ERIC Review: Measuring Success Through Assessment and Testing

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Access, assessment and developmental education in the community college: Critical issues in the community college . (1987, June/July). Community, Technical and Junior College Journal, 57(6), 38-41.

Armstrong, B. , & Takahata, G. (1991). Student andfaculty evaluation of placement results. San Diego: San Diego Community College District. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 346 939)

Ashcroft, J. (1987). Student assessment: A measurement of achievement. Community Technical & Junior College Journal, 57(6), 5-5.

Astin, A. W. (1991). Assessmentfor excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York: American Council on Education.

Bennett, W. (1985). To reclaim a legacy. American Education, 21(1), 4-15, 23-23.

Blanzy, J. J. , & Sucher, J. E. (1992, January). Technology: The silent partner in the advancement of measurement and assessment practices (A student centered assessment model). Paper presented at the Winter Institute on Community College Effectiveness and Student Success, Jacksonville, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 342 446)

Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Bragg, A. K. (1989). Beyond the college: State policy impact on student tracking systems. In T. H. Bers (Ed.), Using student tracking systems effectively (pp. 9-19). New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 66. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper and Row.

10.

Casey, E. (1987). Accommodating testing to disabled students. In D. Bray & M. J. Belcher (Eds.), Issues in student assessment (pp. 65-74). New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

11.

Chen, H., & Associates . (1989, August). Assessing general education: Selection and implementation of an instrument to satisfy internal and external constituencies. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association for Community Colleges, Savannah, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 373 820)

12.

Cooke, B. R. (1994, April). Rethinking teaching and testing: Quality in the classroom. Paper presented at the Eastern Regional Competency-Based Education Consortium's Annual Total Quality Education Conference, Asheville, NC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 367 406)

13.

Cress, C. M., & Joyce, S. A. (1995). General education focus group report. Unpublished document. Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles.

14.

Doolittle, A. , & Welch, C. (1989). Gender differences in performance on a college-level achievement test. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 306 237)

15.

Duvall, B. (1994). Obtaining student cooperation for assessment. In T. H. Bers & M. L. Mittler (Eds.), Assessment and testing: Myths and realities (pp. 47-52). New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

16.

Florida State Postsecondary Education Planning Commission. (1989). An assessment of the general education curriculum in state universities and community colleges. Report and recommendations of the Postsecondary Education Planning Commission (report no. 4), Tallahassee, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 306 782)

17.

Foote, E. (1994). Sources and information: Assessment and the community college. In T. H. Bers & M. L. Mittler (Eds.), Assessment and testing: Myths and realities (pp. 85-94). New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

18.

Kerlin, S. P. & Britz, P. B. (1994). Assessment and diversity: Outcome and climate measurements. In T. H. Bers & M. L. Mittler (Eds.), Assessment and testing: Myths and realities (pp. 53-60). New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

19.

Kiah, C. J. (1993, November). A modelfor assessing critical thinking skills. Paper presented at the Annual Student Assessment Conference of the Virginia Assessment Group and the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia. Richmond, VA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 367 400)

20.

Knefelkamp, L. L. (1994). Assessment as transformation. Unpublished reader. Student Development Profile Packet, Summer Institute for Intercultural Communication, Forest Grove, OR.

21.

Kreider, P. E. , & Walleri, R. D. (1988). Seizing the agenda: Institutional effectiveness and student outcomes for community colleges. Community College Review, 16(2), 44-50.

22.

Massachusetts Bay Community College . (1994). Building communities by assessing the outcomes. American Association of Community and Junior Colleges, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 375 864)

23.

MacDougall, P. R. , & Friedlander, J. (Eds.). (1990). Models for conducting institutional research. New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 72. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

24.

McMillan, V. K. (1994). Assessment from the state perspective. In T. H. Bers & M. L. Mittler (Eds.), Assessment and testing: Myths and realities (pp. 5-11). New Directionsfor Community Colleges, no. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

25.

McTarnaghan, R. E. (1987). The impact of assessment on minority access. In D. Bray & M. J. Belcher (Eds.), Issues in student assessment (pp. 75-81). New Directionsfor Community Colleges, no. 59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

26.

Mittler, M. L. , & Bers, T. H. (1994a). Assessment and transfer: Unexamined complexities. In T. H. Bers & M. L. Mittler (Eds.), Assessment and testing: Myths and realities (pp. 31-36). New Directionsfor Community Colleges, no. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

27.

Mittler, M. L. , & Bers, T. H. (1994b). Qualitative assessment: An institutional reality check. In T. H. Bers & M. L. Mittler (Eds.), Assessment and testing: Myths and realities (pp. 61-67). New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

28.

Mohave Community College . (1993). Assessing student outcomes. Kingman, AZ: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 376 872)

29.

Morante, E. A. (1987). A primer on placement testing. In D. Bray & M. J. Belcher (Eds.), Issues in student assessment (pp. 55-63). New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

30.

Mortimer, K.P. (1985). Involvement in learning: What's in it for college teachers? College Teaching, 33(1), 4-4.

31.

Neff, R. (1989). Methods of evaluating students at the community college. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Mid-Career Fellowship Program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 307 936)

32.

Neosho County Community College . (1994). Assessment of student academic achievement. Chanute, KS: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 370 613)

33.

Prus, J. , & Johnson, R. (1994). A critical review of student assessment options. In T. H. Bers & M. L. Mittler (Eds.), Assessment and testing: Myths and realities (pp. 69-83). New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

34.

Raisman, N. (1994). The defacto state of general education: A study of Michigan colleges. Community College Review, 21(4), 37-47.

35.

Resnick, D. P. (1987). Expansion, quality and testing in American education. In D. Bray & M. J. Belcher (Eds.), Issues in student assessment (pp. 5-14). New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

36.

Riggs, J. R. (1990). The impact of resource allocation and general practices in shaping general education at the community college. Community College Review, 18(2), 131-145.

37.

Rubadeau, D. O., & Associates . (1990). Appropriate testing. Centre for Improved Teaching, College of New Caledonia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332 751)

38.

Scott-Skillman, T. , & Halliday, K. (1991). Matriculation assessment standards. Office of the Chancellor, California Community Colleges, Sacramento, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 329 313)

39.

Seybert, J. A. (1994). Assessment from a national perspective: Where are we, really? In T. H. Bers & M. L. Mittler (Eds.), Assessment and testing: Myths and realities (pp. 23-30). New Directionsfor Community Colleges, no. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

40.

Spangehl, S.D. (1994). Latent and leveraged benefits of assessment: Expanding the value of assessment information. In T. H. Bers & M. L. Mittler (Eds.), Assessment and testing: Myths and realities (pp. 13-21). New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

41.

Tanner, J. M. (1994, February). The value of tracking students-gather evidence about the progress along the way. Paper presented at the International Conference for Community College Chairs, Deans, and Other Instructional Leaders, Phoenix, AZ. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 368 421)

42.

Tripp, J. D. , & Webb, N. (1987). Student development in 1990: New developments in testing. Central Piedmont Community College, Charlotte, NC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 287 552)

43.

Wagner, M.L. (1989). The why and how of mandated assessment in New Jersey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Mid-Career Fellowship Program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 307 939)

44.

Welch, C., & Associates . (1989). Differential performance on a direct measure of writing skills for black and white college freshmen. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 320 955)