Dominant and Shadow Narratives Regarding the Desegregation of North Carolina Public Higher Education

Abstract

Objective: This article reports on a study of archival legal and administrative texts generated during desegregation litigation instituted during the 1970s to enforce Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The specific focus of the research was on North Carolina and actions taken by the University of North Carolina and the state’s Department of Community Colleges. Method: The research method guiding data collection and analysis was hermeneutics and narrative policy analysis. Results: This inquiry revealed the limited but significant role played by the state’s community colleges. Contributions: These findings illuminate the hierarchy that organizes some state’s public higher education systems and the power centers within them.

Keywords

desegregation civil rights community colleges higher education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams v. Bell, 711 F. 2d 161 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

Adams v. Bennett, 675 F. Supp. 668 (D.C. Dist. Ct. 1987).

Adams v. Richardson, 351 F. Supp. 636 (D.C. Dist. Ct. 1972).

Adams v. Richardson, 356 F. Supp. 92 (D.C. Dist. Ct. 1973a).

Adams v. Richardson, 480 F. 2d 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1973b).

Allen

W. B.

(1987). Black colleges v. White colleges. Change, 19(3), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1987.9939144

Antonovics

Brackes

(2013). Were minority students discouraged from applying to University of California campuses after the affirmative action ban? Education Finance and Policy, 8(2), 208–250. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00090

Bastedo

M. N.

Howard

J. E.

Flaster

(2016). Holistic admissions after affirmative action: Does “maximizing” the high school curriculum matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716642407

Binder

Weisberg

(2000). Literary criticisms of law. Princeton University Press.

10.

Bishop

D. W.

(1983). The consent decree between the University of North Carolina System and the U.S. Department of Education, 1981–82. The Journal of Negro Education, 52(3), 350–361. https://doi.org/10.2307/2294669

11.

Blake

(1991). Is higher education desegregation a remedy for segregation but not educational inequality? A study of the Ayers v. Mabus case. Journal of Negro Education, 60, 538–565. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295334

12.

Boddie

E. C.

(2016). The future of affirmative action. Harvard Law Review Forum, 130(1), 38–50.

13.

Bowen

W. G.

Bok

(1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton University Press.

14.

Bragg

D. D.

(2001). Community college access, mission, and outcomes: Considering intriguing intersections and challenges. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930PJE7601_06

15.

Carter

D. J.

Wilson

(1995). Minorities in higher education. American Council on Education.

16.

Chang

M. J.

Witt

Jones

Hakuta

(Eds.). (2003). Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in colleges and universities. Stanford University Press

17.

Cohen

A. M.

Brawer

F. B.

Kisker

C. B.

(2013). The American community college (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

18.

Connell

M. A.

(1993). The road to United States v. Fordice: What is the duty of public colleges and universities in former de jure states to desegregrate? Mississippi Law Journal, 62(2), 285–360.

19.

Crotty

(1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage.

20.

Davis

R. N.

(1993). The quest for equal education in Mississippi: The implications of United States v. Fordice. Mississippi Law Journal, 62(2), 405–500.

21.

DeWitt

(1979, March 27). Califano acts to end Carolina college aid on segregation issue. The New York Times, A22.

22.

Eckes

S. E.

(2004). Race-conscious admissions programs: Where do universities go from Gratz and Grutter? Journal of Law & Education, 33(1), 21–62.

23.

Edley

Jr. (1996). Not all black and white: Affirmative action and American values. Hill & Wang.

24.

Eskridge

W. N.

Jr. (1990). Gadamer/statutory interpretation. Columbia Law Review, 90(3), 609–681.

25.

Eskridge

W. N.

Jr (1994). Dynamic statutory interpretation.

26.

Feldman

S. M.

(2000). How to be critical. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 76(2), 893–912.

27.

Fischer

(1993). Reconstructing policy analysis: A postpositivist perspective. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138788

28.

Flemming

A. S.

(1981a, July 9). [Briefing Memorandum from Flemming to Smith]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 16).

29.

Flemming

A. S.

(1981b, July 10). [Letter from Flemming to Smith]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 16).

30.

Friday

(1973, May 2). [Letter from Friday to Holmes]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 5).

31.

Friday

(1977, January 21). [Memo from Friday to Members of the UNC Board of Governors]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 7).

32.

Gadamer

H. G.

(2004). Truth and method ( Weinsheimer

Marshall

D. G.

, Trans.) (2nd ed.). (Original work published 1960)

33.

Gerry

(1975, July 31). [Letter from Gerry to Holshouser]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 6).

34.

Harbour

C. P.

(2006). The incremental marketization and centralization of state control of public higher education: A hermeneutic interpretation of legislative and administrative texts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500306

35.

Harbour

C. P.

(2015). John Dewey and the future of community college education. Bloomsbury Academic Press.

36.

Harper

S. R.

Patton

L. D.

Wooden

O. S.

(2009). Access and equity for African American students in higher education: A Critical Race historical analysis of policy efforts. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(4), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2009.11779022

37.

Harvey

W. B.

Williams

L. E.

(1989). Historically Black colleges: Models for increasing minority representation. Education and Urban Society, 21(3), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124589021003007

38.

Hekman

S. J.

(1986). Hermeneutics and the sociology of knowledge. University of Notre Dame Press.

39.

Holmes

P. E.

(1973a, March 27). [Letter from Holmes to Friday]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 5).

