Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2003-12
Reanalysis within a Christian Ideological Surround: Relationships of Intrinsic Religious Orientation with Fundamentalism and Right-Wing Authoritarianism
This study examined whether ideology influenced the correlations of the Intrinsic Religious Orientation Scale with Religious Fundamentalism and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. A sample of 407 undergraduates responded to these instruments along with measures of Christian Fundamentalist Beliefs, Intolerance of Ambiguity, and religious extrinsicness. Empirical procedures were used to translate Religious Fundamentalism into a more adaptive Biblical Foundationalism. Formal evaluations of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale uncovered some ideologically pro-religious items, but an even larger number of ambiguous and anti-religious statements. Partial correlations controlling for Religious Fundamentalism documented the basically adaptive potentials of a biblical intrinsicness. The Intrinsic association with authoritarianism was attributable to the ambiguous and anti-religious ideological content of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale. Ideological factors, therefore, did seem to underlie empirical suggestions that traditional Christian commitments necessarily reflect a narrow-minded authoritarian fundamentalism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W., & RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.
2.
AltemeyerB. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism.San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
3.
AltemeyerB., & HunsbergerB. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.
4.
DonahueM. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400–419.
5.
BudnerS. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29–50.
6.
EllisA. (1980). Psychotherapy and atheistic values: A response to A. E. Bergin's “Psychotherapy and religious values.”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 635–639.
7.
GeniaV. (1996). I, E, Quest, and fundamentalism as predictors of psychological and spiritual well-being. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 56–64.
8.
GhorbaniN., WatsonP. J., GhramalekiA. F., MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (2002). Muslim-Christian Religious Orientation Scales: Distinctions, correlations, and cross-cultural analysis in Iran and the United States. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 12, 73–95.
9.
GibsonH. M., & FrancisL. J. (1996). Measuring Christian fundamentalist belief among 11–15 year old adolescents in Scotland. In FrancisL. J., & CampbellW. S. (Eds.), Research in religious education (pp. 249–255). Leominster, UK: Fowler Wright.
10.
HunsbergerB. (1996). Religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and hostility toward homosexuals in non-Christian religious groups. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6, 39–49.
11.
HunsbergerB., PrattM., & PancerS. M. (1994). Religious fundamentalism and integrative complexity of thought: A relationship for existential content only?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 335–346.
12.
JelenT. G. (2000). [Review of the book Christian America? What evangelicals really want]. Review of Religious Research, 42, 215–217.
13.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1989). A psychometric analysis of the Allport-Ross and Feagin measures of religious orientation. In LynnM. L., and MobergD. O. (Eds.) Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 1 (pp. 1–31). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14.
KirkpatrickL. A., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1990). Intrinsic-Extrinsic Religious Orientation: The boon or bane of contemporary psychology of religion?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 442–462.
15.
LaytheB., FinkelD., & KirkpatrickL. A. (2001). Predicting prejudice from religious fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism: A Multiple regression approach. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 1–10.
16.
LeakG. K., & RandallB. A. (1995). Clarification of the link between right-wing authoritarianism and religiousness: The role of religious maturity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34, 245–252.
17.
MacIntyreA. (1978). Against the self-images of the age.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
18.
MaslowA. H. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.) New York: Harper Collins.
19.
MastersK. S. (1991). Of boons, banes, babies, and bath water: A reply to the Kirkpatrick and Hood discussion of intrinsic-extrinsic orientation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 312–317.
20.
McHoskeyJ. W. (1996). Authoritarianism and ethical ideology. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 709–717.
21.
NichollsJ. G., LichtB. G., & PearlR. A. (1982). Some dangers of using personality questionnaires to study personality. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 572–580.
22.
PargamentK. I. (1992). Of means and ends: Religion and the search for significance. InternationalJournal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 201–229.
23.
RobinsonJ. P., & ShaverP. R. (1973). Measures of social psychological attitudes (Rev. ed.).Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
24.
SlaterW., HallT. W., & EdwardsK. J. (2001). Measuring religion and spirituality: Where are we and where are we going?Journal of Psychology and Theology, 29, 4–21.
25.
WatsonP. J. (1993). Apologetics and ethnocentrism: Psychology and religion within an ideological surround. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 3, 1–20.
26.
WatsonP. J. (1994). Changing the religious self and the problem of rationality. In BrinthauptT. M., & LipkaR. P. (Eds.) Changing the self: Philosophies, techniques, and experiences (pp. 109–139). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
27.
WatsonP. J., FolbrechtJ., MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1990). Values, “irrationality,” and religiosity. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 18, 348–362.
28.
WatsonP. J., & GhorbaniN. (1998). Ravanshenasi din dar javame Moslemin. [Psychology of religion in Muslim society.]Qabasat, 3(2, 3) 52–71. (In Persian)
29.
WatsonP. J., GhorbaniN., DavisonH. K., BingM. N., HoodR. W.Jr., & GhramalekiA. F. (2002). Negatively reinforcing personal extrinsic motivations: Religious orientation, inner awareness, and mental health in Iran and the United States. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion.
30.
WatsonP. J., HoodR. W.Jr., & MorrisR. J. (1988). Existential confrontation and religiosity. Counseling and Values, 33, 47–54.
31.
WatsonP. J., MillironJ. T., MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1994). Religion and rationality: II. Comparative analysis of rational-emotive and intrinsically religious rationalities. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 13, 373–384.
32.
WatsonP. J., MillironJ. T., MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1995). Religion and the self as text: Toward a Christian translation of self-actualization. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 23, 180–189.
33.
WatsonP. J., MorrisR. J., FosterJ. E., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1986). Religiosity and social desirability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 25, 215–232.
34.
WatsonP. J., MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1987). Antireligious humanistic values, guilt, and self-esteem. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 26, 535–546.
35.
WatsonP. J., MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1988). Sin and self-functioning, Part 3: The psychology and ideology of irrational beliefs. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 16, 348–361.
36.
WatsonP. J., MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1989). Sin and self-functioning, Part 5: Antireligious humanistic values, individualism, and the community. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 17, 157–172.
37.
WatsonP. J., MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1993). Mental health, religion, and the ideology of irrationality. In LynnM. L., and MobergD. O. (Eds.) Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 5 (pp. 53–88). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
38.
WatsonP. J., MorrisR. J., & HoodR. W.Jr. (1994). Religion and rationality: I. Rational-emotive and religious understandings of perfectionism and other irrationalities. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 13, 356–372.
39.
WatsonP. J., MorrisR. J., HoodR. W.Jr., & FolbrechtJ. (1989). Dependency, “irrationality,” and community. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 18, 334–347.
40.
WatsonP. J., MorrisR. J., HoodR. W.Jr., MillironJ. T., & StutzN. L. (1998). Religious orientation, identity, and the quest for meaning in ethics within an ideological surround. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 8, 149–163.
41.
WestmanA. S., WillinkJ., & McHoskeyJ. W. (2000). On perceived conflicts between religion and science: The role of fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism. Psychological Reports, 86, 379–385.
