This article presents a case for faith communities to strengthen efforts to build healthy marriages during teen years through an ecological approach using individual, social network, organizational and community strategies. Community-based marriage preparation programs for engaged couples are effective in reducing divorce and distress in the early years of marriage. Extending these commitment- and skill-training efforts into teen years and linking them to positive youth development programs might increase these benefits, especially for high-risk couples. In addition, faith communities are critical catalysts in fostering support and training networks, community policy and outreach that can promote more positive environments for marriages and families. This article presents a model and suggests strategies to support early and extended outreach to build healthy marriages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmatoP.R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 1269–1287.
2.
AndersonH. (1984). The family and pastoral care.Philadelphia: Fortress Press. Cited in R.S. Anderson. (2001). The shape of practical theology. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
3.
Barna Research Group. (2002). Research Archives: Teenagers. Accessed at www.barna.org on 8-27-02.
4.
Barna Research Group. (2001a). Born Again Adults Less Likely to Co-Habit, Just as Likely to Divorce, August 6, 2001 Accessed at www.barna.org on 8-27-02.
5.
Barna Research Group. (2001b). News Release: Practical Outcomes Replace Biblical Principles As the Moral Standard, September 10, 2001. Accessed at www.barna.org on 8-27-02.
6.
BearmanP.S., & BrucknerH. (2001). Virginity pledges and first intercourse. American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 859–912.
7.
BensonP. (1997). All kids are our kids.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
BradburyT.N., FinchamF.D., & BeachS.R.H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 964–980.
10.
BridgesL.J., & MooreK.A. (2002). Religious involvement and children's well-being: What research tells us (and what it doesn't).Washington, DC: Child Trends.
11.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12.
BrowningD.S., Miller-McLemoreB.J., CoutureP.D., LyonK.B., & FranklinR.M. (1997). From culture wars to common ground: Religion and the American family debate.Louisville, KY: Westminster.
13.
Center for Marriage and Family. (1995). Marriage preparation in the Catholic Church: Getting it right.Omaha, NE: Center for Marriage and Family, University College, Creighton University.
14.
CoveyS.R. (1990). Seven habits of highly effective people.New York: Simon & Shuster.
15.
DohertyW. J. (1995). Boundaries between parent and family education and family therapy. Family Relations, 44, 353–358.
16.
EcclesJ., & GootmanJ.A. (2002). Community programn to promote youth development.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
FosheeV.A., BaumanK.E., ArriagaX.B., HelmsR.W., KochG.G., & Fletcher-LinderG. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88(1), 45–50.
18.
FournierD. G.;, & OlsonD.H. (1986). Programs for premarital and newlywed couples. In LevantR.F. (Ed.). Psychoeducational Approaches to Family Therapy and Counseling., pp. 194–231, Springer Publishing Co.
19.
FowersB.J., VeingradM.R., & DominicisC. (2002). The unbearable lightness of positive illusions: Engaged individuals’ explanations of unrealistically positive illusions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(2), 450–460.
20.
FraserM. (Ed.). (1997). Risk and resilience in childhood: An ecological perspective.Washington, DC: National Assembly of Social Workers.
21.
GarbarinoJ. (1992). Children and Families in the Social Environment. Second Edition.New York, NY: Aldine deGruyter.
22.
GardnerS. (2000). Effectiveness of Connections relationship skills program with high school students. Presentation at SmartMarriages conference, Coalition for Marriage, Family, and Couples Education. June 20, 2000, Denver, CO.
23.
GarlandD.R. (1999). Family ministry.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
24.
GlennN.D. (1991). The recent trend in marital success in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, (2), 261–270.
25.
GottmanJ.M., & NotariusC.I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 927–947.
26.
GreeleyA. (1991). Faithful Attraction: Discovering Intimacy, Love, and Fidelity in American Marriage.New York: Tor Books.
27.
HairE.C., JagerJ., & GarrettS.B. (2002). Helping teens develop healthy social skills and relationships: What research says about navigating adolescence.Washington, DC: Child Trends.
28.
Harvard Family Research Project. (2002). Evaluation of 21st Century Community Learning Center Programs.Cambridge: Harvard Family Research Project Newsletter, April 2002.
29.
HatchR.C., JamesD.E., & SchummW.R. (1986). Spiritual intimacy and marital satisfaction. Family Relations, 35(4), 539–545.
30.
HawkinsJ.D.; CatalanoR.F.; KostermanR.; AbbottR., & HillK.G. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 153, 226–234.
31.
