MitchellL.J., & WhooleryM. (2004). A theistic approach to therapeutic community: Non-naturalism and the All-dredge Academy. In RichardsP.S., & BerginA.E. (Eds.). Casebook for a spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy.Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
78.
SlifeB. D., & ReberJ. (2001). Eclecticism in psychotherapy: Is it really the best substitute for traditional theories? In SlifeB., WilliamsR., & BarlowS. (Eds.) Critical issues in psychotherapy: Translating new ideas into practice (pp. 213–234). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
79.
SlifeB.D., ReberJ., & RichardsonF. (2005). Critical thinking about psychology: Hidden assumptions and plausible alternatives.Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association Press.
80.
SlifeB.D., & RichardsS. (April, 2005). Toward a theistic approach to psychological method. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychology of Religion, Columbus, Maryland.
81.
SlifeB. D., SmithA. F., & BurchfieldC. (2003). Psychotherapists as crypto-missionaries: An exemplar on the crossroads of history, theory, and philosophy. In HillD. B., & KralM. J. (Eds.) About psychology: Essays at the crossroads of history, theory, and philosophy. pp. 55–72. Albany: SUNY Press.
82.
SlifeB. D., & WilliamsR. N. (1995). What's behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
83.
SlifeB. D., WilliamsR. N., & BarlowS. H. (2001). Critical issues in psychotherapy: Translating new ideas into practice.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
84.
SlifeB. D., YancharS., & WilliamsB. (1999). Conceptions of determinism in radical behaviorism: A taxonomy. Behavior & Philosophy, 27, 75–96.
85.
SpilkaB., HoodR.W., HunsbergerB., GorsuchR. (2003). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach.New York: Guildford Press.
86.
StrickerG. (2001). An introduction to psychotherapy integration. Psychiatric Times, 28(7).
87.
TaylorC. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
88.
TaylorC. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89.
ToulminS. (1972). Human understanding.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
90.
VanderStoepS. W. (2003). Science and the soul: Christian faith and psychological research.New York: University Press of America.
91.
VineyW., & KingD. B. (1998). A history of psychology: Ideas and content (2nd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
92.
WacomeD.H. (2003). Evolutionary psychology. In VanderStoepS.W. (Ed.), Science and the Soul: Christian faith and psychological research. (pp. 183–208). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
93.
WilsonD. B. (2002). The historiography of science and religion. In FerngrenGary B. (Ed.) Science and religion: A historical introduction.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
