The present study investigated how psychopathology, current object relations, and spiritual development relate to short-term missionary performance and psychological distress. Forty short-term missionaries completed questionnaires measuring psychopathology, object relations, and spirituality before going overseas. Participants and their supervisors completed questionnaires assessing performance and psychological distress before returning home. Principle components analyses revealed three self-report performance factors and four supervisorreport performance factors. Zero-order correlations showed that having greater psychological symptomatology, greater conflict with authority, more social alienation, less satisfying relationships with peers, overly dependent relationships, and greater disappointment and instability in relationship with God were related to less effective performance. Partial correlations also showed that having greater psychological symptomatology was related to increased psychological distress. It was concluded that short-term missionaries' levels of psychopathology, object relations development, and spiritual development influence their effectiveness and psychological adjustment on the mission field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdeneyM. (1996, November 11). McMission.Christianity Today, 40, 14.
2.
ArthurW., & BennettW. (1995). The international assignee: The relative importance of factors perceived to contribute to success.Personnel Psychology, 48, 99–114.
3.
BlackJ. S., & GregersenH. B. (1991). Antecedents to cross-cultural adjustment for expatriates in Pacific Rim assignments.Human Relations, 44(5), 497–515.
4.
BoyleJ. C. P. (1994). Use of the 16PF to determine a personality profile for successful overseas missionaries (Doctoral dissertation, The Union Institute, 1994).Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 4B.
5.
BrittW. G. (1980). Pretraining variables in the prediction of missionary success overseas.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11(3), 203–212.
6.
BuelowG., McClainM., & McIntoshI. (1996). A new measure for an important construct: The Attachment and Object Relations Inventory.Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(3), 604–623.
7.
DerogatisL. R., & MelisaratosN. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report.Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605.
8.
DickenC. (1969). Predicting the success of Peace Corps community development workers.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(5), 597–606.
9.
DillonD. E. (1983). Personality characteristics of evangelical missionaries as measured by the MMPI.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11(3), 213–217.
10.
FergusonL. N. (1983). Issues in missionary assessment. Journal ofPsychology and Christianity, 2(4), 25–29.
11.
FergusonL. N., KliewerD., LindquistS. E., WilliamsD. E., & HeinrichR. P. (1983). Candidate selection criteria: A survey.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11(3), 243–251.
12.
GrahamJ. R. (2000). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
GreekS. (1984). A comparison of missionary apprentice effectiveness and performance on selected MMPI research scales. Unpublished master's thesis, Abilene Christian University, Abilene, TX.
14.
HallM. E. L. (1996). The relationship of object relations development to cultural adjustment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Biola University, La Mirada, CA.
15.
HallM. E. L., & SweatmanS. M. (2002). On the use and misuse of psychological assessment in missionary candidate evaluations.Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 21(3), 244–252.
16.
HallM. E. L., EdwardsK. J., & HallT. W. (2004). The role of spiritual development in the psychological development and cross-cultural adjustment of missionaries. Unpublished manuscript.
17.
HallT. W., & BrokawB. F. (1995). The relationship of spiritual maturity to level of object relations development and God image.Pastoral Psychology, 43(6), 373–391.
18.
HallT. W., & EdwardsK. J. (1996). The initial development and factor analysis of the Spiritual Assessment Inventory.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 24(3), 233–246.
19.
HallT. W., BrokawB. F., EdwardsK. J., & PikeP. L. (1998). An empirical exploration of psychoanalysis and religion: Spiritual maturity and object relations development.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(2), 303–313.
20.
HarrisJ. G. (1973). A science of the South Pacific: Analysis of the character structure of the Peace Corps volunteer.American Psychologist, 28, 232–247.
21.
HornerA. J. (1991). Psychoanalytic object relations therapy.Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
22.
HowardE. (1984). Personality strengths and temperament traits: Factors in continued and discontinued missionaries (overseas adaptation, adjustment). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
23.
KealeyD. J. (1989). A study of cross-cultural effectiveness: Theoretical issues, practical applications.International Journal of Inter-cultural Relations, 13, 387–428.
24.
KyneJ. N. (1992). Conflict resolution overseas: MMPI scores and overseas perseverance among missionaries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena, CA.
25.
LawsonT. T. (1993). The psychological profiles on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory of persons presenting themselves for mission service. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS.
26.
LindquistS. E. (1983). A rationale for psychological assessment of missionary candidates.Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 2(4), 10–14.
27.
MischelW. (1965). Predicting the success of Peace Corps volunteers in Nigeria.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(5), 510–517.
SchubertE. (1992). Current issues in screening and selection. In O'DonnellK. (Ed.), Missionary care: Counting the cost for world evangelization (pp. 74–88). Pasadena, CA: William Carey Library.
30.
SchubertE. (1993). Personality disorders and overseas mission: Guidelines for mental health professionals.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 21(1), 74–85.
31.
SchubertE. (1999). A suggested prefield process for missionary candidates.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 27(2), 87–97.
32.
SchubertE., & GantnerK. (1996). The MMPI as a predictive tool for missionary candidates.Journal of Psychology and Theology,24(2), 124–132.
33.
SmithM. B. (1966). Explorations in competence: A study of Peace Corps teachers in Ghana.American Psychologist, 21, 555–566.
34.
TaylorW. D., Ed. (1997). Too valauble to lose: Exploring the causes and cures of missionary attrition.Pasadena, CA: William Carey Library.
35.
TettR. P., JacksonD. N., & RothsteinM. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review.Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742.
36.
ThayerC. R. (1973). The relationship between clinical judgments of missionary fitness and subsequent ratings of actual field adjustment.Review of Religious Research, 14, 112–116.
37.
YorkJ. R. (1993). American overseas: The identification of high-risk missionary candidates. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Biola University, La Mirada, CA.
