This study analyzes Puerto Rico's digital media coverage of the overdose crisis through framing and positioning analyses of 129 articles from the top three newspapers between 2015 and 2024. Four frames were identified: Overdose and Public Health (14.7%), Health Policies and State Responsibility (23.3%), Criminalization and Morality (22.5%), and Health and Opioid Interventions (39.5%). The study found four main narratives that assign blame, risks, and solutions, shaping subjectivities and moral orders: Youth Positioning of Drug Initiation as an autobiographical account of starting opioid use; Combative Subject, representing the normalization of recovery as an ongoing effort; Police Hero, legitimizing punishment and externalizing blame; and Moral Pharmacist Entrepreneur, reinforcing surveillance practices and promoting the agenda toward benzodiazepines and tighter drug prescription and distribution controls. The findings reveal a hybrid discursive landscape in which health-related logics coexist with criminalizing rhetoric, reflecting tensions in how the overdose crisis is defined, governed, and morally negotiated in Puerto Rico.
BeckerH. S. (2018). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance (50th anniversary ed.). Free Press. Original work published 1963.
3.
BeckettK.Brydolf-HorwitzM. (2020). A kinder, gentler drug war? Race, drugs, and punishment in America of the 21st century. Punishment & Society, 22(4), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520925145
EntmanR. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02328.x
EntmanR. M. (2010). Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of campaign 2008. Journalism, 11(4), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910367587
9.
EscohotadoA. (2008). Historia General de las Drogas. Espasa Calpe.
10.
GarridoJ. (2023). Discourse in the media. In López FerreroC.CarranzaI.Van DijkT. (Eds.), Discourse studies: The Routledge handbook of Spanish language discourse studies (pp. 333–351). Routledge.
11.
GilesD.ShawR. L. (2009). The psychology of news influence and the development of media framing analysis. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00180.x
GreerA.RitterA. (2019). Harm reduction and the opioid crisis: Emerging policy challenges. International Journal of Drug Policy, 71, 139–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.05.015
14.
HerzogB. (2015). The discursive construction of drug realities: Discourses on drugs, users, and drug-related practices. In GillN. P.GoughB. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of adult mental health (pp. 101–116). Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
JonesR. H. (2012). Positioning in the analysis of discourse and interaction. In ChapelleC. A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–7). Wiley-Blackwell.
16.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
17.
LancasterK.HughesC. E.SpicerB.Matthew-SimmonsF.DillonP. (2010). Illicit drugs and the media: Models of media effects for use in drug policy research. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30(4), 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00239.x
18.
LévesqueJ. T.RoyM. (2021). “A drug that doesn't discriminate”: Opioids in the Canadian media. Drogues, Santé et Société, 19(1–2), 7–37. https://doi.org/10.7202/1085167ar
19.
MatthesJ.KohringM. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
OrsiniM. M. (2017). Frame analysis of drug narratives in network news coverage. Contemporary Drug Problems, 44(3), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450917722817
22.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage Publications.
23.
QuanA. M. L.WilsonL. A.MithaniS. S.ZhuD. T.BotaA.B.WilsonK. (2020). Reporting on the opioid crisis (2000–2018): Role of The Globe and Mail, a Canadian English-language newspaper in influencing public opinion. Harm Reduction Journal, 17(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00443-7
24.
ReinarmanC. (1994). The social construction of drug scares. In BestJ. (Ed.), Constructions of deviance: Social power, context, and interaction (pp. 92–104). Aldine de Gruyter.
25.
ReinarmanC.DuskinC. (1999). Dominant ideology and drugs in the media. In J. Ferrell & N. Websdale (Eds.), Making trouble: Cultural constructions of crime, deviance, and control (pp. 69–84). Transaction Publishers.
26.
ReinarmanC.GranfieldR. (2015). Addiction is not just a brain disease: Critical studies of addiction. In GranfieldR.ReinarmanC. (Eds.), Expanding addiction: Critical essays (pp. 1–24). Routledge.
27.
Rodríguez-BeruffJ. (1997). Guerra contra las drogas, militarización y democracia: Políticas y fuerzas de seguridad en Puerto Rico. In García-MuñizH.Rodríguez-BeruffJ. (Eds.), Fronteras en conflicto: Guerra contra las drogas, militarización y democracia en el Caribe, Puerto Rico y Vieques (pp. 51–115). Red de Geopolítica.
28.
RoomR. (2015). The cultural framing of addiction. In GranfieldR.ReinarmanC. (Eds.), Expanding addiction: Critical essays (pp. 43–50). Routledge.
WangG.WuX.LiQ. (2021). A bibliometric study of news discourse analysis (1988–2020). Discourse & Communication, 16(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211043725
33.
WebsterF.RiceK.SudA. (2020). A critical content analysis of media reporting on opioids: The social construction of an epidemic. Social Science & Medicine, 244, 112642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112642
34.
WuX. (2023). Parallel development: Medicalization and decriminalization in the changing media framing of the opioid overdose crisis. Socius, 9, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231231186731
35.
YoungJ. (1971). The drugtakers: The social meaning of drug use. Paladin.
36.
YoungJ. (1973). Subterranean values and drug use. In CohenS. (Ed.), Images of deviance (pp. 27–61). Penguin.
