Twenty-two faculty at a Midwestern community college were interviewed to elicit their perceptions of their career paths, their early-stage career roles, and the role played by faculty development in their early careers. Based on the interview data, the majority did not foresee their career path and chose the community college because of its emphasis on teaching. Participants indicated that their career roles changed over time from an emphasis totally on teaching to one that included supplemental activities and that research was encouraged in their work. Many perceived faculty development activities as having a significant impact on their careers. The authors make recommendations for faculty recruitment, retention, and development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alfred, R. L., & Linder, V. (1992). Empowering faculty through redefined work roles. In K. Kroll (Ed.), Maintaining faculty excellence (pp. 49-60). New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 79. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Baldwin, R. G. (1990). Faculty career stages and implications for professional development. In J. H. Schuster, D. W. Wheeler, & Associates (Eds.), Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal. (pp. 20-40). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
3.
Barnsley, J. R. (1992). An historical review of efforts to define the effective community college teacher: A chronological analysis of the literature from 1920 to 1989 (Effective teaching literature). Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas.
4.
Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). An assessment of faculty performance: Some correlates between administrator, colleague, student, and self ratings. Sociology of Education, 48(2), 242-256.
5.
Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member: Supporting and fostering professional development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Bowen, H. R., & Schuster, J. H. (1986). American professors: A national resource imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
California Educational Policies Committee. (1991). Hiring effective faculty: An introduction. Unpublished manuscript prepared for California Community Colleges. Sacramento: Author.
8.
Carter, D. J., & Ottinger, C. A. (1992). Community college faculty: A profile. Research Briefs, 3(7).
9.
Cohen, A. M. (1972). Confronting identity: The community college instructor. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.
Cohen, A. M. (1973). Work satisfaction among junior college faculty members. Los Angeles: ERIC Clearinghouse for Junior Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 081 426)
11.
Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (1972). The who, what, why of instructor evaluation. Topical Paper No. 33. Los Angeles: ERIC Clearinghouse for Junior Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 060 839)
12.
Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (1996). The American community college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
DeBard, R. (1995). Preferred education and experience of community college English faculty: Twenty years later. Community College Review, 23(1), 33-50.
14.
Doughtery, K. J. (1994). The contradictory college: The conflicting origins, impacts, and futures of the community college. Albany: SUNY Press.
15.
Frankel, J. (1973). Junior college faculty job satisfaction. Los Angeles: ERIC Clearinghouse for Junior Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 081 425)
16.
Furniss, W. T. (1981). Reshaping faculty careers. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
17.
Gleazer, E. J. Jr. (1968). This is the community college. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
18.
Hawthorne, E. M. (1994). The preparation, screening, and selection of community college faculty members. In G. A. Baker III (Ed.), A handbook on the community college in America: Its history, mission, and management (pp. 399-409). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
19.
Johnson, B. L. (1958). Problems of preparing junior college teachers. Report of the state-wide conference on the preparation of junior college teachers. Sacramento: State Department of Education.
20.
Keim, M. C. (1989). Two-year college faculty: A research update. Community College Review, 17(3), 34-43.
21.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
22.
McGrath, D., & Spear, M. B. (1988). A professoriate is in trouble and hardly anyone recognizes it. Change, 20(1), 26-26, 53-53.
23.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
24.
O'Banion, T. (1972). Teachers for tomorrow: Staff development in the communityjunior college. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
25.
Palmer, J. C. (1994). Faculty practices and attitudes as teachers and scholars: A review of research. In G. A. Baker III (Ed.), A handbook on the community college in America: Its history, mission, and management (pp. 423-435). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
26.
Palmer, J. (1992). Faculty professionalism reconsidered. In K. Kroll (Ed.), Maintaining faculty excellence (pp. 29-38). New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 79. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zappia, C. A. (1995, November). History in the 1990s: The status of the profession in the community colleges. Paper presented at the National Conference of the Community College Humanities Association. Washington, DC.
