Armiger, Louise. ‘The Political Realities of Teacher Evaluation,’Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications (1981), pp. 292-302.
2.
Brock, Steven C.‘Evaluation-Based Teacher Development,’Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications (1981), pp. 229-243.
3.
Carroll, J.‘Faculty Self-Evaluation,’Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications (1981), pp. 180-200.
4.
Evertson, Carolyn M. and Freda M. Holley. ‘Classroom Observation,’Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications (1981), pp. 90-109.
5.
French-Lazovik, Grace. ‘Peer Review-Documentary Evidence in the Evaluation of Teaching,’Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications (1981), pp. 73-89.
6.
Greenwood, Gordon E. and Howard J. Ramagli, Jr.‘Alternatives to Student Ratings of College Teaching,’Journal of Higher Education, 51 (6), (Nov./Dec. 1980), pp. 673-682.
7.
Griffith, Francis. A.Handbook for the Observation of Teaching and Learning. Midland, Michigan: Pendell Publishing Company (1973), pp. 2-134.
8.
Harrell, Robert A.‘Faculty Evaluation and Staff Development at Jackson State Community College,’Conceptual Framework Paper, Jackson, Tennessee (1982).
9.
Iwanicki, Edward F.‘Contract Plans-A Professional Growth-Oriented Approach to Evaluating Teacher Performance,’Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications (1981), pp. 203-228.
10.
Kimball, Roland B.‘Six Approaches to Evaluating Teaching: A Typology,’National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 64 (434), (March 1980), pp. 41-47.
11.
King, Jean A.‘Beyond Classroom Walls-Indirect Measures of Teacher Competence,’Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications (1981), pp. 167-179.
12.
Madgic, Robert. ‘Increasing the Reliability of Evaluations by Using Classroom Products,’National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 64 (434), March 1980), pp. 12-15.
13.
McIntyre, John D.‘Administrator's Dilemma-Teacher Evaluation and the Observer Effect’National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 64 (434), (March 1980), pp. 36-37.
14.
Miller, Richard I.Evaluating Faculty Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers (1972), pp. 4-96.
15.
Miller, Richard I.Developing Programs for Faculty Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers (1974), pp. 16-66.
16.
Millman, Jason. ‘Student Achievement as a Measure of Teacher Competence,’Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications (1981), pp. 146-166.
17.
Norris, William R.‘Seven Premises for Improving Teacher Evaluation,’National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 64 (434), (March 1980), pp. 30-34.
18.
O'Hanlon, James and Lynn Mortensen. ‘Making Teacher Evaluation Work,’Journal of Higher Education, 51 (6), (Nov./Dec. 1980), pp. 664-672.
19.
Roueche, John E.Holistic Literacy in College Teaching. New York: Media Systems Corporation (1980), p. 57-57.
20.
Schriven, Michael. ‘Summative Teacher Evaluation,’Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications (1981), pp. 244-271.
21.
Thomas, Donald M.‘Performance Evaluation: Basis for Job Motivation,’National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 64 (434), (March 1980), pp. 8-11.