A clash exists between the established norms and rules for doing scientific research and the personal convictions and experiences of psychologists of religion. This complex issue is approached from a critical, hypothetical realist perspective with regard to epistemological concerns when approaching the topic of the transcendent. The impact of personal religious experience on the work of the clinician/researcher in the psychology of religion is explored; various perspectives on scientifically investigated religious phenomena seem most advantageous, as is present within research teams with diverse membership. In addition, the evolution of the philosophy of scientific knowledge is discussed in light of these topics. Finally, conclusions regarding the ideal attitudes and competencies of psychologists of religion are proferred.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrechtC. (1974). Das mystische wort: Erleben und sprechen in versunkenheit [The mystical word: Experiencing and speaking in a state of being immersed deeply]. Fischer-BarnicolH. A. (Ed.). Mainz, FRG: M. Grünwald.
2.
AlbrightJohn R. (1997). Chaos and complexity: Scientific perspectives on divine action.Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 32(3), 433–435.
3.
AshbrookJ. B., & AlbrightC. R. (1999). The humanizing brain: An introduction.Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 34(1), 7–43.
4.
BaarsB. J. (1997). In the theater of consciousness: The workspace of the mind.New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BannerM. C. (1990). The justification of science and the rationality of religious belief.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
BatsonC. D., SchoenradeP., & VentisW. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective (Rev. ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
BaukeH. (1911). Aufgabe und methode der religionspsychologie [Objective and method of the psychology of religion].Zietschrift für Religionspsychologie, 5(3), 97–104.
8.
BeileH. (1999). Religious emotions and religious development. In ReichK. H., OserF., & ScarlettW. G. (Eds.), Being human: The case of religion, Vol. 2. Psychological studies on spiritual and religious development (pp. 115–141). Lengerich, FRG: Pabst Scientific Publishers.
9.
Beit-HallahmiB. (1989). Prolegomena to the psychological study of religion.London: Associated University Press.
10.
BelzenJ. A. (1995). Sketches for a family portrait of psychology of religion at the end of modernity.The Journal of Psychology of Religion, 4–5, 89–122.
11.
BelzenJ. A. (1997a). How to assess the identity of the psychology of religion. In BelzenJ. A., & WikströmO. (Eds.), Taking a step back: Assessments of the psychology of religion (pp. 17–35). Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
12.
BelzenJ. A. (Ed.). (1997b). Hermeneutical approaches in psychology of religion.Atlanta, GA: Rodopy.
13.
BensonP. L. (1992). Patterns of religious development in adolescence and adulthood.Newsletter, American Psychological Association, Division36, 17(2), 2–9.
14.
BerginA. E. (1991). Values and religious issues in psychotherapy and mental health.American Psychologist, 46(4), 394–403.
15.
BernsteinR. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism.Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
16.
BevanW. (1991). Contemporary psychology: A tour inside the onion.American Psychologist, 46(5), 475–483.
17.
BoyerP. (1994). The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
18.
BrownW. S., MurphyN., & MalonyN. (Eds.). (1998). Whatever happened to the soul? Scientific and theological portraits of human nature.Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress.
19.
ClayR. A. (1996). Psychologists' faith in religion begins to grow.The APA Monitor, 27(8) 1, 48.
20.
ClaytonP. (1997a). Philosophy of science: What one needs to know.Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 32(1), 95–104.
21.
ClaytonP. (1997b). Inference to the best explanation.Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 32(3), 377–391.
22.
ClaytonP., & KnappS. (1992). Rationality and Christian self-conceptions. Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences (CTNS)Bulletin (Berkeley, CA), 12(2), 9–15.
23.
ClouseB. (1997). “Can two walk together, except they be agreed”?: Psychology and theology—A journey together or paths apart?Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25(1), 38–48.
24.
DawesR. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth.New York: Free Press.
25.
de BoerT. (1997). Inquiry into the foundations of a hermeneutical psychology: A critique of unpure reason. In BelzenJ. A. (Ed.), Hermeneutical approaches in psychology of religion (pp. 35–49). Atlanta, GA: Rodopy.
26.
DonahueM. J. (1989). Disregarding theology in the psychology of religion: Some examples.Journal of Psychology & Theology, 17(4), 329–335.
