Preference for on-premise drinking affects likelihood of aggression, but how venue affects victimization by other drinkers is less studied. We investigated influence of heavy consumption in specific venues on fighting and assaults by other drinkers in the 2000 U.S. National Alcohol Survey, a representative telephone survey of adults (n = 7,612). In the prior year 4.5% current drinkers were assaulted by drinkers, while < 2% reported fighting while drinking. Logistic regression analyses showed that where one drank most, and usual and peak amounts drunk there, each influenced risks of fighting and (less) being assaulted. For drinking and fighting, heaviest context, usual amount, and difference between usual and peak were all highly significant, but adding age and impulsivity/sensation seeking eliminated effect of venue. Victimization risk curves for maximum were exponential: A peak of 10+ drinks showed odds ratios when at another's home, one's own home, and a bar of 4.5, 5.3 and 10.3, respectively (reference 1–2 home drinks); risk curves were steeper for fighting. Maximum amount consumed dominates the venue in which one drinks the most, once selectivity based on personal characteristics is attended to. We suggest interventions should emphasize ways of addressing overdrinking within a range of settings.
BaborT. F.CaetanoR.CasswellS.EdwardsE.GiesbrechtN. A.GrahamK. (2003). Alcohol: No ordinary commodity. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
BaileyD. S., & TaylorS. P. (1991). Effects of alcohol and aggressive disposition on human physical aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 334–342.
3.
CherpitelC. J. (1994). Alcohol and injuries resulting from violence: A review of emergency room studies. Addiction, 89, 157–165.
4.
FaganJ. (1993). Set and setting revisited: Influences of alcohol and illicit drugs on the social context of violent events. In MartinS. E. (Ed.), Alcohol and interpersonal violence: Fostering multidisciplinary perspectives (NIH Publiction No. 93–3496. pp. 161–191). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
5.
GiesbrechtN. A., & GreenfieldT. K. (2003). Preventing alcohol-related problems in the US through policy: Media campaigns, regulatory approaches and environmental interventions. Journal of Primary Prevention, 24, 63–104.
6.
GiesbrechtN.GreenfieldT. K.AnglinL., & JohnsonS. (2004). Changing the price of alcohol in the United States: Perspectives from the alcohol industry, public health, and research. Contemporary Drug Problems, 31, 711–736.
7.
GrahamK.BernardsS.MunnéM., & WilsnackS. C. (2008). Unhappy hours: Alcohol and physical partner aggression in the Americas. In Scientific Technical Publication No. 631. Washington, D.C.: Pan American Health Organization.
8.
GrahamK.LeonardK. E.RoomR.WildT. C.PihlR. O.BoisC. (1998). Current directions in research on understanding and preventing intoxicated aggression. Addiction, 93, 659–676.
9.
GreenfieldT. K. (1994). Improving causal inference from naturalistic designs: Self-selection and other issues in evaluating alcohol control policies. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 2, 45–61.
10.
GreenfieldT. K. (1998). Evaluating competing models of alcohol-related harm. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 22, (Suppl. 2) 52–62.
11.
GreenfieldT. K. (2000). Ways of measuring drinking patterns and the difference they make: Experience with graduated frequencies. Journal of Substance Abuse, 12, 33–49.
GreenfieldT. K.JohnsonS. P., & GiesbrechtN. A. (2004). The alcohol policy development process: Policy makers speak. Contemporary Drug Problems, 31, 627–654.
14.
GreenfieldT. K., & KerrW. C. (2008). Alcohol measurement methodology in epidemiology: Recent advances and opportunities. Addiction, 103, 1082–1099.
15.
GreenfieldT. K.MidanikL. T., & RogersJ. D. (2000). Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption. Addiction, 95, 227–284.
16.
GreenfieldT. K.NayakM. B.BondJ.YeY., & MidanikL. T. (2006). Maximum quantity consumed and alcohol-related problems: Assessing the most alcohol drunk with two measures. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 30, 1576–1582.
17.
GreenfieldT. K., & WeisnerC. (1995). Drinking problems and self-reported criminal behavior, arrests and convictions: 1990 U.S. alcohol and 1989 county surveys. Addiction, 90, 361–373.
18.
GreenfieldT. K.YeY., & GiesbrechtN. A. (2007a). Alcohol policy opinions in the United States over a 15-year period of dynamic per capita consumption changes: Implications for today's public health practice. Contemporary Drug Problems, 34, 649–680.
19.
GreenfieldT. K.YeY., & GiesbrechtN. A. (2007b). Views of alcohol control policies in the 2000 National Alcohol Survey: What news for alcohol policy development in the U.S. and its states?Journal of Substance Use, 12, 429–445.
