FredaAdler, MoffettArthur D., GlaserFrederick B., BallJohn C., and HorvitzDiana. A Systems Approach to Drug Treatment. Philadelphia: Dorrance and Company, 1974.
3.
BocaDel, FrancesK. and MattsonMargaret E.. Developments in alcoholism treatment research: Patient–treatment matching. Alcohol11:471-475 (Nov./Dec.), 1994.
4.
GarfieldSidney R., CollenMorris F., FeldmanRobert, SoghikianKrikor, RichartRobert, and DuncanJames H.. Evaluation of an ambulatory medical-care delivery system. New England Journal of Medicine294:426-431 (Feb. 19), 1976.
5.
GlaserFrederick B., GreenbergStephanie W., and BarrettMorris. A Systems Approach to Alcohol Treatment. Toronto: ARF Books, 1978.
6.
GlaserFrederick B., AnnisHelen M., SkinnerHarvey A., PearlmanShelly, SegalRuth L., SissonBarry, OgborneAlan C., BohnenElizabeth, GazdaPaul, and ZimmermanTorbin. A System of Health Care Delivery. Three Volumes. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1984.
7.
GlaserFrederick B.Slouching toward a systems approach to treatment. Alcohol11:467-470 (Nov./Dec.), 1994.
8.
KathrynGraham. The Action Plan: Ontario's attempt to make systematic research-based change to the provincial treatment system. (Introduction to six papers on the Ontario experience.)Contemporary Drug Problems22:1-11 (Spring), 1995.
9.
HarrisonPatricia Ann.Chemical Dependency Treatment Accountability Plan. Minneapolis: Minnesota Department of Human Services Chemical Dependency Program Division, January1992. Reprinted May 1993 (detailed timeline and budget pages deleted).
10.
Institute of Medicine.Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990.
11.
MarshmanJoan A.Ontario's Treatment Task Force (1978): A community systems perspective on treatment. Contemporary Drug Problems22:27-41 (Spring), 1995.
12.
GarthMartin. The core-shell model: An institutional experiment. Contemporary Drug Problems22:13-26 (Spring), 1995.
13.
MattsonMargaret E. and AllenJohn P.. Research on matching alcoholic patients to treatments: findings, issues, and implications. Journal of Addictive Diseases11:33-49, 1991.
14.
MillerWilliam R. and HesterReid K.. Matching problem drinkers with optimal treatments. In: MillerWilliam R. and HeatherNick (eds.): Treating Addictive Behaviors: Processes of Change. New York: Plenum Press, 1986, pp. 175-203.
15.
StephenPierce. The recent evolution of assessment/referral centers and current directions. Contemporary Drug Problems22:105-114 (Spring), 1995.
16.
Project match Research Group.Project match: Rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treatment. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research17:1130-1145 (Nov./Dec.), 1993.
17.
ReidT. R. The Chip: How Two Americans Invented the Microchip and Launched a Revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984.
18.
BrianRushEllis, KathyAllen, Barbara, and GrahamKathryn. Ontario treatment system research 1979-1993: What have we learned about assessment and referral services in terms of the original expectations?Contemporary Drug Problems22:115-136 (Spring), 1995.
19.
SkinnerHarvey A.An overview of the core-shell treatment system. In: GlaserFrederick B., AnnisHelen M., SkinnerHarvey A., PearlmanShelly, SegalRuth L., SissonBarry, OgborneAlan C., BohnenElizabeth, GazdaPaul, and ZimmermanTorbin. A System of Health Care Delivery. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1984, Volume 1, pp. 17-26.