Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The four articles in this special issue focus on developmental education students and the research needed for an enhanced understanding of the instructional and institutional approaches that promote their success. This introduction summarizes the purpose and key findings of each article, noting implications for future research and practice.

Keywords

developmental education student outcomes instructional practices research methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bahr

P. R.

(2013). The deconstructive approach to understanding college students’ pathways and outcomes. Community College Review, 41(2), 137-153.

Bailey

T. R.

Jeong

D. W.

Cho

S. W.

(2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29, 255-270. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.002

Boylan

H. R.

(2002). What works: A guide to research-based best practices in developmental education. Boone, NC: Continuous Quality Improvement Network and the National Center for Developmental Education, Appalachian State University.

Bremer

C. D.

Center

B. A.

Opsal

C. L.

Medhanie

Jang

Y. J.

Geise

A. C.

(2013). Outcome trajectories of developmental students in community colleges. Community College Review, 41(2), 154-175.

Bruning

Dempsey

Kauffman

D. F.

McKim

Zumbrunn

(2012). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0029692.

Carnevale

A. P.

Cheah

Strohl

(2012). Hard times, college majors, unemployment and earnings: Not all college degrees are created equal. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Retrieved from http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/Unemployment.Final.update1.pdf.

Cohen

A. M.

Brawer

F. B.

(2008). The American community college (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Holzer

(2010, April). Reviving the labor market with middle-skill jobs.Policy Memo. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.progressivepolicy.org/2010/04/reviving-the-labor-market-with-middle-skill-jobs/

Karp

M. M.

Bork

R. H.

(2012). “They never told me what to expect, so I didn’t know what to do”: Defining and clarifying the role of a community college student (CCRC Working Paper, No. 47). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.

10.

Kutner

Greenberg

Jin

Boyle

Hsu

Dunleavy

(2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2007-480). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retreived from http://nces.ed.gov/Pubs2007/2007480_1.pdf

11.

Lesgold

A. M.

Welch-Ross

(Eds.). (2012). Improving adult literacy: Options for practice and research. Washington, DC: Committee on Learning Sciences: Foundations and Applications to Adolescent and Adult Literacy. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13242

12.

MacArthur

C. A.

Philippakos

Z. A.

(2013). Self-regulated strategy instruction in developmental writing: A design research project. Community College Review, 41(2) 176–195.

13.

MacArthur

C. A.

Philippakos

Z. A.

Graham

(2012, July). Writing motivation and achievement among struggling college writers. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Special Interest Group on Writing, European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Porto, Portugal.

14.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The Nation’s Report Card: Grade 12 Reading and Mathematics 2009 National and Pilot State Results (NCES 2011-455). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2009/2011455.pdf

15.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2012).The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012-470). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2012470.pdf

16.

Perin

(2006). Can community colleges protect both access and standards? The problem of remediation. Teachers College Record, 108, 339-373.]

17.

Perin

(2013). Literacy skills among academically underprepared students. Community College Review, 41(2), 118-136.

18.

Phillippe

K. A.

Sullivan

L. G.

(2005). National profile of community colleges: Trends and statistics (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Community College Press.

19.

Scott-Clayton

Rodriguez

(2012). Development, discouragement, or diversion?New evidence on the effects of college remediation (NBER Working Paper No. 18328). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18328

20.

Staklis

(2010). Profile of undergraduate students: 2007-08 (NCES 2010-205). Washington, DC: National Center forEducation Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2010205

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB