Argentina’s national drug law, Law 23.737, has been in effect since 1989. Based on prohibitionist drug policy, this law was intended to severely punish drug traffickers and protect the public from drug use-related health concerns. However, it has failed to achieve these goals, and instead targets people who use drugs (PWUD) and brands them “criminals.” In response, the Argentine government announced its intent to reform Law 23.737 in 2008, sparking widespread debate among health, legal, and social service professionals. This article discusses this debate from the perspective of harm reductionists, those who work to reduce the negative effects of drug use rather than eliminate drug use or ensure abstinence. Drawing on archival research and 16 months of ethnographic fieldwork in Argentina, this article examines the positionality of harm reductionists in this drug policy reform, particularly the controversial proposal to decriminalize drug possession for personal use. Demonstrating their contention that Argentina’s legal apparatus is a major contributor to PWUD’s discrimination, stigmatization, and isolation from health and social services, I argue that challenging these problems through policy engagement allows Argentine harm reductionists to draw attention to the broader question of PWUD’s rights and to ultimately recast PWUD as rights-bearing citizens.
ArendtH. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt, Brace and World.
2.
BarrosS.CastagnolaG. (2000). The political frontiers of the social: Argentine politics after Peronist populism (1955–1973). In HowarthD.NorvalA. J.StavrakakisY. (Eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies, and social change (pp. 24–37). Manchester University Press.
3.
BernardH. R. (2018). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.
4.
BistagninoP. (2010, November28). Claudio Morgado: “Tenemos que sacarnos las caretas y hablar con honestidad” [Claudio Morgado: “We must remove the masks and talk honestly”]. La Mañana Neuquén.
5.
BrodieJ. (1994). Shifting boundaries: Gender and the politics of restructuring. In I. Baker (Ed.), The strategic silence: Gender and economic policy (pp. 46–60). Zed Books.
6.
CappielloH. (2008, March11). Analizan despenalizar en el país el consumo de drogas [They analyze decriminalizing in the country of drug use]. La Nación.
Clarín. (2008, March24). Ya hay polémica por el fallo que preparan en la Corte sobre drogas [There is already a controversy over the ruling on drugs that they prepare in the Court]. www.clarin.com/diario/2008/03/24/sociedad/s-03001.htm
9.
CookC.KanaefN. (2008). The global state of harm reduction 2008: Mapping the response to drug-related HIV and hepatitis C epidemics. International Harm Reduction Association.
10.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
11.
CordaR. A. (2011). Encarcelamientos por delitos relacionados con estupefacientes en Argentina[Imprisonment for drug-related crimes in Argentina]. Intercambios Asociación Civil.
12.
CordaR. A. (2016). La estrategia fallida: Encarcelamientos por delitos relacionados con estupefacientes en la Argentina [Failed strategy: Imprisonment for drug-related crimes in Argentina]. Intercambios Asociación Civil.
13.
CraveroP. (2011, February25). Casación le baja línea a la Cámara Federal en casos de tenencia para consumo [Appeal goes down the line to the Federal Chamber on cases of possession for use]. El Voz del Interior.
EpeleM. (2007). La lógica de la sospecha: Sobre criminalización del uso de drogas, complots y barreras de acceso al sistema de salud [The logic of suspicion: On criminalization of drug use, conspiracies, and barriers to health system access]. Cuadernos de Antropología Social, 25, 151–168.
18.
EzardN. (2001). Public health, human rights, and the harm reduction paradigm: From risk reduction to vulnerability reduction. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(01)00093-7
19.
FaulkK. A. (2013). In the wake of neoliberalism: Citizenship and human rights in Argentina. Stanford University Press.
20.
FernándezA. (2010). El cambio de paradigma no tiene marcha atrás [The paradigm shift is not going back]. In TouzéG.GoltzmanP. (Eds.), Aportes para una nueva política de drogas [Contributions to a new drug policy] (pp. 79–84). Intercambios Asociación Civil.
21.
FettermanD. M. (2010). Ethnography: Step-by-step. Sage.
22.
GalembaR. B. (2013). Illegality and invisibility at margins and borders. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 36(2), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12027
23.
GorbaczL. (2008, March9). El peligro de judicializar el problema [The danger of judicializing the problem]. Crítica de la Argentina, 1(8), 13.
24.
GraneroJ. R. (2005). Despenalizar el uso de droga no es progresista [Decriminalizing drug use is not progressive]. Hablemos: Debate y acción, 3, 2.
25.
GrimsonA.KesslerG. (2005). On Argentina and the Southern Cone: Neoliberalism and national imaginations. Routledge.
26.
HarrisS. (2016). The social practice of harm reduction in Argentina: A “Latin” kind of intervention. Human Organization, 75(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259-75.1.1
27.
