To support the long-term success of underprepared students, many community colleges are experimenting with accelerated developmental education models, which allow students to complete remediation and enroll in college-level math and English within a shorter time frame. This study examines three developmental acceleration programs, including two in English and one in math. Overall, students on accelerated pathways were more likely than a set of matched peers to successfully complete the relevant college-level course within 3 years. However, to help maintain strong student performance within subsequent college-level courses, accelerated pathways may need to incorporate rigorous content, systematic faculty development, and targeted student supports.
An Act Concerning College Readiness and Completion, S. 40 (Conn. Stat. 2012).
2.
An Act Relating to Education, S. 1720 (Fla. Stat. 2013).
3.
AdamsP.GearhartS.MillerR.RobertsA. (2009). The accelerated learning program: Throwing open the gates. Journal of Basic Writing, 29(2), 50-69.
4.
BaileyT.JeongD. W.ChoS.-W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29, 255-270. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.002
5.
BarraganM.CormierM. (2013). Enhancing rigor in developmental education (Inside Out No. 4). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
6.
BelfieldC.CrostaP. (2012). Predicting success in college: The importance of placement tests and high school transcripts (CCRC Working Paper No. 42). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
7.
BraggD. D.BakerE. D.PuryearM. (2010). 2010 follow-up of the Community College of Denver FastStart program. Champaign: Office of Community College Research and Leadership, University of Illinois.
8.
BurrisC. C.WileyE.WelnerK. G.MurphyJ. (2008). Accountability, rigor, and detracking: Achievement effects of embracing a challenging curriculum as a universal good for all students. Teachers College Record, 110, 571-608.
9.
Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2012). A matter of degrees: Promising practices for community college student success (A first look). Austin: Community College Leadership Program, The University of Texas at Austin.
10.
Complete College America. (2011). Time is the enemy of graduation: The surprising truth about why today’s college students aren’t graduating . . . and what needs to change. Retrieved from http://www.completecollege.org/docs/Time_Is_the_Enemy.pdf
CoxR. D. (2009). The college fear factor: How students and professors misunderstand each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
DehejiaR. H.WahbaS. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 151-161. doi:10.2307/3211745
14.
EdgecombeN. (2011). Accelerating the academic achievement of students referred to developmental education (CCRC Working Paper No. 30, Assessment of Evidence Series). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
15.
EdgecombeN.CormierM. S.BickerstaffS.BarraganM. (2013). Strengthening developmental education reforms: Evidence on implementation efforts from the Scaling Innovation project (CCRC Working Paper No. 61). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
16.
EdgecombeN.JaggarsS. S.BakerE. D.BaileyT. (2013). Acceleration through a holistic support model: An implementation and outcomes analysis of FastStart@CCD. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
17.
FayM. P.BickerstaffS.HodaraM. (2013). Why students do not prepare for math placement exams: Student perspectives (CCRC Brief No. 57). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
18.
FieldsR.ParsadB. (2012). Tests and cut scores used for student placement in postsecondary education: Fall 2011. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.
19.
GoudasA. M.BoylanH. R. (2012). Addressing flawed research in developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education, 36(1), 2-13.
20.
GrubbW. N. (with GabrinerR.). (2013). Basic skills education in community colleges: Inside and outside of classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
HernK. (with SnellM.). (2010). Exponential attrition and the promise of acceleration in developmental English and math. Berkeley: The Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges.
22.
HernK. (2011). Accelerated English at Chabot College: A synthesis of key findings. Hayward: The California Acceleration Project.
23.
HernK. (2012). Acceleration across California: Shorter pathways in developmental English and math. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(3), 60-68. doi:10.1080/00091383.2012.672917
24.
HillJ. (2008). Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: Comments on “A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003” by Peter Austin. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2055-2061. doi:10.1002/sim.3245
25.
HodaraM.JaggarsS. S. (2014). An examination of the impact of accelerating community college students’ progression through developmental education. Journal of Higher Education, 85, 246-276. doi:10.1353/jhe.2014.0006
26.
HodaraM.JaggarsS. S.KarpM. M. (2012). Improving developmental education assessment and placement: Lessons from community colleges across the country (CCRC Working Paper No. 51). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
27.
HornL.NevillS. (2006). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 2003–04: With a special analysis of community college students (NCES 2006-184). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
28.
JenkinsD.SperoniC.BelfieldC.JaggarsS. S.EdgecombeN. (2010). A model for accelerating academic success of community college remedial English students: Is the Accelerated Learning Program (ALP) effective and affordable? (CCRC Working Paper No. 21). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
29.
JohnsonJ.RochkindJ. (with OttA. N.DuPontD). (2009). With their whole lives ahead of them: Myths and realities about why so many students fail to finish college. San Francisco, CA: Public Agenda.
30.
QuintJ. C.JaggarsS. S.ByndlossD. C.MagazinnikA. (2013). Bringing developmental education to scale: Lessons from the Developmental Education Initiative. New York, NY: MDRC.
31.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39, 33-38. doi:10.2307/2683903
32.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2012). Do high-stakes placement exams predict college success? (CCRC Working Paper No. 41). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
33.
Scott-ClaytonJ.RodriguezO. (2012). Development, discouragement, or diversion? New evidence on the effects of college remediation (NBER Working Paper No. 18328). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
34.
StataCorp. (2013). Stata 13 base reference manual. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
35.
VeneziaA.BraccoK. R.NodineT. (2010). One shot deal? Students’ perceptions of assessment and placement in California’s community colleges. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
