Christian psychologists as employees of secular organizations may experience a particular values interface of their religious commitment and their workplace setting. The idiographic emphasis of this study involved data collection from a small group of Christian U.K. clinical psychologists, using repertory grid and semi-structured interview procedures, and a mix of exploratory quantitative and qualitative data analysis. The three themes reported (an added dimension to work, disclosure to colleagues and clients, and the values congruence/clash of integration) are discussed as providing illustrations of greater evocative detail than is possible from questionnaire-driven research. The aspects of the grounded theory analysis of the data are brought together in a tentative model of identity comprising constantly shifting positions on the dimensions described by the three themes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanD. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research.London: Chapman & Hall.
2.
American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.
3.
BakerM. (1999). Work, work values and religious values: How Christian clinical psychologists experience the connections. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
4.
BerginA., & JensenJ. (1990). Religiosity of psychotherapists: A national survey.Psychotherapy, 27, 3–7.
5.
BerginA., PayneI., & RichardsP. (1996). Values in psychotherapy. In ShafranskeE. (Ed.), Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (pp. 297–325). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
BeutlerL., & BerganJ. (1991). Value change in counseling and psychotherapy: A search for scientific credibility.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 16–24.
BilgraveD., & DelutyR. (1998). Religious beliefs and therapeutic orientations of clinical and counseling psychologists.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 329–349.
9.
BrierleyP. (1999). Religious trends, No. 2.London: Harper Collins.
10.
CaseP., & McMinnM. (2001). Spiritual coping and well functioning among psychologists.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 29, 29–40.
11.
CharmazK. (1995). Grounded theory. In SmithJ., HarréR., & Van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27–49). London: Sage.
12.
ChildD. (1990). The essentials of factor analysis (2nd ed.). London: Cassell
13.
CohenP. (1994). An interesting contradiction: A study of religiously committed, psychoanalytically oriented clinicians.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 22, 304–318.
14.
DunnJ., & BakerM. (2002). Formulating faith? Changes in religious schema of returned disaster relief workers.Clinical Psychology, 9, 33–36.
15.
FransellaF., & BannisterD. (1977). A manual for repertory grid technique.London: Academic Press.
16.
GallupG.Jr. (1994). The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion 1993.Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
17.
HenwoodK., & PhoenixA. (1996). ‘Race’ in psychology: Teaching the subject.Ethnic and Racial Studies, 19, 854–863.
18.
HowardN., McMinnM., BissellL., FariesS., and VanMeterJ. (2000). Spiritual directors and clinical psychologists: A comparison of mental health and spiritual values.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 28, 308–320.
19.
JensenJ., & BerginA. (1988). Mental health values of professional therapists: A national interdisciplinary survey.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 290–297.
20.
JonesS., & WilcoxD. (1993). Religious values in secular theories of psychotherapy. In WorthingtonE.Jr. (Ed.) Psychotherapy and Religious Values (pp. 37–61). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
21.
KellyG. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs.New York: Norton.
22.
KilbyR. (1993). The study of human values.Lanham, MA: University Press of America.
23.
MartinezS., & BakerM. (2000). “Psychodynamic and religious?” Religiously committed psychodynamic counselors, in training and practice.Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 13, 259–264.
24.
MitchellJ., & BakerM. (2000). Religious commitment and the construal of sources of help for emotional problems.British Journal of Medical Psychology, 73, 289–301.
ShafranskeE. (1996). Religious beliefs, affiliations, and practices of clinical psychologists. In ShafranskeE. (Ed.), Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (pp. 149–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
ShafranskeE., & MalonyH. (1990). Clinical psychologists' religious and spiritual orientations and their practice of psychotherapy.Psychotherapy, 27, 72–78.
29.
SmileyT. (2001). Clinical psychology and religion: A survey of the attitudes and practices of clinical psychologists in South East England. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey, Surrey, U.K.
30.
SmithJ. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In SmithJ., HarréR., & Van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9–26). London: Sage.
31.
SorensonR. (1994). Sea changes, interesting complements and proselytizing in psychoanalysis.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 22, 319–321.
32.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
33.
TutuD. (1994). The divine imperative. In TutuD., The rainbow people of God (pp. 53–78). London: Doubleday.
34.
WilligC. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology.Buckingham: Open University Press.
35.
WorthingtonE.Jr. (1991). Psychotherapy and religious values: An update.Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 10, 211–223.
36.
WorthingtonE.Jr., KurusuT., McCulloughM., & SandageS. (1996). Empirical research on religion and psychotherapeutic processes and outcomes: A 10-year review and research prospectus.Psychological Bulletin, 119, 448–487.
