This review discusses the impact of fiscal contraction on community colleges. It explores how reduced state appropriations have adversely affected community college instruction and student support systems. It closes with the example of how fee increases in the 1990s lowered access to the California community college system and reduced transfers to the universities. The research shows that because instruction and student support services suffer when the budget is reduced, fiscal contraction can hamper the ability of community colleges to provide universal access.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnone, M. (2003, August 15). Students face another year of big tuition increases in many states. [Electronic Version]. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A24-A24.
2.
Brann, H. I. (1995). Analysis of the enrollment loss amongfirst-time-in-college students attending Miami-Dade Community College (Research Report No. 95-07R). Miami-Dade, FL: Miami-Dade Community College, Office of Institutional Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED390509).
3.
Burstein, M. (1996). The thin green line: Community colleges' struggle to do more with less. ERIC digest. Los Angeles, CA: ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED400024).
4.
California Postsecondary Education Commission. (1994). Student profiles, 1994: The latest in a series of annual factbooks about student participation in California higher education. (CPEC Report No. 94-20). Sacramento, CA: Author.
5.
California Postsecondary Education Commission. (1997). Student profiles, 1997: The latest in a series of annual factbooks about student participation in California higher education. (CPEC Report No. 97-7). Sacramento, CA: Author.
6.
California Postsecondary Education Commission. (2000). Student profiles, 2000: The latest in a series of annual factbooks about student participation in California higher education. (CPEC Report No. 00-8). Sacramento, CA: Author.
7.
Choy, S., & Berker, A. (2003). How families of low and middle income undergraduates pay for college: Full-time dependent students in 1999-2000. (NCES Report No. 2003-162). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
8.
Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (2003). The American community college (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
9.
Coons, A., Browne, A., Campion, H., Dumke, G., Holy, T., McHenry, D., et al. (1960). A master plan for higher education in California, 1960-1975. Sacramento: California State Department of Education.
10.
Cuccaro-Alamin, S., & Choy, S. P. (1998). Postsecondaryfinancing strategies: How undergraduates combine work, borrowing, and attendance. Statistical analysis report. Postsecondary education descriptive analysis reports (NCES Report No. 98088). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED418097).
11.
de la Garza, L. (2000, September). The financing of United States community colleges: National, state, and local perspectives. Paper presented at the seminar on New Options for Higher Education in Latin America: Lessons from the Community College Experience, Cambridge, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED457895).
12.
Education Commission of the States, Center for Community College Policy. (2000). State funding for community colleges: A 50 state survey. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED449863).
13.
Fogg, P. (2003, May 2). Nebraska puts museum professors on endangered species list: Tenure provided little protection from budget cuts. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A18-A20.
14.
Goel, M. (2002, June). Educational objectives and retention at two community colleges. Paper presented at the Annual Forum for the Association for Institutional Research, Toronto, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED468770).
15.
Grubb, N. (2001). "Getting into the world": Guidance and counseling in community colleges. New York: Columbia University, Community College Research Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED455880).
16.
Hagedorn, L., Perrakis, A., & Maxwell, B. (2002). The positive commandments: Ten ways the community colleges help students succeed. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Rossier School of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED466263).
17.
Halstead, D. (1996). Higher education report card 1995. Washington, DC: Research Associates.
18.
Hebel, S., Schmidt, P., & Selingo, J. (2002, January 11). States face year of famine after decade of plenty. 36 legislatures must deal with deficits, and higher education may be a lower priority [Electronic version]. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A20-A20.
19.
Hebel, S. (2003, May 30). Unequal impact: Community colleges face disproportionate cuts in state budgets. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A21-A22.
20.
Heller, D. E. (1996). Tuition, financial aid, and access to public higher education: A review of the literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED406906).
21.
Heller, D. E. (1998, November). A comparison of tuition price and financial aid responsiveness offirst-time enrollees and continuing college students. Paper presented at the Annual Conference for the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED427563).
22.
Hoachlander, G., Sikora, A. C., & Horn, L. (2003). Community college students: Goals, academic preparation, and outcomes. (NCES Report No. 2003-164). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
23.
Hugget, K. (1994). How colleges are coping. Pleasanton, CA: Chabot-Las Positas Community College District. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED377924).
24.
Kane, T. (1995). Rising public college tuition and college entry: How well do public subsidies promote access to college?Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic ResearchWorking Paper Series No. 5164.
25.
Larose, M. (2003, August 19). Budget cuts forcing tuition hikes across the country. Community College Times. Retrieved August 27, 2003, from http://www.aacc.nche.edu
26.
Laurente, Z., & Sheldon, D. (2000). Report on local investment of Partnership funds: Expenditures for 1998-1999 and 1999-2000. Sacramento: California Community Colleges, Office of the Chancellor. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED450838).
27.
Maxwell, L., & Mecoy, L. (2003, July 17). UC, CSU ratify big fee hikes: Students will be paying about 40% more than they did last fall. Sacramento Bee. Retrieved July 18, 2003 from http://www.sacbee.com
28.
McCurdy, Jack. (1994). Broken promises: The impact of budget cuts and fee increases on the California community colleges. San Jose: California Higher Education Policy Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED376869).
29.
Mills, K. (2003, Summer). California cuts to the bone: Community colleges are hit hard as a result of state's record budget deficit. National Crosstalk,11(3), 8-10. Retrieved July 29, 2003, from http://www.highereducation.org/crosstalk/ctO303/newsO303-california.shtml
30.
Philippe, K. (1998). The cost of education. Community colleges a good value. AACC research brief (Report No. AACC-RB-98-2). Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED422045).
31.
Rancho Santiago Community College District, Research Department. (2003). Santa Ana College freshman experience program: Summary of outcomes and student satisfaction. Santa Ana, CA: Author.
32.
Research and Analysis Unit, Policy Analysis and Development Division. (1993). 1993 report on fee impact. Sacramento: California Community Colleges, Office of the Chancellor.
33.
Rooney, M. (2002, November 1). A surge of students: Enrollments soar at colleges of all types. For some of them that's a mixed blessing. [Electronic Version]. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A33-A33.
34.
San Diego Community College District, Research and Planning Office (1993). Increasing enrollment fees. Equity? Or the allocation of opportunity?San Diego, CA: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED362223).
35.
Sheldon, D. & Yong, C. (2001). Report on local investments of Partnership funds: Investments for 2000-2001. Sacramento: California Community Colleges, Office of the Chancellor. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED465385).
36.
Snyder, T. (2003). Digest of education statistics 2002. (NCES Report No. 2003-060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
37.
Texas State Legislature, House Committee on Higher Education. (1992). A report of the committee on higher education to the house of representatives 73rd legislature. Austin, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED357716).
38.
Tinto, V. & Love, A. (1995). A longitudinal study of learning communities at La Guardia Community College. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED380178).