HurtadoG. (1999). El fracaso de la guerra contra las drogas [The failure of the war on drugs]. In InchaurragaS. (Ed.), Drogas y políticas públicas: El modelo de reducción de daños [Drugs and public policies: The harm reduction model] (pp. 169–189). Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Drogadependencia y SIDA.
28.
InchaurragaS. (2002). Los consumidores de drogas; cuidadanos con derechos: Una lectura desde lo social, lo subjetivo y las políticas de reducción de daños [Drug users, citizenship with rights: A reading from social, subjective, and harm reduction policies] . In Castaño PérezG. A. (Ed.), Nuevas estrategias de atención en drogodependencias: La reducción de riesgos [New strategies to drug addiction services: Risk reduction] (pp. 36–52). Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigó.
29.
InchaurragaS. (Ed.). (2003a). Las drogas: Entre el fracaso y los daños de la prohibición [Drugs: Between the failure and the harms of prohibition]. Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Drogadependencia y SIDA.
30.
InchaurragaS. (Ed.). (2003b). Drogas, políticas prohibicionistas y daños: La disyuntiva de legalizar consumos, drogas o mentiras [Drugs, prohibitionist policies, and harms: The dilemma of legalizing use, drugs, or lies]. In InchaurragaS. (Ed.), Las drogas: Entre el fracaso y los daños de la prohibición [Drugs: Between failure and the harms of prohibition] (pp. 27–48). Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Drogadependencia y SIDA.
LessaF. (2011). Beyond transitional justice: Exploring continuities in human rights abuses in Argentina between 1976 and 2010. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 3(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hur003
37.
MarshallT. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge University Press.
38.
NavarroM. (1989). The personal is political: Las madres de Plaza de Mayo. In EcksteinS. (Ed.), Power and popular protest: Latin American social movements (pp. 241–258). University of California Press.
39.
NguyenV-K. (2005). Antiretroviral globalism, biopolitics, and therapeutic citizenship. In OngA.CollierS. J. (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 124–144). Blackwell.
40.
OngA. (1999). Flexible citizenship: The cultural logics and transnationality. Duke University Press.
41.
Página 12. (2011, January3). Un fallo ratificó la despenalización de la tenencia para consumo personal [A ruling ratified decriminalization of possession for personal use]. Página 12.
42.
PetrynaA. (2002). Life exposed: Biological citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton University Press.
43.
PorterD. (2011). Health citizenship: Essays on social medicine and bio-medical politics. University of California Press.
44.
RileyD.SawkaE.ConleyP.HewittD.MiticW.PoulinC.RoomR.SingleE.ToppJ. (1999). Harm reduction: Concepts and practice: A policy discussion paper. Substance Use & Misuse, 34(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089909035632
45.
RipettaM. H.PalaciosR. (2008). La despenalización favorece a los narcotraficantes [Decriminalization favors drug traffickers]. Crítica de la Argentina, 1(164), 20–21.
46.
RossiD.PawlowiczM. P.Zunino SinghD. (2007). Accesibilidad de los usuarios de drogas a los servicios de salud en las ciudades de Buenos Aires y Rosario: La perspectiva de los trabajadores de la salud [Drug users' accessibility to health services in the cities of Buenos Aires and Rosario: The perspective of health workers]. Intercambios Asociación Civil.
47.
RuchanskyE. (2008, April). “El problema es de la sociedad, no del pibe que fuma” ["The problem is society, not the kid that smokes"]. THC, 2(9), 24–25.
48.
SorianoF. (2011, May18). Drogas: se abren 14 causas por día contra consumidores [Drugs: 14 cases filed per day against users]. Clarín.
49.
StoneK. (2016). The global state of harm reduction 2016. Harm Reduction International.
50.
SvampaM. (2005). La sociedad excluyente: La Argentina bajo el signo del Neoliberalismo[Exclusive society: Argentina under the mark of neoliberalism]. Taurus.
51.
ThomasK.GalembaR. B. (2013). Illegal anthropology: An introduction. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 36(2), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12022
52.
TouzéG. (2001). De la medicalización a la ciudadanía [From medicalization to citizenship]. Encrucijadas, 1(8), 64–71.
53.
TouzéG. (Ed.). (2006). Saberes y prácticas sobre drogas: El caso de la pasta base de cocaína [Knowledge and practices about drugs: The case of cocaine base paste]. Intercambios Asociación Civil.
54.
TouzéG. (2010). Argentina: Reform on the way? Series on legislative reform on drug policies nr. 6. Transnational Institute.
Vázquez AcuñaM. (1997). Coerción: Un factor importante que restringe el acceso de usadores de drogas y trabajadores sexuales al sistema de salud [Coercion: An important factor that restricts drug users' and sex workers' access to the health system]. In S. Inchaurraga (Ed.), Drogas y drogadependencias: Teoría, clínica e instituciones [Drugs and addiction: Theory, clinic, and instituciones]. Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Drogadependencia y SIDA.