20.
GreenfieldT. K.YeY.KerrW. C.BondJ.RehmJ., & GiesbrechtN. A. (2009). Externalities from alcohol consumption in the 2005 US National Alcohol Survey: Implications for policy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6, 3205–3224.
21.
HoakenP. N. S., & PihlR. O. (2000). The effects of alcohol intoxication on aggressive responses in men and women. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 35, 471–477.
22.
KairouzS., & GreenfieldT. K. (2007). A comparative multilevel analysis of contextual drinking in American and Canadian adults. Addiction, 102, 71–80.
23.
KerrW. C.GreenfieldT. K.BondJ.YeY., & RehmJ. (2004). Age, period and cohort influences on beer, wine and spirits consumption trends in the US National Surveys. Addiction, 99, 1111–1120.
24.
KerrW. C.GreenfieldT.K.BondJ.YeY., & RehmJ. (2009). Age-period-cohort modeling of alcohol volume and heavy drinking days in the US National Alcohol Surveys: Divergence in younger and older adult trends.”Addiction, 104, 27–37.
25.
LauM. A.PihlR. O., & PetersonJ. B. (1995). Provocation, acute alcohol intoxication, cognitive performance and aggression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 150–155.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B.CohenM. A., & DerzonJ. H. (1997). Is there a causal relationship between alcohol use and violence? In GalanterM. (Ed.), Recent developments in alcoholism (Vol. 13). New York: Plenum Press.
28.
MacAndrewC., & EdgertonR. B. (1969). Drunken comportment: A social explanation. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.
29.
MartinS. E. (1993). Alcohol and interpersonal violence: Fostering multidisciplinary perspectives. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
30.
MidanikL. T., & GreenfieldT. K. (2002, November). Telephone versus in-person interviews for alcohol use: Results of the Year 2000 National Alcohol Survey. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association, Philadelphia, PA.
31.
MidanikL. T.GreenfieldT. K., & RogersJ. D. (2001). Reports of alcohol-related harm: Telephone versus face-to-face interviews. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 74–78.
32.
MidanikL. T.HinesA. M.GreenfieldT. K., & RogersJ. D. (1999). Face-to-face versus telephone interviews: Using cognitive methods to assess alcohol survey questions. Contemporary Drug Problems, 26, 673–693.
33.
MubayiA.GreenwoodP. E.Castillo-ChávezC.GruenewaldP., & GormanD. M. (2010). The impact of relative residence times on the distribution of heavy drinkers in highly distinct environments. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 44, 45–56.
34.
NyarongaD.GreenfieldT. K., & McDanielP. A., (2009). Drinking context and drinking problems among black, white and Hispanic men and women in the 1984, 1995 and 2005 U.S. National Alcohol Surveys. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70, 16–26.
35.
PernanenK. (1991). Alcohol in human violence. New York: The Guilford Press.
36.
PernanenK. (1993). Alcohol-related violence: Conceptual models and methodological issues. In MartinS. E. (Ed.), Alcohol and interpersonal violence: Fostering multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 37–70). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
37.
ReissA., & RothJ. (1993). Understanding and preventing violence. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
38.
RoizenJ. (1993). Issues in the epidemiology of alcohol and violence. In MartinS. E. (Ed.), Alcohol and interpersonal violence: Fostering multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 3–36). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
39.
RoizenJ. (1997). Epidemiological issues in alcohol-related violence. In GalanterM. (Ed.), Recent Developments in Alcoholism: Alcohol and violence (Vol. 13, pp. 7–40). New York: Plenum Press.
40.
SchaferJ. (1994). Latent class and factor analyses of the 1990 National Alcohol Survey adult items. Berkeley, CA: Alcohol Research Group.
41.
ScottK. D.SchaferJ. C., & GreenfieldT. K. (1999). The role of alcohol in physical assault perpetration and victimization. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 60, 528–536.
42.
Stata Corporation. (2001). Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
43.
TaylorS. P., & GammonC. B. (1975). Effects of type and dose of alcohol on human physical aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 169–175.
44.
WellsS.GrahamK., & PurcellJ. (2009). Policy implications of the widespread practice of “pre-drinking” or “pre-gaming” before going to public drinking establishments: Are current prevention strategies backfiring?Addiction, 104, 4–9.
45.
WellsS.GrahamK.SpeechleyM., & KovalJ. (2005). Drinking patterns, drinking contexts and alcohol-related aggression among late adolescent and young adult drinkers. Addiction, 100, 933–945.