Healthy Marriages Grand Rapids. (2002). Web site of the Grand Rapids Community Marriage Policy. Online at http://www.GGR-Cmarriagepolicy.org/
32.
HeitlandW. (1986). An experimental communication program for premarital dating couples. The School Counselor, 57–61.
33.
HuntR.A., HofL., & DemariaR. (1998). Marriage enrichment: Preparation, mentoring, and outreach.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
HustonT. L. (2000). The social ecology of marriage and other intimate unions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(2), 298–321.
35.
Institute of Medicine. (1994). Reducing risks for mental health disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36.
JohnsonC., StanleyS., GlennN., AmatoP., NockS., MarkmanH., & DionR. (2001). Marriage in Oklahoma: 2001 baseline statewide survey on marriage and divorce. (Available from the Publications Clearinghouse of the Oklahoma Department of Libraries).
37.
Kaiser Family Foundation/Children Now. (1998). Talking with Kids About Drugs, A National Survey of Parents and Kids.Menlo Park, CA: Author.
38.
KarneyB. (2001). Marriage in context: Interactions between chronic and acute stress. Presented at the National Council on Family Relations Annual Conference, Rochester, NY, November 20, 2001.
39.
KarneyB.R., & BradburyT.N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.
40.
KirbyD. (2001). Emerging Answers: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy.Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.
41.
LarsonJ.H., & HolmanT.B. (1994). Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 43, 228–237.
42.
MacgowanM. J. (1997). An evaluation of a dating violence prevention program for middle school students. Violence and Victims, 12(3), 223–235.
43.
MackD. (2000). Hungry hearts: Evaluating the new curricula for teens on marriage and relationships.New York: Institute for American Values.
44.
MarkmanH.J., StanleyS.M., & BlumbergS. (2001). Fighting for your marriage. Second Edition.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45.
McCordR. (1998). Strategies to strengthen marriage: Perspective of the Catholic Church in the U.S, pp. 73–81. In OomsT. (Ed.). Strategies to strengthen marriage: What do we know? What do we need to know?Washington, DC: Family Impact Seminar.
46.
McIntoshD. N., & SpilkaB. (1995). Religion and the family. in NeffB. R., & RatcliffD. (Eds.), Handbook of family religious education.Birmingham, AL: Religious Education press.
47.
McManusM. (1993). Marriage Savers: Helping Your Friends and Family Avoid Divorce.Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
48.
MihalicS., IrwinK., ElliottD., FaganA., & HansenD. (2001). Blueprints for violence prevention.Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Publication No. NCJ 187079.
49.
MooreK.A., & ZaffJ.F. (2002). Building a better teenager: A summary of “what works” in adolescent development.Washington, DC: Child Trends. Publication #2002–57.
50.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1997). Community Readiness for Drug Abuse Prevention: Issues, Tips and Toolspublication number PB# 97–209605. Washington, DC: NIDA. Available at http://www.secapt.org/science1crstrats.html
51.
National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign. (1999). Testing the Anti-Drug Message in 12 American Cities.National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign, Phase 1 (Report No. 2). March 1999, Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy.
OlsonD.H. (1988). Presidential address, National Council on Family Relations, November 16, 1988, Philadelphia, PA.
54.
OomsT. (1998). Strategies to strengthen marriage: What do we know, what do we need to know?Washington, DC: Family Impact Seminar.
55.
OomsT. (2001). Policy responses to couple conlict and domestic violence: A framework for discussion. In BoothA., CrouterA.C., & ClementsM. (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 227–239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
56.
OthnerD. (1990). The family in transition, pp.93–118. In BlankenhornD., BaymeS., & ElshtainJ.B. (Eds.). Rebuilding the nest: A new commitment to the American family.Milwaukee: Family Service America.
57.
RectorR. (2002). The effectiveness of abstinence education programs in reducing sexual activity among youth.Backgrounder No. 1533. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
58.
ReeseL.E., VeraE.M., SimonT.R., & IkedaR.M. (2000). The role of families and caregivers as risk and protective factors in preventing youth violence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3(1), 61–77.
59.
ReddZ., BrooksJ., & McGarveyA.M. (2002). Educating America's youth: What makes a difference?Washington, DC: Child Trends.
60.
RobinsonL.;, & BlantonP.W. (1993). Marital strengths in enduring marriages. Family Relations, 48, (1), 38–45.
61.
SAMHSA: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2003). Center for Substance Abuse Prevention model programs.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Online at: http://www.samhsa.gov/centers/csap/csap.html
62.
