Objective: Most community colleges receiving the Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI) designation have no specific mission to serve Hispanic students. The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore how receiving an HSI designation affects the identity and practices of a community college. Method: Ten years of institutional documents covering the HSI transition period and 40 individual interviews were analyzed for common identity themes and indicators of a commitment to serving Hispanic students. Results: Participants attributed no meaning to the HSI designation; however, the identity labels did have meanings associated with being Hispanic-serving. A “serving all students” ideology combined with a color-blind approach and fear of external stakeholder reaction to the HSI designation were barriers to adopting an HSI identity. Contributions: Previous studies have relied on evidence of planned change as an indicator of an HSI identity. Unplanned change, however, has received very little attention. Our study demonstrates that unplanned changes in some practices and structures did result in movement toward being more Hispanic-serving as the college attempted to serve all students. As many HSIs have chosen not to address a formal change in identity, the unplanned change construct provides valuable data that might otherwise be overlooked.
AllenK. (2006). The Hispanic-serving designation: Asset or deficit?Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 23(16), 34-35.
2.
AtkinsonP.CoffeyA. (2011). Analysing documentary realities. In SilvermanD. (Ed.), Qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 77-92). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
BenitezM.DeAroJ. (2004). Realizing student success at Hispanic-serving institutions. In LadenB. V. (Ed.), New directions for community colleges (pp. 35-48). Indianapolis, IN: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BouchikhiH.FiolC. M.GioiaD. A.Golden-BiddleK.HatchM. J.RaoH.. . . SchultzM. (1998). The identity of organizations. In WhettenD. A.GodfreyP. C. (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 33-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
BridgesB. K.KinzieJ.LairdT. F. N.KuhG. (2008). Student engagement and student success at historically Black and Hispanic-serving institutions. In GasmanM.BaezB.TurnerC. S. V. (Eds.), Understanding minority-serving institutions (pp. 217-236). Albany: State University of New York Press.
6.
CohenA. M.BrawerF. B. (2008). The American community college (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
ContrerasF. E.MalcomL. E.BensimonE. M. (2008). Hispanic-serving institutions: Closeted identity and the production of equitable outcomes for Latina/o students. In GasmanM.BaezB.TurnerC. S. V. (Eds.), Understanding minority-serving institutions (pp. 71-90). Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 173-208. doi:10.2307/4131471
9.
CorleyK. G.HarquailC. V.PrattM. G.GlynnM. A.FiolC. M.HatchM. J. (2006). Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 85-99.
10.
CrispG.TaggartA.NoraA. (2014). Undergraduate Latina/o students: A systematic review of research identifying factors contributing to academic success outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 20, 1-26. doi: 10.3102/0034654314551064
11.
CuellarM. (2014). The impact of Hispanic-serving institutions (HSIs), emerging HSIs, and non-HSIs on latina/o academic self-concept. Review of Higher Education, 37, 499-530. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2014.0032
12.
DeckerA. (2013). Student-centered practice in the 21st century community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 37, 561-565.
13.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517-554. doi:10.2307/256405
14.
ElsbachK. D.KramerR. M. (1996). Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 442-476. doi:10.2307/2393938
15.
GilbertC.HellerD. (2010, November). The Truman Commission and Its Impact on Federal Higher Education Policy from 1947-2010. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Indianapolis, IN.
16.
GioiaD. A.PatvardhanS. D.HamiltonA. L.CorleyK. G. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 123-193. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.762225
17.
GioiaD. A.SchultzM.CorleyK. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 63-81. doi:10.2307/259263
18.
GioiaD. A.ThomasJ. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370-403. doi: 10.2307/2393936
19.
HarrisF.IIIBensimonE. M. (2007). The equity scorecard: A collaborative approach to assess and respond to racial/ethnic disparities in student outcomes. New Directions for Student Services, 120, 77-84. doi: 10.1002/ss.259
20.
HurtadoS.AlvarezC.Guillermo-WannC.CuellarM.ArellanoL. (2012). A model for diverse learning environments. In SmartJ. C.PaulsenM. B. (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 27, pp. 41-122): Springer Netherlands.
21.
HurtadoS.PonjuanL. (2005). Latino educational outcomes and the campus climate. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4, 235-251.
22.
KezarA. (2013). Understanding sensemaking/sensegiving in transformational change processes from the bottom up. Higher Education, 65, 761-780.
23.
KurlaenderM. (2006). Choosing community college: Factors affecting Latino college choice. New Directions for Community Colleges, 7-16. doi:10.1002/cc.223
24.
LadenB. V. (2004). Hispanic-serving institutions: What are they? Where are they?College Journal of Research and Practice, 28, 181-198. doi:10.1080/10668920490256381
25.
MalcomL. E.BensimonE. M.DavilaB. (2010). (Re)constructing Hispanic-serving institutions: Moving beyond numbers toward student success (Educational Policy and Practical Perspectives, No. 6, Winter). Ames: Department of Educational Leadership Studies, Iowa State University.
26.
MullinC. M. (2012). Why access matters: The community college student body. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Community Colleges.Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532204.pdf
27.
NagR.CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2007). The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 821-847. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279173
28.
NunezA.-M.HooverR. E.PicketK.Stuart-CarruthersA. C.VasquezM. (Eds). (2013). Latinos in higher education and Hispanic-serving institutions: Creating conditions for success (Vol. 39): Wiley and Sons, Inc.
29.
PrattM. G.CorleyK. G. (2007). Managing multiple organizational identities: On identity ambiguity, identity conflict, and members’ reactions. In BartelC. A.BladerS.WrzesniewskiA. (Eds.), Identity and the modern organization (pp. 99-118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
PrattM. G.ForemanP. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25, 18-42. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.2791601
31.
QuigleyM.BaileyT. W. (2003). Community college movement in perspective: Teachers college responds to the Truman Commission. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
