The Status of Tenured Faculty Evaluation in the Community College

American Association of University Professors . (1983, November/December). On periodic evaluation of tenured faculty, Academe, 69, 1a-14a.

Andrews, H. (1985). Evaluating for Excellence. Stillwater, Oklahoma: New Forum Press.

Bennett, J. B. & Chater, S. S. (1984, Spring). Evaluating the performance of tenured faculty members, Educational Record, 65, 38-41.

Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education . (1980). Three thousand futures: The next twenty years for higher education. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching . (1985). The faculty: Deeply troubled. Change, 17 31-34.

Chait, R. & Ford, A. T. (1982). Beyond traditional tenure. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

Licata, C. M. (1986). Post-tenure faculty evaluation: Threat or opportunity? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

Licata, C. M. (1988, Spring). The eye sees not itself, NEA thought and action IV, 1 49-56.

Licata, C. M. & Dowdall, J. A. (1988, June). Looking back and ahead at post-tenure evaluation: Ways to do it, if at all. Unpublished research findings presented at American Association of University Administrators National Assembly XVII, Chicago, Illinois.

Mangieri, J. N. & Arm, J. W., Jr. (1985). Excellent schools: The leadership function of principals, American Education, 21(3), 8-10.

Moses, I. (1985). What academics think about regular reviews of performance, Australian Universities Review, 28(1), 3440-3440.

Olswang, S. G. & Fantel, J. I. (1980-81). Tenure and periodic performance review: Compatible legal and administrative principles, Journal of College and University Law, 7, 1-30.

Stern, C. W. (1983, November/December). Remarks, Academe, 69, 12a-13a.