This article seeks to integrate Wesleyan spirituality with psychology and clinical practice. Three particular aspects in the Wesleyan tradition are explored: human freedom, the doctrine of sanctification, and religious affections. The thesis of this article is that all three key points can be well integrated into psychology and clinical practice. The following clinical implications are proposed: God-given human freedom empowers the client and therapist; healthy relationships are seen as a critical measure of spiritual maturity; and religious affections are seen to contribute to psychological health in their ability to experientially build character. Correlation between Wesley's focus on mature relationships and certain emphases in object relations theory are also proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. (1979). More than redemption: A theology of Christian counseling.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
2.
BrokawB. F., & EdwardsK. J. (1994). The relationship of God image to level of object relations development.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 22, 352–371.
3.
CashdanS. (1988). Object relations therapy: Using the relationship.New York: W.W. Norton.
4.
ClapperG. S. (1989). John Wesley on religious affections: His views on experience and emotion and their role in the Christian life and theology.Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
5.
CobbJ. B. (1995). Grace and responsibility.Nashville: Abingdon.
6.
CollinsK. L. (1998). John Wesley's topography of the heart: Dispositions, tempers, and affections.Methodist History, 36(3), 162–175.
7.
CunninghamN. (1994). Dancing with the spirit: Personal transformations of self-other-God images (Doctoral dissertations, University of Texas at Austin).Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 1506A.
8.
DaimW. (1963). Depth psychology and salvation (K. F. Reinhardt, Trans.). New York: Ungar.
9.
EricksonM. J. (1985). Christian theology.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
10.
FosterR. J. (1988). Celebration of discipline: The path to spiritual growth (Rev. ed.). San Francisco: Harper.
11.
FreudS. (1957). Beyond the pleasure principle. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 18, pp. 1–65). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1920)
12.
GonzalezJ. L. (1971). A History of Christian Thought (Vol. 2). Nashville, TN: Abingdon.
13.
GreerR. A. (1989). The fear of freedom: A study of miracles in the Roman imperial church.University Park, Pennsylvania.
14.
GunterW. S., JonesS. J., CampbellT. A., MilesR. L., & MaddoxR. L. (1997). Wesley and the quadrilateral: Renewing the conversation.Nashville: Abingdon.
15.
HallT. W., & BrokawB. F. (1995). The relationship of spiritual maturity to level of object relations development and God image.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 43(6), 373–391.
16.
HallT. W. (1997). The relationship of spiritual maturity to level of object relations development and God image and the impact of spiritual direction on these variables. (Doctoral dissertation, Rosemead School of Psychology, 1997).Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 5360.
17.
HarveyVan A. (1964). A handbook of theological terms.New York: Collier.
18.
HendersonD. M. (1992). Christian education: Instructional theology. In CarterC. W. (Ed.), A contemporary Wesleyan theology, Vol. 2 (pp. 833–873). Salem: Schmul.
19.
JohnsonH. (1996). Connection with God: Tapping spiritual belief for therapeutic gain. (Doctoral dissertation, Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 1996).Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 5330B.
20.
KernbergO. (1976). Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis.New York: Jason Aronson, Inc.
21.
LaMotheR. (1999). Faith as a vital concern in human development: structuring subjectivity and intersubjectivity.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 27, 230–240.
22.
LandS. J. (1994). Pentecostal spirituality: A passion for the kingdom.Sheffield: Sheffield.
23.
LindstromH. (1981). Wesley And sanctification.Wilmore: Asbury.
24.
MaddoxR. L. (1998). Reconnecting the means to the end: A Wesleyan prescription for the Holiness Movement.Wesleyan Theological Journal, 33(2), 29–66.
25.
OdenT. C. (1994). John Wesley's scriptural Christianity.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
26.
OutlerA. C. (Ed.). (1964). John Wesley.New York: Oxford.
27.
