Educating the public about the potential harms and benefits that may result from alcohol consumption is a valuable tool in the prevention of harm. Recommendations are often couched in definitions of what constitutes “safe” drinking and what falls under “risky” drinking. While meaningful and practical concepts and balanced definitions are surely needed, the usefulness of summarizing research on the relationship between drinking and potential risk into one-size-fits-all packages is questionable. This paper examines one such concept, that of “hazardous” drinking, and attempts to address the way in which this concept is derived and used both in the scientific literature and in recommendations for the public. The paper addresses the implications of providing such definitions for the purposes of policy and proposes ways in which recommendations on hazardous drinking can be made more meaningful to the public.
AbelE.L.Fetal Alcohol Abuse Syndrome. New York: Plenum Press, 1998.
2.
AllenJ.P.LittenR.Z.FertigJ.B. and BaborT.A review of research on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research21(4): 613–619, 1997.
3.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Primary Care Version, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Organization, 1995.
4.
American Cancer Society. Guidelines on Diet, Nutrition, and Cancer Prevention: Reducing the Risk of Cancer with Health Food Choices and Physical Activity. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 1996.
5.
AndersonP.The risk of alcohol. Addiction88(11): 1493–1508, 1993.
6.
ArriaA.M. and GossopM.Health issues and drinking patterns. In Drinking Patterns and Their Consequences. GrantM. and LitvakJ., eds. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1998.
7.
AustokerJ.Reducing alcohol intake: Cancer prevention in primary care. Part 3. British Medical Journal308(6943): 1549, 1994.
8.
BeirutL.J.Familial transmission of substance dependence: Alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, and habitual smoking: A report from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. Archives of General Psychiatry55(11): 982–988, 1998.
9.
BennettL.A.JancaA.GrantB.F. and SartoriusN.Boundaries between normal and pathological drinking. Alcohol Health and Research World17(3): 190–195, 1993.
10.
BohnM.J.BaborT.F. and KranzlerH.R.The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): Validation of a screening instrument for use in medical settings. Journal of Studies on Alcohol56(4): 423–432, 1995.
11.
BuchsbaumD.Effectiveness of treatment in general medicine patients with drinking problems. Alcohol Health and Research World18(2): 140–145, 1994.
12.
CampilloC.RomeroM.SaldivarG. and RamosL.Problems associated with hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in Mexico. In Recent Developments in Alcoholism: Volume 14. The Consequences of Alcoholism. GalanterM., ed. New York: Plenum Press, 1998.
13.
CharlesP.LaitinenK. and KardinaalA.Alcohol and bone. In Health Issues Related to Alcohol Consumption2nd edition. MacdonaldI., ed. Washington, DC: Blackwell Science, 1999.
14.
CherpitelC.J.Substance use, injury, and risk-taking dispositions in the general population. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research23(1): 121–126, 1999.
15.
ConigraveK.M.SaundersJ.B. and WhitfieldJ.B.Diagnostic tests for alcohol consumption. Alcohol and Alcoholism30(1): 13–26, 1995.
16.
CougizouP.BegleiterH. and KiianmaaK. Alcohol and genetics. In Health Issues Related to Alcohol Consumption2nd edition. MacdonaldI., ed. Washington, DC: Blackwell Science, 1999.
17.
DawsonD.A.Temporal drinking patterns and variation in social consequences. Addiction91(1): 1623–1635, 1996.
18.
DouglasM. and WildavskyA.Risk and Culture. An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982.
19.
DouglasM.Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1985.
20.
DouglasM.Risk and Blame. Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge, 1992.
21.
EdenbergH.J.Genetics of alcoholism. Science282(5392): 1269, 1998.
22.
EdwardsG.Alcohol Policy and the Public Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
23.
GodsellP.A.Carbohydrate deficient transferring levels in hazardous alcohol consumption. Alcohol and Alcoholism30(1): 61–66, 1995.
24.
GombergE.S.L.Risk factors for drinking over a woman's life span. Alcohol Health and Research World18(3): 220–227, 1994.
25.
GreenfieldT.K.Evaluating competing models of alcohol-related harm. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research22(2): 52S–62S, 1998.
26.
GrossL.How Much Is Too Much? The Effects of Social Drinking. New York: Random House, 1983.
27.
HaugeR. and Irgens-JensenO.The experiencing of positive consequences of drinking in four Scandinavian countries. British Journal of Addiction85(5): 645–653, 1990.
28.
HowseK. and GhodseA.H.Hazardous drinking and its correlates among medical students. Addiction Research4(4): 355–366, 1997.
29.
HuffmanG.B.Screening for heavy alcohol use in elderly patients. American Family Physician55(5): 1895, 1997.
30.
International Center for Alcohol Policies (ICAP). ICAP Reports 4: Drinking Age Limits. Washington, DC: ICAP, 1998.
31.
JacobsonJ.L.Teratogenic effects of alcohol on infant development. Alcoholism: Clinical Experimental Research17(1): 174–183, 1993.
32.
