Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A needs assessment determined Oregon community college staff knowledge of (a) accessible information technology (IT) guidelines, (b) IT-related disability laws, (c) legal obligations regarding Web accessibility, and (d) perceived level of current Web accessibility. Training needs were assessed and training suggestions were solicited. IT staff demonstrated higher levels of Web accessibility guidelines knowledge, and disability/student services staff best understood disability laws. At most schools, knowledge of disability issues and IT were not integrated. Needs identified included provision of: comprehensive resources about accessible Web design, hands-on trainings in accessible technology topics, strategies for fulfilling legal accessibility obligations, training for students and staff regarding their responsibilities in the area of accessible IT, and a Web site accessibility testing service.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.160-35.164 and 28 C.F.R. §§ 36.301-36.310. (1990).

ADA handbook. (1992). Washington, DC: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Office of Communication and Legislative Affairs.

Cardenas, A. (1997). Letter to Dr. James Rosser, President of California State University, Los Angeles, from the Office for Civil Rights. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from http://www.rit.edu/easi/law/csula.htm

Chisholm, W. , Vanderheiden, G. , & Jacobs, I. (Eds.). (1999). Web content accessibility guidelines 1. 0. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990505

Cooper, M. (2001). Automated evaluation of accessibility guidelines. Proceedings of International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, USA, 3, 150-154.

Flowers, C. , Bray, M. , & Algozzine, R. F. (2001). Content accessibility of community college Web sites. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25, 475-485.

Meachen, E. (2000). Letter to vice chancellors and chief information officers of the University of Wisconsin System. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from http://www.uwsa.edu/olit/access/edmemo.htm

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (504). (1973).

Schmetzke, A. (2001). Accessibility of the home pages of the nation's community colleges. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from http://library.uwsp.edu/aschmetz/Accessible/nationwide/CC_Survey200l/summary_CCC.htm

10.

Schmetzke, A. (2004). Web page accessibility on University of Wisconsin campuses: 2004 survey and six-year trend data. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from http://library.uwsp.edu/aschmetz/Accessible/UW-Campuses/Survey2004/contents2004.htm

11.

Shelton, P. (1996). Letter to Dr. Robert Caret, President of San Jose State University from the Office for Civil Rights. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from http://www.rit.edu/-easi/law/sjsu.htm

12.

Thompson, T. , Burgstahler, S. , & Comden, D. (2003). Research on Web accessibility in higher education. Information technology and disabilities, 9. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from http://www.rit.edu/-easi/itd/itdvO9n2/thompson.htm

13.

U.S. Access Board (2000). Board issues standards for electronic and information technology. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from http://www.access-board.gov/news/508-final.htm

14.

U.S. Department of Justice (1993). The Americans With Disabilities Act Title II technical assistance manual. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/taman2.html

15.

U.S. Department of Justice (2004). ADA investigative agencies. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/investag.htm

An Assessment of Web Accessibility Knowledge and Needs at Oregon Community Colleges

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References