OutlerA. C. (1980). The place of Wesley in the Christian tradition. In RoweK. E. (Ed.), The place of Wesley in the Christian tradition (pp. 11–38). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
28.
PargamentK. J., GrevengoedN., HathawayW., KennellJ., NewmanJ., & JonesW. (1988). Religion and problem-solving: three styles of coping.Journal for the scientific Study of Religion, 27, 90–104.
29.
PargamentK. J. (1997). The Psychology of religion and coping.New York: Guilford.
30.
ParkerS. (1999). Hearing God's Spirit: Impacts of developmental history on adult religious experience.Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 18, 153–163.
31.
RubensR. L. (1994). Fairbairn's structural theory. In GrotsteinJ. S., & RinsleyD. B. (Eds.), Fairbairn and the origins of object relations (pp. 151–173). New York: Guilford.
32.
RyanE., & BellM. (1984). Changes in object relations from psychosis to recovery.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 209–215.
33.
SheltonR. L. (1992). Initial salvation: The redemptive grace of God in Christ. In CarterC. W. (Ed.), A contemporary Wesleyan theology, Vol. 1 (pp. 473–516). Salem: Schmul.
34.
ScharffJ., & ScharffD. (1992). Scharff notes: A primer of object relations therapy.North Vale, NJ: Jason Aronson, Inc.
35.
SkinnerB. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity.New York: Knopf.
36.
St. ClairM. (1986), Object relations and self psychology: An introduction.Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
37.
StarkeyL. (1962). The work of the Holy Spirit: A study in Wesleyan theology.New York: Abingdon.
38.
StruppH. H., & BinderJ. (1984). Psychotherapy in a new key.New York: Basic.
39.
SynanV. (1971). The Holiness-Pentecostal movement in the United States.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
40.
TaylorR. S. (1992). Historical and modern significance of Wesleyan theology. In CarterC. W. (Ed.), A contemporary Wesleyan theology, Vol. 1 (pp. 55–71). Salem: Schmul.
41.
ThompsonR. (1992). Social involvement: The responsibility of God's people. In CarterC. W. (Ed.), A contemporary Wesleyan theology, Vol. 2 (pp. 693–732). Salem: Schmul.
42.
TuttleR. (1984). The Wesleyan tradition. In W. Elwell, Evangelical dictionary of theology.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
43.
WesleyJ. (1952). A plain account of Christian perfection.London: Epworth.
44.
WesleyJ. (1985). On predestination. In OutlerA. C. (Ed.), The works of John Wesley (Vol. 2) (pp. 419–421). Nashville: Abingdon.
45.
WesleyJ. (1986). On working out our own salvation. In OutlerA. C. (Ed.), The works of John Wesley (Vol. 3) (pp. 199–209). Nashville: Abingdon.
46.
WesleyJ. (1987). On love. In OutlerA. C. (Ed.), The works of John Wesley (Vol. 4) (pp. 378–388). Nashville: Abingdon.
47.
WesleyJ. (1989a). General rules and rules of the band societies. In DaviesR. E. (Ed.), The works of John Wesley (Vol. 9) (pp. 67–75). Nashville: Abingdon.
48.
WesleyJ. (1989b). Rules of the Band Societies. In DaviesR. E. (Ed.), The Works of John Wesley (Vol. 9) (pp. 77–79). Nashville: Abingdon.
49.
WesleyJ. (1991). Journals from October 14, 1735 to November 29, 1745. In JacksonT. (Ed.), The works of John Wesley (Vol. 1). London: Wesleyan Methodist; reprinted Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
50.
WillardD. (1991). The Spirit of the disciplines: Understanding how God changes lives.SanFrancisco: Harper.
51.
WilliamsC. W. (1960). John Wesley's theology today: A study of the Wesleyan tradition in the light of current theological dialogue.Nashville: Abingdon.
52.
WynkoopM. B. (1967). Foundations of Wesleyan-Arminian theology.Kansas City, MO: Beacon.
