Spiritual Pollution: the Dilemma of Sociomoral Disgust and the Ethic of Love

Abstract

Within the Judeo-Christian tradition, holiness and purity traditions explicitly and extensively employ contamination metaphors to understand both sin and salvation. Thus, certain sins, or populations engaging in sins, can be experienced via disgust psychology. The use of contamination metaphors within Christianity is problematic in that disgust and love are, it is argued, opposed psychological processes. Thus, the deployment of contamination metaphors within Christianity may, unintentionally, undermine the Christian ethic of love. However, the New Testament offers illustrative episodes where contamination metaphors were suspended to allow love the victory over disgust psychology. In the end, religious communities are asked to monitor contamination metaphors so they may intentionally manage the social and ethical implications of erecting sociomoral boundaries.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Belo

(1981). A materialist reading of the gospel of Mark. Mary Knoll, NY: Orbis Books.

Brueggemann

(1997). Theology of the Old Testament: Testimony, dispute, advocacy. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Cohen

A. B.

, Siegel

, & Rozin

(2003). Faith versus practice: Different bases for religiosity judgments by Jews and Protestants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 287–295.

Cohen

A. B.

, & Rozin

(2001). Religion and the morality of mentality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 697–710.

Darwin

(1872/1965). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ekman

, & Friesen

W. V.

(1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 17, 124–129.

Fallon

A. E.

, Rozin

, & Pliner

(1984). The child's conception of food: The development of food rejections with special reference to disgust and contamination sensitivity. Child Development, 55, 566–575.

Haidt

, McCauley

C. R.

, & Rozin

(1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713.

Haidt

, Rozin

, McCauley

, & Imada

(1997). Body, psyche, and culture: The relationship between disgust and morality. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9, 107–131.

10.

Lakoff

, & Johnson

(1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

11.

Lakoff

, & Johnson

(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.

12.

Miller

W. I.

(1997). The anatomy of disgust. Cambrigde, MA: Harvard University Press.

13.

Nemeroff

, & Rozin

(2000). The makings of the magical mind. In Rosengren

K. S.

, Johnson

C. N.

, & Harris

P. L.

(Eds.). Imagining the impossible: magical, scientific, and religious thinking in children. (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Nussbaum

M. C.

(2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Rozin

, & Fallon

A. E.

(1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94, 23–41.

16.

Rozin

, Haidt

, & McCauley

C. R.

(2000). Disgust. In Lewis

, & Haviland-Jones

J.M.

(Eds.), Handbook of emotions, Second edition (pp. 637–653). New York: Guilford Press.

17.

Rozin

, Lowery

, Imada

, & Haidt

(1999). The CAD hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.

18.

Rozin

, Millman

, & Nemeroff

(1986). Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 703–712.

19.

Singer

(1981). The expanding circle: Ethics and sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.