Individuals with alcohol problems often receive pressure to change their drinking. However, when they enter treatment it is unclear how often it is because of the pressure they received or other reasons. A secondary analysis was conducted using four cross-sectional National Alcohol Surveys collected at 5-year intervals between 1995 and 2010. Treatment seekers (N = 476) were interviewed about a) all reasons for seeking treatment, b) their primary reason, c) lifetime heavy drinking, and d) whether they ever received pressure from six different sources (spouse, family, friends, doctor, work, and police). Over 90% of the sample received pressure from at least one source. Thirty-four percent identified legal problems/felt forced as their primary reason for seeking treatment. Other primary reasons included a desire to improve relationships (25%) and health (15%). When asked about all reasons, 46% endorsed five or more reasons and 74% included legal problems/felt forced. A primary reason for seeking alcohol treatment is drinking-related legal problems or feeling forced. However, legal problems/feeling forced occurs along with a variety of additional reasons. Future research should assess pathways between receipt of pressure from different sources, recognition of different types of problems, and reasons given for seeking treatment.
DawsonD. A.GrantB. F.StinsonF. S., & ChouP. S. (2006). Estimating the effect of help-seeking on achieving recovery from alcohol dependence. Addiction, 101(6), 824–834.
2.
GreenfieldT. K., & KerrW. C. (2008). Alcohol measurement methodology in epidemiology: Recent advances and opportunities. Addiction, 103(7), 1082–1099.
3.
GreenfieldT. K.MidanikL. T., & RogersJ. D. (2000). Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption. Addiction, 95(2), 227–284.
4.
HasinD. S. (1994). Treatment/self-help for alcohol-related problems: Relationship to social pressure and alcohol dependence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55(6), 660–666.
5.
JacobsonJ. M., & AttridgeM. (2010). Employee assistance programs (EAPs): An allied profession for work/life. In SweetS. & CaseyJ. (Eds.), Work and family encyclopedia. Chestnut Hill, MA: Sloan Work and Family Research Network. Available from http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/encyclopedia_entry.php?id=17296&area=All
6.
KerrW. C.GreenfieldT. K.BondJ.YeY., & RehmJ. (2004). Age, period and cohort influences on beer, wine and spirits consumption trends in the US National Surveys. Addiction, 99(9), 1111–1120.
7.
KerrW. C.GreenfieldT. K.BondJ.YeY., & RehmJ. (2009). Age-period-cohort modeling of alcohol volume and heavy drinking days in the US National Alcohol Surveys: Divergence in younger and older adult trends. Addiction, 104(1), 27–37.
8.
KerrW. C.GreenfieldT. K., & MidanikL. T. (2006). How many drinks does it take you to feel drunk? Trends and predictors for subjective drunkenness. Addiction, 101(10), 1428–1437.
9.
KorchaR. A.PolcinD. L.GreenfieldT. K.KerrW. C., & BondJ. (2011). When does pressure facilitate help seeking? Trends and correlates from 1984 to 2005. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 37, 48–53.
10.
McLellanA. T. (2006, January 29-February 2). What are the evidence-based administrative practices? Systems issues that impede delivery of effective treatment. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Treatment of Addictive Behaviors, Santa Fe, NM.
11.
MidanikL. T., & GreenfieldT. K. (2003). Telephone versus in-person interviews for alcohol use: Results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 72(3), 209–214.
12.
MidanikL. T.HinesA. M.GreenfieldT. K., & RogersJ. D. (1999). Face-to-face versus telephone interviews: Using cognitive methods to assess alcohol survey questions. Contemporary Drug Problems, 26, 673–693.
13.
MidanikL. T.RogersJ. D., & GreenfieldT. K. (2001). Mode differences in reports of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm. In CynamonM. L. & KulkaR. A. (Eds.), Seventh Conference on Health Survey Research Methods [DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 01–1013] (pp. 129–133). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
14.
MoosR. H., & MoosB. S. (2006). Treated and untreated individuals with alcohol use disorders: Rates and predictors of remission and relapse. International Journal of Clinical Health Psychology, 6(3), 513–526.
15.
ÓlafsdóttirH.RaitasaloK.GreenfieldT. K., & AllamaniA. (2009). Concern about family members' drinking and cultural consistency: A multi-country GENACIS study. Contemporary Drug Problems, 36(1–2), 59–83.
16.
OleskiJ.MotaN.CoxB. J., & SareenJ. (2010). Perceived need for care, help seeking, and perceived barriers to care for alcohol use disorders in a national sample. Psychiatric Services, 61(12), 1223–1231.
17.
PolcinD. L., & BeattieM. (2007). Relationship and institutional pressure to enter treatment: Differences by demographics, problem severity, and motivation. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68(3), 428–436.
18.
PolcinD. L.KorchaR.GreenfieldT. K.KerrW. C., & BondJ. C. (2012). Twenty-one year trends and correlates of pressure to change drinking. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(4), 705–715.
19.
PolcinD. L., & WeisnerC. (1999). Factors associated with coercion in entering treatment for alcohol problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 54(1), 63–68.
20.
RoomR. (1989). The U.S. general population's experiences of responding to alcohol problems. British Journal of Addiction, 84(11), 1291–1304.
21.
RoomR.GreenfieldT. K., & WeisnerC. (1991). People who might have liked you to drink less: Changing responses to drinking by U.S. family members and friends, 1979–1990. Contemporary Drug Problems, 18(4), 573–595.
22.
SatreD. D.MertensJ. R.AreánP. A., & WeisnerC. (2004). Five-year alcohol and drug treatment outcomes of older adults versus middle-aged and younger adults in a managed care program. Addiction, 99(10), 1286–1297.
23.
SchmidtL., & WeisnerC. (1993). Developments in alcoholism treatment: A ten year review. In GalanterM. (Ed.), Recent Developments in Alcoholism (Vol. 11, pp. 369–396). New York: Plenum.
24.
SchmidtL. A.YeY.GreenfieldT. K., & BondJ. (2007). Ethnic disparities in clinical severity and services for alcohol problems: Results from the National Alcohol Survey. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31(1), 48–56.
25.
Stata Corp. (2009). Stata Statistical Software: Release 11.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
26.
StorbjorkJ. (2006). The interplay between perceived self-choice and reported informal, formal, and legal pressures in treatment entry. Contemporary Drug Problems, 33(4), 611–644.
27.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. (2009). The NSDUH report: Alcohol treatment: Need, utilization, and barriers. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved August 2, 2010, from http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k9/AlcTX/AlcTX.htm
28.
TriceH., & BeyerJ. (1984). Work-related outcomes of the constructive-confrontation strategy in a job-based alcoholism program. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 45(5), 393–404.
29.
TuckerJ. A.VuchinichR. E., & RippensP. D. (2004). A factor analytic study of influences on patterns of help-seeking among treated and untreated alcohol dependent persons. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 26(3), 237–242.
30.
WeisnerC.MatzgerH., & KaskutasL. A. (2003). How important is treatment? One-year outcomes of treated and untreated alcohol-dependent individuals. Addiction, 98(7), 901–911.
31.
WellsJ. E.HorwoodL. J., & FergussonD. M. (2007). Reasons why young adults do or do not seek help for alcohol problems. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41(12), 1005–1012.
32.
WilsnackR. W.WilsnackS. C.KristjansonA. F.Vogeltanz-HolmN. D., & GmelG. (2009). Gender and alcohol consumption: Patterns from the multinational GENACIS project. Addiction, 104(9), 1487–1500.