JohnsonP.B. and GlassmanM.Relationship between ethnicity, gender and alcohol consumption: A strategy for testing competing models. Addiction93(4): 583–588. 1998.
33.
JohnsonP.B. and GlassmanM.Moderating effects of gender and ethnicity on the relationship between effect expectancies and alcohol problems. Journal of Studies on Alcohol60(1): 64–69, 1999.
34.
JohnsonR.D. and WilliamsR.Prevention of hazardous drinking: The value of laboratory tests. British Medical Journal290(6485): 1849–1850, 1985.
35.
KwoP.Y.Gender differences in alcohol metabolism: Relationship to liver volume and effect of adjusting for body mass. Gastroenterology115(6): 1552–1557, 1998.
36.
LangE.StockwellT.RydonP. and LockwoodA.Drinking settings and problems of intoxication. Addiction Research3(2): 141–149, 1995.
37.
LiT.K.Gender and ethnic differences in alcohol metabolism. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research22(3): 771–772, 1998.
38.
LuptonD.Risk. London: Routledge, 1999.
39.
MadrigalE.Latin America. In Alcohol and Emerging Markets: Patterns, Problems and Responses. GrantM., ed. Philadelphia: Brunner Mazel, 1998.
40.
McGueM.Phenotyping alcoholism. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research23(5): 757–758, 1999.
41.
McInnesE. and PowellJ.Drug and alcohol referrals: Are elderly abuse diagnoses and referrals being missed?British Medical Journal308(6926): 444–446, 1994.
42.
MidanikL.T.Risk functions for alcohol-related problems: A 1988 US national sample. Addiction91(10): 1427–1437, 1996.
43.
PophamR.E.SchmidtW. and deLintJ.The prevention of alcoholism: Epidemiological studies of the effects of government control measures. British Journal of Addiction70(2): 125–144, 1975.
44.
RogersJ.D. and GreenfieldT.K.Beer drinking accounts for most of the hazardous alcohol consumption reported in the United States. Journal of Studies on Alcohol60(6): 732–739, 1999.
45.
RoomR.BondyS.J. and FerrisJ.The risk of harm to oneself from drinking, Canada 1989. Addiction90(4): 499–513, 1995.
46.
RussellM.New assessment tools for risk drinking during pregnancy. Alcohol Health and Research World18(1): 55–61, 1994.
47.
Sanchez-CraigM.How much is too much? Estimates of hazardous drinking based on clients' self-reports. British Journal of Addiction81(2): 251–256, 1986.
48.
SingerM.Toward a political economy of alcoholism: The missing link in the anthropology of drinking. Social Science and Medicine23(2): 113–130, 1986.
49.
SingleE. and LeinoV.E.The levels, patterns and consequences of drinking. In Drinking Patterns and Their Consequences. GrantM. and LitvakJ., eds. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, pp. 7–24, 1998.
50.
Smith-WarnerS.A.Alcohol and breast cancer in women: A pooled analysis of cohort studies. Journal of the American Medical Association279: 535–540, 1998.
51.
SokolR.J.MartierS.S. and AgerJ.W.T-ACE questions: Practical prenatal detection of risk-drinking. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology160(4): 863–870, 1989.
52.
SpencerJ.BartuA. and Harrison-StewartA.Observations on community screening for alcohol problems: A pilot project to assess the feasibility of identifying heavy drinkers in a community setting. Alcohol and Alcoholism22(1): 65–69, 1987.
53.
StockwellT.Total versus hazardous per capita alcohol consumption as predictors of acute and chronic alcohol-related harm. Contemporary Drug Problems23(3): 441–464, 1996.
54.
TyssenR.VaglumP.AaslandO.G.GrønvoldN.T. and EkbergØ.Use of alcohol to cope with tension, and its relation to gender, years in medical school and hazardous drinking: A study of two nation-wide Norwegian samples of medical students. Addiction93(9): 1341–1350, 1998.
55.
U.K. Department of Health and Social Security. Sensible Drinking: The Report of an Interdepartmental Working Group. London: HMSO, 1995.
56.
VolkR.J.SteinbauerJ.R.CantorS.B. and HolzerC.E.The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a screen for at-risk drinking in primary care patients of different racial/ethnic backgrounds. Addiction92(2): 197–206, 1997.
57.
WalshG. and RehmJ.Daily drinking and harm. Contemporary Drug Problems23(3): 465–478, 1996.
58.
WebbE.AshtonC.H.KellyP. and KamaliF.Alcohol and drug use in UK university students. Lancet348(9032): 922–925, 1996.
59.
WechslerH.Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in college. Journal of the American Medical Association272(21): 1672–1677, 1994.
60.
WechslerH.Correlates of college student binge drinking. Journal of the American Public Health Association85(7): 921–926, 1995a.
61.
WechslerH.The adverse impact of heavy episodic drinking on other college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol56(6): 628–634, 1995b.
62.
World Health Organization (WHO). Lexicon of Alcohol and Drug Terms. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1994.
63.
World Health Organization (WHO). Expert Committee on Mental Health, Report of the First Session of the Alcoholism Sub-Committee. Technical Report Number 42. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1952.
