As one of the few qualitative studies on this topic, this phenomenological study examined how parolees experience participation in a community college reentry program. One-on-one interviews were conducted with 11 parolee college students. Major themes found that parolees enjoy the college environment and that they have become role models for their families as a result of their college experiences. Most participants also believe that taking community college classes has improved their parole experiences and will decrease their chances of returning to prison. This research reveals a potential role for more community colleges to serve such parolee populations as part of their public good mission.
BashamM. J.CampbellD. F.MendozaP. (2008). Critical issues facing America’s community college: A summary of the community college futures assembly 2008. Community College Journal, 32, 857-870.
2.
BethelP. H. (1986). The perceptions of inmates and educational directors of the correctional education programs in Pennsylvania (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, PA.
3.
BhattiG. (2010). Learning behind bars: Education in prisons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 31-36.
4.
CopenhaverA.Edwards-WilleyT.ByersB. (2007). Journeys in social stigma: The lives of formerly incarcerated felons in higher education. Journal of Correctional Education: Official Publication of the Correctional Education Association, 58, 268-283.
5.
CraytonA.MukamalD. A.TravisJ. (2009). A new era in inmate reentry. Corrections Today, 71(6), 38-41.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
ElonheimoH.NiemelËaS.ParkkolaK.MultimËakiP.HeleniusH.NuutilaA. M.SouranderA. (2007). Police-registered offenses and psychiatric disorders among young males. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42, 477-484.
8.
GlazeL. E. (2011). Correctional populations in the United States, 2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
9.
HallM. B. (2003). Making it: Inside perceptions on success, relapse, and recidivism by In Prison Therapeutic Treatment Community (IPTC) program parolees in Harris County, Texas (Doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, Harris.
10.
HanrahanK.GibbsJ.ZimmermanS. (2005). Parole and revocation: Perspectives of young adult offenders. The Prison Journal, 85, 251-269.
11.
HeiserS. (2007). Student perceptions of a college distance learning program at a maximum security prison (Master’s thesis). Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA.
12.
HollD. B.KolovichL. (2008). Evaluation of the prisoner re-entry initiative: Interim report. Washington, DC: Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
13.
IrelandC. (2007). Parolee day treatment: Action research with parolees in an urban setting. Justice Policy Journal, 4(2), 2-35.
14.
LynchJ. P. (2006). Prisoner reentry: Beyond program evaluation. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(2), 12.
15.
LynchJ. P.SabolW. J. (2001). Prisoner reentry in perspective. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
RichardsS. (1992). Structural impediments of parole success: An extended case study of prison release, work release, and parole (Doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
18.
RichardsS.AustinJ.JonesR. (2004). Kentucky’s perpetual prisoner machine: It’s about money. Review of Policy Research, 21, 93-106.
19.
RossJ. (2009). Education from the inside out: The multiple benefits of college programs in prison. New York: Correctional Association of New York.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs. (2007). Learn about reentry: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
23.
U.S. Department of Labor: Employment and Training Administration. (2006). Prisoner re-entry initiative: Justice Department announces grants to 20 States–What’s new in workforce investment?Washington, DC: Author.
24.
Van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario, Canada: University of Western Ontario.
25.
VisherC.BaerD.NaserR. (2006). Ohio prisoners’ reflections on returning home (Vol. 2007). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
26.
VisherC.FarrellJ. (2005). Chicago communities and prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
