The author summarizes the literature on developmental reading and writing programs by discussing strategies for addressing remedial needs and obstacles to remediation. Based on the review, the author defines 16 strategies used by community colleges to implement effective remedial programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, C. (1996). The truth about remedial work: It's more complex than windy rhetoric and simple solutions suggest. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 43(6), 56-56.
2.
Bigaj, S.J., Shaw, S.F., Cullen, J.P., McGuire, J.M., & Yost, D.S. (1995). Services for students with learning disabilities at two and four-year institutions: Are they different?Community College Review, 23(2), 217-231.
3.
Carrasquillo, A. (1986). Perceived remedial English reading class benefits of community college students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 285 127)
4.
Champaigne, J. (1981). Developmental studies program review, 1974-1981. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 206 338)
5.
Colby, A., & Opp, R. (1997). Controversies surrounding developmental education in the community colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 286 557)
6.
Commander, N.E., & Smith, B.D. (1995). Developing adjunct reading and learning courses that work. Journal of Reading, 38(5), 352-360.
7.
Conlin, S. (1989). Percentage of Southwestern Community College students bypassing remedial work and the effects on subsequent grades and dropout rate. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 317 240)
8.
Crawford, J.J. (1993) Recession and the role of developmental education: An interview with John N. Gardner. Journal of Developmental Education, 17(1), 22-24, 26-26, 41-41.
9.
Duckett, I. (1996, June 28). The American Way is sometimes confused (identifying and teaching core skills at community colleges). Times Educational Supplement, 4174, A29-A29.
10.
Garza, N.R. & Gibbs, L. (1994). A description and analysis of selected successful developmental reading programs in Texas community colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 377 912)
11.
Gose, B. (1997). Tutoring companies take over remedial teaching at some colleges. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44(4), A44-A46.
12.
Hennessey, J. (1990). At-risk community college students and a reading improvement course: A longitudinal study. Journal of Reading, 34(2), 114-120.
13.
Maxwell, M. (1997). What are the functions of a college learning assistance center? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 413 031)
14.
Moore, A. (1993). Computer-assisted instruction (ILS) for adults. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 377 897)
15.
Napoli, A. & Hiltner, G.J. (1993). An evaluation of developmental reading instruction. Journal of Developmental Education, 17, 14-16.
16.
Olson, J.E. (1995). Course based remedial reading remediation: A collaborative experiment. Reading Improvement, 32(1), 53-55.
17.
Reinertson, J. (1989). Community college reading students: Data and demographics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 307 000)
18.
Reis, E. (1992). Remedial reading students at Moraine Valley. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356 005)
19.
Roueche, J.E. (1984). Literacy needs and developments in American community colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 240 291)
20.
Roueche, S.D. (Ed.). (1996). Innovation abstracts, 18,1-29. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407 00)
21.
Seybert, J.A. & Soltz. (1992). Assessing the outcomes of developmental courses at Johnson County Community College. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349 052)
22.
Walsh, B.S. (1990). Piedmont Virginia Community College's pathways: The process of developing clusters of nondevelopmental courses for developmental students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 336 132)
23.
Yevoli, C. (1993). Corrective strategies in reading for at-risk community college students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 366 370)
