This article considers the drug classifications and terms widely used in American survey research, and compares these to the classifications and terms used by drug users. We begin with a critical review of drug classification systems oriented to public policy, health services and survey research. We then consider the results of a pile sort exercise we conducted with 76 respondents within a study of Southeast Asian American adolescent and young adult drug users in Northern California. The pile sort aimed to clarify how respondents handled specific terms related to Ecstasy and methamphetamines. Like survey researchers, the respondents tended to separate Ecstasy from methamphetamines, but unlike survey researchers, they also created taxonomies based on consumption method and the social contexts of use. We suggest these differences reflect the tendency for survey researchers to standardize persons and experiences, and for drug users to represent their experiences as hybrid and diverse.
AhmadK. (2003). Asia grapples with spreading amphetamine abuse. Lancet, 361(9372), 1878–1879.
2.
American Prosecutors Research Institute. (2004). The Drug Evaluation and Classification (DEC) program: Targeting hardcore and impaired drivers. Alexandria, VA: American Prosecutors Research Institute, National Traffic Law Center.
3.
AmodeoM.RobbN.PeouS., & TranH. (1997). Alcohol and other drug problems among Southeast Asians: Patterns of use and approaches to assessment and intervention. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 15(3), 63–77.
4.
BeckerH. S. (1953). Becoming a marihuana user. American Journal of Sociology, 59(3), 235–242.
5.
BeckerH. S. (1967). History, culture and subjective experience: An exploration of the social bases of drug-induced experiences. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 8(3), 163–176.
6.
BeckerH. S. (1971). Culture and civility in San Francisco. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
7.
BennettJ. (2009). Welcome to Potopia: A small section of downtown Oakland has become a model for what a legalized America could look like. Why the stars are aligning for the pro-weed movement. Newsweek. Retrieved March 9, 2011, from http://www.newsweek.com/2009/10/15/welcome-to-potopia.html
8.
BoboJ. K., & HustenC. (2000). Sociocultural influences on smoking and drinking. Alcohol Research and Health, 24, 225–232.
9.
BoltonP. (2001). Local perceptions of the mental health effects of the Rwandan genocide. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189(4), 243–248.
10.
BorgattiS. P. (1992). ANTHROPAC 4.0 Methods Guide. Columbia: Analytic Technologies.
11.
BorgattiS. P. (1996). ANTHROPAC 4.98. Columbia: Analytic Technologies.
12.
BorgattiS. P. (2002). NetDraw: Graph Visualization Software. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
13.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14.
BourdieuP. (2003). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
BourgoisP.MartinezA.KralA.EdlinB. R.SchonbergJ., & CiccaroneD. (2006). Reinterpreting ethnic patterns among White and African American men who inject heroin: A social science of medicine approach. PLoS Medicine, 3(10), 1805–1815.
16.
BriegerW. R. (1994). Pile sorts as a means of improving the quality of survey data: Malaria illness symptoms. Health Education Research, 9(2), 257–260.
CampbellF. (1968). Latin and the elite tradition in education. British Journal of Sociology, 19(3), 308.
19.
CarlsonR. G.McCaughanJ. A.FalckR. S.WangJ.SiegalH. A., & DaniulaityteR. (2004). Perceived adverse consequences associated with MDMA/Ecstasy use among young polydrug users in Ohio: Implications for intervention. International Journal of Drug Policy, 15(4), 265–274.
20.
ChangJ. C.ClussP. A.RanieriL.HawkerL.BuranoskyR.DadoD. (2005). Health care interventions for intimate partner violence: What women want. Women's Health Issues, 15(1), 21–30.
21.
D'AvanzoC. E. (1997). Southeast Asians: Asian-Pacific Americans at risk for substance misuse. Substance Use & Misuse, 32(7–8), 829–848.
22.
DeJordyR.BorgattiS. P.RoussinC., & HalginD. S. (2007). Visualizing proximity data. Field Methods, 19(3), 239–263.
