Scarcely a decade old, evolutionary psychology (EP) has developed a high profile within the cognitive sciences. EP's niche involves what David Marr (1982) called “computational theories:” functional descriptions of what information processing devices, including brains, are designed to do. Such theories constrain and inform the search for cognitive and neural descriptions of the device. EP is characterized by primary commitments to modularity of mind, the use of evolutionary biology's adaptationist program to generate hypotheses regarding mental modules, and the use of cognitive science's methods for testing such hypotheses. It is also characterized by a number of secondary commitments and positions on important issues that are not necessitated by the evolutionary approach. These are defensible within the broader fields of human behavior and cognition, and by tertiary commitments that are logically unrelated to the EP program but nonetheless characteristic of the field (i.e., anti-theistic biases and other strong reductionisms). EP has much to offer. Combining the conceptual methods of evolutionary biology and the empirical methods of the cognitive sciences seems genuinely promising, but it's rhetoric is strong for an immature discipline and its reductionism pits it against disciplines with which it might productively coexist. The primary (and even secondary) commitments are not antithetical to an orthodox Christian faith, but the anti-theistic and anti-religious tendencies of some vocal protagonists represent a challenge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyalaF. J. (1998). Human nature: One evolutionist's view. In BrownW. S., MurphyN., & MalonyH. (Eds.), Whatever happened to the soul: Scientific and theological portraits of human nature.Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.
2.
Baron-CohenS. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of autism: Evolutionary approaches. In GazzanigaM. (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Baron-CohenS., LeslieA. M., & FrithU. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?Cognition, 21, 37–46.
4.
BatesonP. (2000). Taking the stink out of instinct. In RoseH., and RoseS. (Eds.), Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology.New York: Harmony Books.
5.
BeheM. J. (1996). Darwin's black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution.New York: Simon & Schuster.
6.
BonhoefferD. (1937/1963). The cost of discipleship.New York: Macmillan.
7.
BrownW. S. (1998). Cognitive contributions to soul. In BrownW. S., MurphyN., & MalonyH. N. (Eds.), Whatever happened to the soul? Scientific and theological portraits of human nature.Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
8.
BrownW. S., MurphyN., & MalonyH. (Eds.). (1998). Whatever happened to the soul: Scientific and theological portraits of human nature.Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
9.
CarlsonR. F. (Ed.). (2000). Science & Christianity: Four views.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
10.
CataniaA. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
11.
ChomskyN. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
ChurchlandP. S., & SejnowskiT. J. (1992). The computational brain.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
13.
CosmidesL. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.Cognition, 31, 187–276.
14.
CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part II. Case study: A computational theory of social exchange.Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 51–97.
15.
CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In BarkowJ., CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture.New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (1995). From function to structure: The role of evolutionary biology and computational theories in cognitive neuroscience. In GazzanigaM. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of social reasoning. In GazzanigaM. (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
CrickF. H. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul.New York: Simon & Schuster.
20.
CrippenT., & MachalakR. (1989). The evolutionary foundations of the religious life.International Review of Sociology, 3, 61–84.
21.
DamasioA. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain.New York: G. P. Putnam.
22.
DavidsonD. (1970). Essays on actions and events. In FosterL., and SwansonJ. W. (Eds.), Experience and theory.Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.
23.
DarwinC. (1859/1964). On the origin of species.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
DawkinsR. (1976). The selfish gene.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
DawkinsR. (1986). The blind watchmaker.Harlow, U.K.: Longman.
26.
DennettD. C. (1987). The intentional stance.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
DennettD. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meaning of life.New York: Simon & Schuster.
28.
EcclesJ. C. (1989/1991). Evolution of the brain: Creation of the self.New York: Routledge.
29.
EldridgeN., & GouldS. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In SchopfT. J. M. (Ed.), Models of paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper.
30.
FodorJ. (1998a, January 15). The trouble with psychological Darwinism.London Review of Books, 20(2). Retrieved December 19, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v20n02/fodo2002.html
GouldS. J. (2000). More things in heaven and earth. In RoseH., and RoseS. (Eds.), Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology.New York: Harmony Books.
HareR. M. (1952). The language of morals.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37.
Herrnstein SmithB. (2000). Sewing up the mind: The claims of Evolutionary Psychology. In RoseH., and RoseS. (Eds.), Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology.New York: Harmony Books.