27.
DreesW. B. (1996). Religion, science, and naturalism.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
EvansC. S. (1989). Wisdom and humaneness in psychology: Prospects for a Christian psychology.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
29.
EriksonE. H. (1968). William James' terminal dream. In Youth and crises (pp. 204–207). New York: Norton.
30.
FlournoyT. (1903). Les principes de la psychologie religieuse [The principles of the psychology of religion].Archives de Psychologie, 1, 33–57.
31.
FreudS. (1960). The psychopathology of everyday life. In StraskeyJ. (Ed. and Trans.), Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 6). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1901)
32.
GothoniR. (1995). Becoming the pilgrim to be interviewed: My field research in retrospect. In HolmN. G., & BelzenJ. A. (Eds.), Sundén's role theory: An impetus to contemporary psychology of religion (pp. 27–45). Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademi.
33.
GribbinJ. (1993). In the beginning: The birth of the living universe.Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
34.
GriffinD. R., & SmithH. (1989). Primordial truth and postmodern theology.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
35.
HolmN. G., & BelzenJ. A. (1995). Sundén's role theory: An impetus to contemporary psychology of religion.Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademi.
36.
HolyoakK. J., & SpellmanB. A. (1993). Thinking.Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 265–315.
37.
HodgesD. L. (1974). Breaking a scientific taboo: Putting assumptions about the supernatural into scientific theories of religion.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13(1), 393–408.
38.
HoodR. W.Jr. (1992). A Jamesean look at self and self loss in mystical experience.The Journal of the Psychology of Religion, 1, 1–24.
39.
HoodR. W.Jr. (1995). The soulful self of William James. In CappsD., & JacobsJ. L. (Eds.), The struggle for life. A companion to William James' “The varieties of religious experience” (Monograph No. 9). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Society for the Scientific Study of Religion.
40.
HoodR. W.Jr., SpilkaB., HunsbergerB., & GorsuchR. L. (1996). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (Rev. ed.). New York: Guilford.
41.
HunterW. F. (Ed.). (1989). The case for theological literacy in the psychology of religion.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 17(4), 327–393.
42.
IngramJ. A. (1997). Modern and postmodern issues in Christian psychology: An integrative transmodern proposal.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25(3), 315–328.
43.
JamesW. (1902). The varieties of religious experience.New York: Longmans, Green, & Co.
44.
JamesW. (1909). A pluralistic universe: Hibbert lectures at Manchester College on the present situation in philosophy.London: Longman, Green, & Co.
45.
John Templeton Foundation. (1996). Who is who in theology and science.New York: Continuum.
46.
JonesJ. W. (1993). Living on the boundary between psychology and religion.Newsletter, American Psychological Association, Division 36, 18(4), 1–7.
47.
JonesS. L. (Ed.). (1992). Christian graduate training in psychology.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 20(2), 77–158.
48.
JonesS. L. (1994). A constructive relationship for religion with the science and profession of psychology: Perhaps the boldest model yet.American Psychologist, 49(3), 184–199.
49.
KamiolR., & RossM. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past.Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 593–620.
50.
KingM. B. (1991). Is scientific study of religion possible?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30(1), 108–113.
51.
KoteskeyR. L. (1991). Psychology from a Christian perspective (Rev. ed.). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
52.
LaudanL. (1990). Science and relativism: Some key controversies in the philosophy of science.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
LaudanL. (1996). Beyond positivism and relativism: Theory, method, and evidence.Boulder, CO: Westview.
54.
LongD., ElkindD., & SpilkaB. (1967). The child's conception of prayer.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6, 101–109.
55.
McGuireW. J. (1997). Creative hypothesis generating in psychology: Some useful heuristics.Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 1–30.
56.
MartyM. E. (1982). Introduction. In W. James, The varieties of religious experience (pp. VII–XXVII). New York: Penguin American Library.
57.
MurphyN. (1990). Theology and the social sciences: Discipline and antidiscipline.Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 25(3), 309–316.
58.
PrizesNobel (1999). The 1998 Nobel Prizes in science.Scientific American, 280(1), 16–18.
59.
O'Donahue (1989). The (even) bolder model. The clinical psychologist as metaphysician-scientist-practitioner.American Psychologist, 44(12), 1460–1468.