23.
DongreA. R.DeshmukhP. R., & GargB. S. (2008). Perceptions and health care seeking about newborn danger signs among mothers in rural Wardha. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 75(4), 325–329.
24.
DouglasM., & IsherwoodB. (1964). The world of goods. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
25.
DunlapE.JohnsonB. D.KotarbaJ. A., & FacklerJ. (2009). Making connections: New Orleans evacuees' experiences in obtaining drugs. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 41(3), 219–226.
26.
FabriciusW. V., & NagoshiC. T. (1997). Concepts of drugs: Differences in conceptual structure across groups with different levels of drug experience. Addiction, 92(7), 847–858.
27.
FabriciusW. V.NagoshiC. T., & MacKinnonD. P. (1993). Beliefs about the harmfulness of drug use in adults who use different drugs. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 7(1), 52–65.
28.
FriedmanS. R.Des JarlaisD. C., & SotheranJ. L. (1986). AIDS health education for intravenous drug users. Health Education Quarterly, 13(4), 383–393.
29.
FryerR. G.Jr.HeatonP. S.LevittS. D., & MurphyK. M. (2005). Measuring the impact of crack cocaine; NBER working paper 11318. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
30.
FurstR. T.JohnsonB. D., & DunlapE. (1999). The stigmatized image of the “crack head”: A sociocultural exploration of a barrier to cocaine smoking among a cohort of youth in New York City. Deviant Behavior, 20, 153–181.
31.
GahlingerP. G. (2001). Illegal drugs: A complete guide to their history, chemistry, use and abuse. Salt Lake City, UT: Sagebrush Press.
32.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D., & DunlapE. (2005). Subcultural evolution and illicit drug use. Addiction Research & Theory, 13(3), 217–229.
33.
GolubA., & JohnsonB. D. (2001). Variation in youthful risks of progression from alcohol tobacco to marijuana and to hard drugs across generations. American Journal of Public Health, 91(2), 225–232.
34.
GourleyM. (2004). A subcultural study of recreational Ecstasy use. Journal of Sociology, 40(1), 59–73.
35.
GrunbaumJ. A.KannL.KinchenS. A.RossJ. G.GowdaV. R.CollinsJ. L. (1999). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—National Alternative High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 1998. MMWR Surveillance Summary October 29, 1999 48(SS07), 1–44
36.
HaertzenC. A.EisenbergH. A.HooksN. T.Jr.RossF. E., & ProssM. (1979). Estimating specificity of drug and alcohol subcultural groups with slang names for drugs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47(3), 592–594.
37.
HaightW.OstlerT.BrinkJ.SheridanK., & KingeryL. (2007). A child's-eye view of parent methamphetamine abuse: Implications for helping foster families to succeed. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(1), 1–15.
38.
HallW. (2007). Psychoactive drugs of misuse: Rationalising the irrational. Lancet, 369(9566), 972.
39.
HallW. D., & LynskeyM. (2005). Is cannabis a gateway drug? Testing hypotheses about the relationship between cannabis use and the use of other illicit drugs. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 39–48.
40.
HarmanR. C. (2001). Activities of contemporary Mayan elders. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 16(1), 57–77.
41.
HeimannH. (2007). Explanatory models for addiction among migrants—A study in ethnic German migrants from the former Soviet Union, migrants from Turkey and native Germans. Suchttherapie, 8(2), 57–62.
42.
HighetG. (2004). The role of cannabis in supporting young people's cigarette smoking: A qualitative exploration. Health Education Research, 19(6), 635–643.
HinesA. M. (1993). Linking qualitative and quantitative methods in cross-cultural survey research: Techniques from cognitive science. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21(6), 729–746.
45.
HoffmannD. E., & WeberE. (2010). Medical marijuana and the law. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(16), 1453–1457.
46.
House of Commons. (2006). Drug classification: Making a hash of it? Science and Technology Committee Fifth Report of Session 2005–06. London, UK: House of Commons.