SanchezL., NockS.L., WilsonJ.L., & WrightJ.D. (2002). Is covenant marriage a policy that preaches to the choir? A comparison of covenant and standard newlywed couples in Louisiana. Bowling Green, OH: BGSU Center for Family and Demographic Research. Working Paper 02–06.
63.
Search Institute. (1990). Effective Christian Education: A National Study of Protestant Congregations.Search Institute: Minneapolis, MN.
64.
SengeP., KleinerA., RobertsC., RossR., RothG., & SmithB. (1999). The dance of change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in learning organizations.New York: Doubleday/Currency.
65.
ShanahanP., ElliottB., & DahlgrenN. (2002). Review of public information campaigns addressing youth risk-taking: A report to the National Youth Affairs Research Scheme.Aus: Australian Clearinghouse for Youth Studies.
66.
SillimanB. (1996). Adolescents’ Perceptions of Marriage Relationships and Enrichment Programs, Nov. 10. National Council on Family Relations Conference, Kansas City, MO.
67.
SillimanB., & SchummW.R. (2000). Marriage preparation programs: Literature review. The Family Journal, 8(2), 128–137.
68.
SillimanB., SchummW.R., & JurichA.P. (1992). Young adults’ preferences for premarital preparation program designs. Contemporary Family Therapy, 14, 89–100.
69.
SillimanB., StanleyS.M., CoffinW., MarkmanH.J., & JordanP. (2001). Preventive interventions for couples, pp. 123–146. In LiddleH., SantistebanD., LevantR., & BrayJ. (Eds.). Family Psychology Intervention Science.Washington, DC: APA Publications.
SmartMarriages. (2002). Legislation related to promoting marriage and Community Marriage Policies. Accessed at http://www.smartmarriages.com on August 27, 2002.
72.
StanleyS.M. (2001). Making the case for premarital training. Family Relations, 50, 272–280.
73.
StanleyS.M., & MarkmanH.J. (1997). Marriage in the 90s: A nationwide random phone survey.Denver, CO: PREP, Inc.
74.
StanleyS.M., MarkmanH.J., PetersM.St., LeberB.D. (1995). Strengthening marriages and preventing divorce: New directions in prevention research. Family Relations, 44(3), 392–401.
75.
StanleyS.M., MarkmanH.J., PradoL.M., Olmos-GalloP.A., TonelliL., PetersM.St., LeberB.D., BobulinskiM., CordovaA., & WhittonS.W. (2001). Community-based premarital preparation: Clergy and lay leaders on the front lines. Family Relations, 50(1), 67–76.
76.
StanleyS.M., & TrathenD. (1994). Christian PREP: An empirically based model for marital and premarital intervention. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 13, 158–165.
77.
StanleyS.M., TrathenD., McCainS., BryanM. (1998). A lasting promise.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
78.
Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1999, No. 163, Marriages and Divorces—Number and Rate, by State: 1980 to 1996, p. 114.
79.
StrommenM.P., & HardelR.A. (2000). Passing on the faith: A radical new model.Winona, MN: St. Mary's Press.
SullivanK.T., & BradburyT.N. (1997). Are premarital programs reaching couples at risk for marital dysfunction?Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 65, 24–30.
82.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2002a). State policies to promote marriage: Preliminary report.Washington, DC: DHHS March 2002. Online at http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/hsp/marriage02/
83.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2002b). Strengthening healthy marriages: A compendium of approaches.Washington, DC: DHHS Draft, August 2002.
84.
U.S. House of Representatives. (2003). Personal Responsibility, Work, and Family Promotion Act of 2003 (Introduced as H.R. 4). Online at: http://www.congress.gov
85.
WaiteL., & GallagherM. (2000). The case for marriage.New York: Doubleday.
86.
WaiteL.J., BrowningD., DohertyW.J., GallagherM., LuoY, & StanleyS.M. (2002). Does Divorce Make People Happy? Findings from a Study of Unhappy Marriages.New York: Institute for American Values.
87.
WhiteheadB.D., & PopenoeD (2001). The state of our unions: The social health of marriage in America.New Brunswick, NJ: The National Marriage Project, Rutgers: The State University of New Jersey.
88.
WhiteheadB.D., & PopenoeD. (1999). Changes in teen attitudes toward marriage, cohabitation and children, 1975 – 1995.New Brunswick, NJ: The National Marriage Project, Rutgers: The State University of New Jersey.
89.
ZaffJ., CalkinsJ., BridgesL.J., & MargieN.G. (2002). Promoting positive mental and emotional health in teens: Some lessons from research.Washington, DC: Child Trends.