38.
HubelD. H., & WeiselT. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.Journal of Physiology (London).195, 215–243.
39.
KandelE. R., SchwartzJ. H., & JessellT. M. (1991). Principles of neural science (3rd ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
40.
KauffmanS. A. (1993). The origins of order : Self-Organization and selection in evolution.New York: Oxford University Press
41.
KimJ. (1993). Supervenience and mind.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
KimJ. (1996). Philosophy of mind.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
43.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1999). Toward an evolutionary psychology of religion and personality.Journal of Personality, 67, 921–952.
44.
LashleyK. S. (1929). Brain mechanisms and intelligence.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
LeDouxJ. E. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life.New York: Simon & Schuster.
46.
LeDouxJ. E., CicchettiP., XagorarisA., & RomanskiL. M. (1990). The lateral amygdaloid nucleus: Sensory interface of the amygdala in fear conditioning.Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 1062–1069.
47.
LeslieA. M. (2000). “Theory of mind” as a mechanism of selective attention. In GazzanigaM. (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
MackayD. M. (1991). The open mind and other essays: A scientist in God's world.Leicester: InterVarsity.
49.
MarrD. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information.San Francisco: Freeman.
50.
McClellandJ. L., & RumelhartD. E. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vols. 1, 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
MeyerS. C. (2000). Qualified agreement: Modern science and the return to the “God hypothesis.” In CarlsonR. F. (Ed.), Science & Christianity: Four views.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
52.
MurphyN. (1997). Divine action in the natural order: Buridan's ass and Schrödinger's cat. In RusselR. J., MurphyN., & PeacockeA. R. (Eds.), Chaos and complexity: Scientific perspectives on divine action.Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications.
53.
MurphyN. (1998). Nonreductive physicalism: Philosophical issues. In BrownW. S., MurphyN., & MalonyH. N. (Eds.), Whatever happened to the soul? Scientific and theological portraits of human nature.Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
54.
PaleyW. (1802). Natural theology; or, evidences of the existence and attributes of the deity collected from the appearances of nature.London: Printed for R. Faulder.
55.
PeacockeA. (1993). Theology for a scientific age: Being and becoming—natural, divind, and human, (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
56.
PinkerS. (1997). How the mind works.New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
57.
PlotkinH. (1998). Evolution in mind: An introduction to evolutionary psychology.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
PortR. F., & van GelderT. (Eds.). (1995). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59.
PremackD., and WoodruffG. (1978). Does a chimpanzee have a theory of mind?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 512–526.
60.
RamachandranV. S., & BlakesleeS. (1998). Phantoms in the brain: Probing the mysteries of the human mind.New York: William Morrow.
61.
RoseH. (2000). Colonizing the social sciences? In RoseH., and RoseS. (Eds.), Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology.New York: Harmony Books.
RosensweigM. (1996). Aspects of the search for neural mechanisms of memory.Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 1–32.
64.
ShepardR. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imaging, thinking and dreaming.Psychological Review, 91, 417–447.
65.
ShepardR. N. (1987). Evolution of a mesh between principles of the mind and regularities in the world. In DupreJ. (Ed.), The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
ToobyJ., & CosmidesL. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In BarkowJ., CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture.New York: Oxford University Press.
68.
ToobyJ., & CosmidesL. (1997). Letter to the Editor of The New York Review of Books on Stephen Jay Gould'sDarwinian Fundamentalism (June 12, 1997), and Evolution: The pleasures of pluralism (June 26, 1997). Retrieved December 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://cogweb.english.ucsb.edu/Debate/CEP_Gouldhtml.
69.
ToobyJ., & CosmidesL. (2000). Toward mapping the evolved functional organization of mind and brain. In GazzanigaM. (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70.
ToobyJ., & DeVoreI. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid evolution through strategic modeling. In KinzeyW. G. (Ed.), The evolution of human behavior: Primate models.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
71.
WasonP. (1966). Reasoning. In FossB. M. (Ed.), New horizons in psychology.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
72.
WilliamsG. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
73.
WilsonE. O. (1998). Conscilience: The unity of knowledge.London: Little Brown.
74.
YanceyP. (1998, January/February). Nietzsche was right.Books & Culture, 14–17.