60.
OvertonW. F. (1992). The structure of developmental theory. In ReeseH. R. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 23 (pp. 10–37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
61.
OvertonW. F. (1997). Marching toward the millennium.Human Development, 40(2), 102–108.
62.
PaloutzianR. F. (1996). Invitation to the psychology of religion (Rev. ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
63.
PeacockeA. (1993). Theology for a scientific age.London: SCM Press.
64.
PolkinghomeJ. (1996). Scientists as theologians. A comparison of the writings of Ian Barbour, Arthur Peacocke, and John Polkinghorne.London: SPCK.
65.
PopperK. R. (1994). Knowledge and the body-mind problem: In defense of interaction.New York: Routledge.
66.
PrattJ. B. (1951). The religious consciousness: A psychological study.New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1920)
67.
PruyserP. W. (1960). Some trends in the psychology of religion.Journal of Religion, 40, 113–129.
68.
RamachandranV. S., & BlakesleeS. (1998). Phantoms in the brain.New York: W. Morrow & Co.
69.
RansonW. S. (1904). Studies in the psychology of prayer.American Journal of Religious Psychology, 1, 129–142.
70.
ReichK. H. (1995). The doctrine of the Trinity as a model for structuring the relations between science and theology.Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 30(3), 383–405.
71.
ReichK. H. (1997). Greift Gott in die welt ein? Von einem traditionellen zu einem neuen Christlichen verständnis? [Does God influence current events? From a traditional to a new Christian understanding?]Der Evangelische Erzieher, 49(3), 322–332.
72.
ReichK. H. (2000). The dialogue between religion and science: Which God?Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 35(1), 99–113.
73.
RosenauP. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
74.
SismondiS. (1996). Science without myth: On constructions, reality, and social knowledge.Albany, NY: State of New York University Press.
75.
SmithH. (1989). Beyond the post-modern mind (Rev. ed.). Wheaton, IL: Theophilosophical Publishing House.
76.
SmithM. B. (1994). Selfhood at risk: Postmodern perils and the perils of postmodernism.American Psychologist, 49(5), 405–411.
77.
SmolinL. (1997). The life of the cosmos.New York: Oxford University Press.
78.
SpilkaB., & BridgesR. A. (1989). Theology and psychological theory: Psychological implications of some modern theologies.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 17(4), 343–351.
79.
StannardR. (1989). Grounds for reasonable belief.Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
80.
SternbergR. J., & DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.). (1995). The nature of insight.Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
81.
TartC. (1983). States of consciousness.El Cerritos, CA: Psychological Processes.
82.
TwissS. B. (1995–1996). Revisiting and revisioning William James' account of mysticism.The Journal of the Psychology of Religion, 4–5, 123–180.
83.
Vande KempH. (1986). Dangers of psychologism: The place of God in psychology.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 14(2), 97–109.
84.
Vande KempH. (1996). Psychology and Christian spirituality: Explorations of the inner world.Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 15, 161–174.
85.
WalshR. (1993). Mysticism, contemplative and chemical.Gnosis: A Journal of the Western Inner Traditions, 26, 18–21.
86.
WaltersA., & BradleyR. (1971). Motivation and religious behavior. In StrommenM. P. (Ed.), Research on religious development: A comprehensive handbook (pp. 599–653). New York: Hawthorn.
87.
WattsF., & WilliamsM. (1988). The psychology of religious knowing.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
88.
WeinbergS. (1994). Dreams of a final theory (Rev. ed.). New York: Vintage Books.
89.
WilliamsP. S. (1993–1994). Transpersonal psychology: Where does it fit in?The Journal of Psychology, 2–3, 201–227.
90.
WilsonE. O. (1990). Biology and the social sciences.Journal of Religion and Science, 25(3), 245–262.
91.
WulffD. M. (1992). Reality: Illusion or metaphor? Reflections on the conduct and object of the psychology of religion.The Journal of the Psychology of Religion, 1, 25–51.
92.
WulffD. M. (1995). Phenomenological psychology and religious experience. In HoodR. W.Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of religious experience (pp. 183–199). Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
93.
WulffD. M. (1997). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary (Rev. ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