47.
HuntG.EvansK.WuE., & ReyesA. (2005). Asian American youth, the dance scene and club drugs. Journal of Drug Issues, 35, 695–731.
48.
IvesR., & GhelaniP. (2006). Polydrug use (the use of drugs in combination): A brief review. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 13(3), 225–232.
49.
JohnsonB. D. (1973). Marijuana users and drug subcultures. New York: Wiley & Sons.
50.
JohnsonB. D.BardhiF.SifaneckS. J., & DunlapE. (2006). Marijuana argot as subculture threads: Social constructions by users in New York City. British Journal of Criminology, 46(1), 46–77.
51.
KalantH. (1999). Differentiating drugs by harm potential: The rational versus the feasible. Substance Use & Misuse, 34(1), 25–34.
52.
KalantH. (2010). Drug classification: Science, politics, both or neither?Addiction, 105(7), 1146–1149.
53.
KandelD. (1975). Stages in adolescent involvement in drug use. Science, 190(4217), 912.
54.
KingC., & VorugantiL. N. P. (2002). What's in a name? The evolution of the nomenclature of antipsychotic drugs. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 27(3), 168–175.
55.
KuramotoF. H. (1994). Drug abuse prevention research concerns in Asian and Pacific Islander populations. NIDA Research Monograph, 139, 249–272.
56.
LawJ. (2009). Seeing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3(2), 239–256.
57.
LeeJ. P.BattleR. S.AntinT. M. J., & LiptonR. (2008). Alcohol use among two generations of Southeast Asians in the U.S.Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 7(4), 357–375.
58.
LeeJ. P.BattleR. S.LiptonR., & SollerB. (2010). “Smoking”: Use of cigarettes, cigars and blunts among Southeast Asian American youth and young adults. Health Education Research, 25(1), 83–96.
59.
LeeJ. P.BattleR. S., & SollerB. (2011). Thizzin'—Ecstasy use contexts and emergent social meanings. Addiction Research & Theory, 1–14. Retrieved June 15, 2011, from http://informahealthcare.com/journal/art
60.
LeeJ. P., & KirkpatrickB. S. (2005). Social meanings of marijuana use for Southeast Asian youth. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 4(3–4), 135–152.
61.
LermanP. (1967). Argot, symbolic deviance and subcultural delinquency. American Sociological Review, 32(2), 209–224.
62.
LindesmithA. B. (1938). The argot of the underworld drug addict. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 29(2), 261–278.
63.
LittleH. J. (2000). Behavioral mechanisms underlying the link between smoking and drinking. Alcohol Research and Health, 24, 215–224.
64.
LurieN. O. (1979). World's oldest on-going protest demonstration: North American Indian drinking patterns. Pacific Historical Review, 40(3), 311–332.
65.
LüscherC., & UnglessM. A. (2006). The mechanistic classification of addictive drugs. PLoS Med, 3(11), e437.
66.
MacDonaldR., & DasA. (2006). UK classification of drugs of abuse: An un-evidence-based mess. Lancet, 368(9535), 559–561.
67.
MashkovskiiM. D. (1993). Naming and classification of drugs. Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal, 27(10), 667–670.
68.
McKeganeyN. (2007). The challenge to UK drug policy. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 14(6), 559–571.
69.
MeyerhoffD. J.TizabiY.StaleyJ. K.DurazzoT. C.GlassJ. M., & NixonS. J. (2006). Smoking comorbidity in alcoholism: Neurobiological and neurocognitive consequences. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 30(2), 253–264.
70.
MitkaM. (2009). FDA exercises new authority to regulate tobacco products, but some limits remain. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(19), 2078.
71.
MosherJ. F. (2009). Litigation and alcohol policy: Lessons from the US Tobacco Wars. Addiction, 104(Suppl. 1), 27–33.
72.
