AnnisH.M.& DavisC. S. (1989). Relapse prevention. In HesterR. K.MillerW.R. (eds.), Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches (pp. 170-182). New York: Pergamon Press.
3.
BeckmanL. J.BardsleyP. E. (1986). Individual characteristics, gender differences and drop-out from alcoholism treatment. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 21, 213-224.
4.
BokosP.J.MejtaC. L.MonksR. L. & MickenbergJ. (1993). A case management model for intravenous drug users. In TimsJ. A. & FletcherB. W. (eds.), Innovative Approaches in the Treatment of Drug Abuse: Program Models and Strategies (pp. 87, 96). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
5.
BournazianR. (1983). Attrition Factors in Alcoholism Treatment (After Initial Contact). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6.
BowersT. G. & Al-RedhaM. R. (1990). A comparison of outcome with group/marital and standard/individual therapies with alcoholics. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 51, 301-309.
7.
BrookeD.FudalaP.J. & JohnsonR. E. (1992). Weighing up the pros and cons: Help-seeking by drug misusers in Baltimore, USA. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 31, 37-43.
8.
DiClementeC. C. (1991). Motivational interviewing and the stages of change. In MillerW. R. & RollnickS., Motivational Interviewing (pp. 191-202). New York: Guilford Press.
9.
DonovanD. M. (1988). Assessment of addictive behaviors: Implications of an emerging biopsychosocial model. In DonovanD. M. & MarlattG. A. (eds.), Assessment of Addictive Behaviors (pp. 3-50). New York: The Guilford Press.
10.
FinneyJ. W. & MoosR. H. (1986). Matching patients with treatments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47, 122-134.
11.
GlaserF. B. (1980). Anybody got a match? Treatment research and the matching hypothesis. In EdwardsG. & GrantM. (eds.), Alcoholism Treatment in Transition. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
12.
GrahamK.Birchmore-TimneyC.BoisC.& WedgerfieldK. (1993). Continuity of care in addictions treatment: The role of advocacy and coordination in case management. Unpublished manuscript. Addiction Research Foundation.
13.
GrahamK.& Birchmore-TimneyC. (1989). The problem of replicability in program evaluation: The component solution using the example of case management. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 179-187.
14.
Institute of Medicine (1990). Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
LongabaughR. (1989). Recommended research priorities for the assessment of treatment outcomes. Psychology of Addictive Behavior, 2, 131-141.
16.
MarlattG. A. (1988). Matching clients to treatment: Treatment models and stages of change. In DonovanD. M. & MarlattG. A. (eds.), Assessment of Addictive Behaviors (pp. 474-483). New York: Guilford Press.
17.
MarshmanJ. A. (Chair) (1978). The Treatment of Alcoholics: An Ontario Perspective. The Report of the Task Force on Treatment Services for Alcoholics. Toronto, Ontario: Addiction Research Foundation.
18.
MillerW. R. & HesterR. K. (1986). The effectiveness of alcoholism treatment: What research reveals. In MillerW. R. & HeatherN. (eds.), Treating Addictive Behaviors: Processes of Change (pp. 121-174). New York: Plenum Press.
19.
MillerW. R. & RollnickS. (1991). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
20.
MoosR. H. & FinneyJ. W. (1983). The expanding scope of alcoholism treatment evaluation. American Psychologist, Oct., 1036-1044.
21.
MorgensternJ.& McCradyB. S. (1992). Curative factors in alcohol and drug treatment: Behavioral and disease model perspectives. British Journal of Addiction, 87, 901-912.
22.
NirenbergT. D. & MaistoS. A. (1990). The relationship between assessment and alcohol treatment. International Journal of the Addictions, 25, 1275-1285.
23.
OgborneA. C. & RushB. R. (1990). Specialized addictions assessment/referral services in Ontario: A review of their characteristics and roles in the addiction treatment system. British Journal of Addiction, 85, 197-204.
24.
OppenheimerE.SheehanM.& TaylorC. (1988). Letting the client speak: Drug misusers and the process of help seeking. British Journal of Addiction, 83, 635-647.
25.
PanepintoW. C. & SimmonsL. (1986). Treating the illness, not the mandate: Techniques for successful referral, engagement, and treatment of alcoholic persons. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 3, 37-48.
26.
ProchaskaJ. O. & DiClementeC. C. (1985). Common process of change in smoking, weight control, and psychological distress. In ShiffmanS. & WillsT. (eds.), Coping and Substance Abuse (pp. 345-363). San Diego: Academic Press.
27.
ProchaskaJ. O. & DiClementeC. C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In MillerW. R. & HeatherN. (eds.), Treating Addictive Behaviors: Processes of Change (pp. 3-27). New York: Plenum Press.
28.
Sanchez-CraigM. (1990). Brief didactic treatment for alcohol and drug-related problems: An approach based on client choice. British Journal of Addiction, 85, 169-177.
29.
SingerM. (1983). Evaluating alcoholism treatment programs: Considerations and caveats. International Journal of the Addictions, 18, 1145-1155.
30.
ThomB. (1984). A process approach to women's use of alcohol services. British Journal of Addiction, 79, 377-382.
31.
WeisnerC. (1986). The social ecology of alcohol treatment in the United States. In GalanterM. (ed.), Recent Developments in Alcoholism (Vol. 5, pp. 203-243). New York: Plenum Press.