40.

Holmes

P. E.

(1973b, November 10). [Letter from Holmes to Holshouser]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 5).

41.

Holshouser

J. E.

(1974, February 14). [Letter from Holshouser to Holmes]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 5).

42.

Hurd

Plant

V. C.

(2018). Diversity entitlement: Does diversity-benefits ideology undermine inclusion. Northwestern University Law Review, 112(6), 1605–1635.

43.

Jenkins

C. R.

(1975). A study of legal and administrative aspects of desegregation in public higher education with reference to the University of North Carolina [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Duke University.

44.

Kahlenberg

R. D.

(1996). The remedy: Class, race, and affirmative action. Basic Books.

45.

Kaplan

T. J.

(1986). The narrative structure of policy analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5(4), 761–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.4050050406

46.

Kaplan

T. J.

(1993). Reading policy narratives: Beginnings, middles, and ends. In Fischer

Forester

(Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 167–185). Duke University Press.

47.

Kujovich

(1996). Desegregation in higher education: The limits of a judicial remedy. Buffalo Law Review, 44(1), 1–69.

48.

Laws

G. L.

(1981, July 24). [Letter from Laws to Friday]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 16).

49.

McCardle

(2017). A promise deferred: Black Veterans’ access to higher education through the GI Bill at the University of Florida, 1944–1962. Educational Studies, 53(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1283504

50.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

51.

Mootz

F. J.

(1999). Law in flux: Philosophical hermeneutics, legal argumentation, and the Natural Law Tradition. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 11(1), 311–382.

52.

Moules

N. J.

(2002). Hermeneutic inquiry: Paying heed to history and Hermes—An ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100301

53.

North Carolina Association of Independent Colleges and Universities. (1985, May 10). [Letter from North Carolina Association of Independent Colleges and Universities to North Carolina Community College System]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 17).

54.

North Carolina v. HEW. Consent Decree (No. 79-217-CIV-5 1981).

55.

North Carolina v. HEW. 480 F. Supp. 929 (U.S. Dist. Ct., E.D. of N.C. 1979).

56.

Panetta

(1970, February 16). [Letter from Panetta to Scott and Herring]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 5).

57.

Patton

M. Q.

(2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.

58.

Phelps

T. G.

Pitts

J. A.

(1985). Questioning the text: The significance of phenomenological hermeneutics for legal interpretation. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 29(2), 353–382.

59.

Prasad

(2017). Crafting qualitative research (2nd ed.). Routledge.

60.

Preer

J. L.

(1982). Lawyers v. educators: Black colleges and desegregation in public higher education. Greenwood Press.

61.

President’s Commission on Higher Education. (1947). Higher education for American democracy, a report (Vol. I). U.S. Government Printing Office.

62.

Rhoads

R. A.

Valadez

J. R.

(1996). Democracy, multiculturalism, and the community college: A critical perspective. Garland Publishing.

63.

Roe

(1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Duke University Press.

64.

Samuels

A. L.

(2004). Is separate unequal? Black colleges and the challenge to desegregation. University Press of Kansas.

65.

Schwandt

T. A.

(2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In Denzin

N. D.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 189–213). Sage.

66.

Shabazz

(2004). Advancing democracy: African Americans and the struggle for access and equity in higher education in Texas. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Press.

67.

Sitterson

J. C.

(1970, March 11). [Letter from Sitterson to Friday]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 5).

68.

Stefkovich

J. A.

Leas

(1994). A legal history of desegregation in higher education. Journal of Negro Education, 63(3), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967191

69.

Tatel

(1977, July 29). [Letter from Tatel to Friday]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 7).

70.

Tatel

(1978, February 3). [Letter from Tatel to Hunt]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 8).

71.

Taylor

(1977, July 9). [Memorandum Enclosed with Letter Dated July 11, 1977 from Taylor to Friday]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 7).

72.

Thorp

(1975, October 20). [Letter from Thorp to Friday]. UNC Archives General Administration: Records of the Legal Affairs Division (#40015, Box 6).

73.

United States v. Fordice. 505 U.S. 717 (U.S. Sup Ct. 1992).

74.

Warnke

(1987). Gadamer: Hermeneutics, tradition, and reason. Stanford University Press.

75.

Weinsheimer

J. C.

(1985). Gadamer’s hermeneutics: A reading of Truth and Method. Yale University Press.

76.

Wiggs

J. L.

(1989). The community college system in North Carolina: A silver anniversary history, 1963—1988. North Carolina State Board of Community Colleges.

77.

Williams

J. B.

(1988). Title VI regulation of higher education. In Williams

J. B.

(Ed.), Desegregating America’s colleges and universities: Title VI regulation of higher education (pp. 3–53). Teachers College Press.

78.

Williams

J. B.

(1997). Race discrimination in public higher education: Interpreting federal civil rights enforcement 1964—1996. Praeger.

79.

Williamson-Lott

J. A.

(2018). Jim Crow Campus: Higher education and the struggle for a new southern social order. Teachers College Press.

80.

Willie

C. V.

(1982). The ivory and ebony towers: Race relations and higher education. Lexington Books.

81.

Willie

C. V.

(1988). Initiation of desegregation litigation: A majority or minority responsibility. In Williams

J. B.

(Ed.), Desegregating America’s colleges and universities: Title VI regulation of higher education (pp. 103–111). Teachers College Press.

82.

Yanow

(2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Sage.