NemotoT.OperarioD., & SomaT. (2002). Risk behaviors of Filipino methamphetamine users in San Francisco: Implications for prevention and treatment of drug use and HIV. Public Health Reports, 117 (Suppl. 1), 30–38.
73.
NewmeyerJ. A. (2004). San Francisco: Patterns and trends of drug use in the San Francisco Bay Area. In Epidemiologic trends in drug abuse: Vol. II. Proceedings of the community epidemiology work group (pp. 232–238). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
74.
NichterM.QuinteroG.NichterM.MockJ., & ShakibS. (2004). Qualitative research: Contributions to the study of drug use, drug abuse, and drug use(r)-related interventions. Substance Use & Misuse, 39(10–12), 1907–1969.
75.
NuttD.KingL. A., & PhillipsL. (2010). Drug harms in the UK: A multicriteria decision analysis. Lancet, 376(9752), 1558–1565.
76.
NuttD.KingL. A.SaulsburyW., & BlakemoreC. (2007). Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse. Lancet, 369(9566), 1047–1053.
77.
NyamongoI. K. (1999). Home case management of malaria: An ethnographic study of lay people's classification of drugs in Suneka Division, Kenya. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 4(11), 736.
78.
Office of Applied Statistics. (2008). Development of computer-assisted interviewing procedures for the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, Section 12. Refinement of Procedures: 1998 Laboratory and Field Testing and Final 1999 NHSDA CAI (Office of Applied Statistics, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Agency). Retrieved October 8, 2010, from http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/CompAssistInterview/chap-ter12.htm#12.2.2
ParsonsN. L. (2010). Methedrine, ice, crank, and crystal: An historical and cultural examination of methamphetamine in the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
81.
Payne-JacksonA. (1999). Biomedical and folk medical concepts of adult onset diabetes in Jamaica: Implications for treatment. Health, 3(1), 5–46.
82.
PenkaS.HeimannH.HeinzA., & Schouler-OcakM. (2008). Explanatory models of addictive behaviour among native German, Russian-German, and Turkish youth. European Psychiatry, 23(Suppl. 1), 36–42.
83.
QuinteroG. (2009). Controlled release: A cultural analysis of collegiate polydrug use. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 41(1), 39–47.
84.
QuintilianiL. M.CampbellM. K.HainesP. S., & WebberK. H. (2008). The use of the pile sort method in identifying groups of healthful lifestyle behaviors among female community college students. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 108(9), 1503–1507.
85.
ReamG. L.BenoitE.JohnsonB. D., & DunlapE. (2008). Smoking tobacco along with marijuana increases symptoms of cannabis dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95(3), 199–208.
86.
ReamG. L.JohnsonB. D.SifaneckS. J., & DunlapE. (2006). Distinguishing blunts users from joints users: A comparison of marijuana use subcultures. In ColeS. M. (Ed.), New research on street drugs (pp. 245–273). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
87.
Research Triangle Institute. (2003). 2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: CAI Specs for Programming, English Version. Rockville, MD: Author.
88.
RoomR. (2005). Multicultural contexts and alcohol and drug use as symbolic behaviour. Addiction Research & Theory, 13(4), 321–331.
89.
RosenJ. (2007). Go dumb: Why hyphy is the best hip-hop right now. Slate. Retrieved November 7, 2008, from http://www.slate.com/id/2159745/
90.
SchensulJ. J., & ConveyM. (2005). Challenges in measuring concurrency, agency and intentionality in polydrug research. Addictive Behaviors, 30(3), 571–574.
91.
SchensulJ. J.HuebnerC.SingerM.SnowM.FelicianoP., & BroomhallL. (2000). The high, the money and the fame: The emergent social context of new marijuana use among urban youth. Medical Anthropology, 18, 389–414.
92.
ShaiD. (1994). Problems of accuracy in official statistics on drug-related deaths. Substance Use & Misuse, 29(14), 1801–1811.
93.
