Breen, E., and Dulaney-Sorocha, J.Grading Policies of the Pub & c Two-Year Community Colleges in Michigan, Fall 1977. Warren, Mich.: Macomb County Community College, 1978. 19-19pp. ED 161 496.
2.
Caldwell, J. H., and Dodamead, T. E.“Non-Punitive Grading: Encouraging Academic Exploration.”Community and Junior College Journal, 43, 6 (March 1973): 29-29.
3.
California Community and Junior College Association (CCJCA). Response to Recommendations Contained in the California Postsecondary Education Commission Report Entitled Through the Open Door. Sacramento, Calif., 1977.30-30pp. ED 152 345.
4.
Cohen, A. M.Chicago Reaches Out. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Faculty Council, Chicago City Colleges, Chicago, Ill., November 30, 1979.
5.
Ebersole, J. F. A Study of the “In-Progress” Grade. Unpublished paper, 1975. 34pp. ED 104 452.
6.
Ehrlich, D. J., and Ellis, S.B. Patterns of Student Performance at LaGuardia Community College, 1971-1974. Long Island City, N.Y.: LaGuardia Community College, 1975.28-28pp. ED 104 468.
7.
Hawaii Community College System. Fall 1975 Entering Students in Fall 1976: A Comparison of Continuing and Non-Continuing Students at the Beginning of Their Third Semester. Student Flow Project, Report No. 16. Honolulu, Hawaii, 1976. 35-35pp. ED 131 879.
8.
Hawaii Community College System. Grade Distributions: Community Colleges, Fall 1976. Honolulu, Hawaii, 1977. 24-24pp. ED 135 437.
9.
Kirby, E. B.Fifiteen Most Heavily Enrolled Baccalaureate Courses, Fall 1975 Spring 1977. Report #1, 1077. Morton Grove, Ill.: Oakton Community College, 1977. 38-38pp. ED 148 447.
10.
Knoell, D. M.“Challenging the ‘Model and the Myth.”’ Community and Junior College Journal, 47, 3 (November 1976): 22-25.
11.
Knoell, D. M., and Others. Through the Open Door; A Study of Patterns of Enrollment and Performance in California's Community Colleges. Report 76-1, Sacramento: California State Postsecondary Education Commission, 1976. 82-82pp. ED 119 752.
12.
Larkin, P. G.How Many Students Are We Losing? A ttrition and Inefficiency in Instructional Operations Re-Examined. Report No. 77-11. Largo, Md.: Prince George's Community College, 1977. 30-30pp. ED 143 380.
13.
Matley, B. G. Relationship Between Grade Upon Withdrawal and Tvme of Withdrawal, for Selected Courses. Unpublished paper, 1978. 48pp. ED 153 669.
14.
Petersen, A., and Others. Community College Grading Policies. Agenda Item 5. Sacramento: California Community Colleges, Office of the Chancellor, 1979. 33-33pp. ED 178 128.
15.
Sheldon; M. S., and Hunter, R.Pierce College Longitudinal Study: First Year Report. Woodland Hills, Calif.: Pierce College, [1978]. 18-18pp. ED 161 482.
16.
Sheldon, M. S., and Hunter, R.Statewide Longitudinal Study Report on Academic Year 1978-79. Part II Spring Results. Woodland Hills, Calif.: Pierce College, 1980.
17.
Sutton, L. S. Analysis of Withdrawal Rates of Students Receiving Financial Aid at Central Florida Community College. Unpublished paper, 1975. 34pp. ED 130 700.
18.
Texas Education Agency. Course Withdrawal, Data Summary Fall 1976. Tex-SIS FOLLOW-UP: Postsecondary Student Follow-up Management Information SystemMonograph 2. Austin, Texas, 1977. 16-16pp. ED 140 905.
19.
Woods, N. A., “Non-Punitive” Grading Systems; The Experience of One College. Kalamazoo, Mich.: Kalamazoo Valley Community College, [1978]. 12-12pp. ED 156 249.