ShepherdM. (1972). The classification of psychotropic drugs. Psychological Medicine, 2(2), 96–110.
94.
ShepherdM. (1980). Classification and psychotropic drugs. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology, 4(4–5), 447–454.
95.
SingerM. (2005). New drugs on the street: An introduction. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 4(2), 1–7.
96.
SingerM. (2006). Something dangerous: Emergent and changing illicit drug use and community health. Long Grove IL: Waveland Press.
97.
SollerB., & LeeJ. P. (2010). Drug-intake methods and social identity: The use of marijuana in blunts among Southeast Asian adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(6), 783–806.
98.
SussmanS., & HuverR. M. E. (2006). Definitions of street drugs. In ColeS. M. (Ed.), New research on street drugs (pp. 1–12). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
TarterR. E.VanyukovM.KirisciL.ReynoldsM., & ClarkD. B. (2006). Predictors of marijuana use in adolescents before and after licit drug use: Examination of the gateway hypothesis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 2134–2140.
101.
TrotterR. T., & PotterJ. M. (1993). Pile sorts, a cognitive anthropological model of drug and AIDS risks for Navajo teenagers: Assessment of a new evaluation tool. Drugs & Society, 7(3), 23–39.
102.
US Department of Justice. (2007). Title 21 United States Code (USC) Controlled Substances Act, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 1308.11 Schedule I. US Department of Justice. Retrieved October 8, 2010, from http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/21cfr/cfr/1308/1308_11.htm
103.
van AmsterdamJ.OpperhuizenA.KoeterM., & van den BrinkW. (2010). Ranking the harm of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs for the individual and the population. European Addiction Research, 16(4), 202–207.
104.
van AmsterdamJ., & van den BrinkW. (2010). Ranking of drugs: A more balanced risk-assessment. Lancet, 376(9752), 1524–1525.
105.
ViskadurakiM., & MamuneasD. (2011). “Drugs and harm to society”: Comment. Lancet, 377(9765), 553–554.
106.
WaldsteinA. (2006). Mexican migrant ethnopharmacology: Pharmacopoeia, classification of medicines and explanations of efficacy. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 108(2), 299–310.
107.
WallaceJ. (1999). Explaining race differences in adolescent and young adult drug use: The role of racialized social systems. Drugs & Society, 14(1/2), 21–36.
108.
WaltersK. L.SimoniJ. M., & Evans-CampbellT. (2002). Substance use among American Indians and Alaska natives: Incorporating culture in an “indigenist” stress-coping paradigm. Public Health Reports, 117(1), S104–S117.
109.
WellsE. A.HawkinsJ. D., & CatalanoR. F. (1988). Choosing drug use measures for treatment outcome studies. I. The influence of measurement approach on treatment results. Substance Use & Misuse, 23(8), 851–873.
110.
WilliamsonA.DarkeS.RossJ., & TeessonM. (2006). The association between cocaine use and short-term outcomes for the treatment of heroin dependence: Findings from the Australian Treatment Outcome Study (ATOS). Drug and Alcohol Review, 25(2), 141–148.
111.
WishE.FitzelleD. B.O'GradyK.HsuM., & ArriaA. (2006). Evidence for significant polydrug use among Ecstasy-using college students. Journal of American College Health, 55(2), 99–104.
112.
World Health Organization. (1997). Guidelines on the use of international nonproprietary names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization Division of Drug Management and Policies.
113.
World Health Organization. (2004). Global status report: Alcohol policy. Geneva: World Health Organization Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse.
114.
YamaguchiK., & KandelD. B. (1984). Patterns of drug use from adolescence to young adulthood: II. Sequences of progression. American Journal of Public Health, 74(7), 668–672.
115.
ZaneN., & SasaoT. (1992). Research on drug abuse among Asian Pacific Americans. Drugs & Society, 6(3–4), 181–209.
116.
ZinbergN. E. (1984). Drug, set, and setting: The social bases of controlled drug use. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
