In a Dutch longitudinal study on the dynamics of cannabis dependence, at baseline 600 frequent cannabis users (? 3 days cannabis use per week in past 12 months) aged 18–30 years were interviewed. Nearly half of all participants (42%) met DSM-IV criteria for cannabis dependence in the 12 months prior to the interview. Participants were recruited by respondent-driven sampling; referrals were understood as proxy for social networks to explore peer associations and social exclusion. Analyses revealed that networks of frequent cannabis users were mostly heterogeneous. Cannabis dependence did not emerge as a main selector. However, within segments of networks some clustering of cannabis dependence (indicating differential inclusion), sex and ethnicity was found. Methodological questions are discussed regarding the applicability of respondent-driven sampling in noninjecting, nonmarginalized drug users. The study's limitations are noted.
AbramovitzD.VolzE.M.StrathdeeS. A.PattersonT.L.VeraA., & FrostS.D.W. (2009). Using respondent-driven sampling in a hidden population at risk of HIV infection: Who do HIV-positive recruiters recruit?Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 36(12), 750–756.
2.
AkersR.L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
3.
BeckerH.S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
4.
BenschopA.HarrisonL.D.KorfD.J., & EricksonP.G. (2006). Different concepts of ethnicity in a cross-Atlantic study of violence and drug use among deviant youth. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 12, 61–78.
5.
BodenJ.M.FergussonD.M., & HorwoodL.J. (2006). Illicit drug use and dependence in a New Zealand birth cohort. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 156–163.
BurtR.D.HaganH.SabinK., & ThiedeH. (2010). Evaluating respondent-driven sampling in a major metropolitan area: Comparing injection drug users in the 2005 Seattle area National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System Survey with participants in the RAVEN and Kiwi studies. Annals of Epidemiology, 20(2), 159–167.
8.
DunlapE.JohnsonB.D.SifaneckS.J., & BenoitE. (2005). Sessions, cyphers, and parties: Settings for informal social controls of blunt smoking. Journal of Ethnicity and Substance Abuse, 4(3/4), 43–80.
9.
EMCDDA (2008). A cannabis reader. Global issues and local experiences: Perspectives on cannabis controversies, treatment and regulation in Europe. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.
10.
FountainJ., & KorfD.J. (2007) Drugs in society. European perspectives. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
11.
GlueckS., & GlueckE. (1950). Unravelling juvenile delinquency. New York: The Commonwealth Fund.
12.
GoodeE. (1999). Drugs in American society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
HeckathornD.D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44, 174–199.
14.
HeckathornD.D. (2002). Respondent-driven sampling II: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems, 49(1), 11–34.
15.
HeckathornD.D.BroadheadR.S.AnthonyD.L., & WeakliemD.L. (1999). AIDS and social networks: Prevention through network mobilization. Sociological Focus, 32, 159–179.
16.
HeckathornD.D., & JeffriJ. (2001). Finding the beat: Using respondent-driven sampling to study jazz musicians. Poetics, 28, 307–329.
17.
KaplanC.D.KorfD., & SterkC. (1987) Temporal and social contexts of heroin-using populations: An illustration of the snowball sampling technique. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 566–574.
18.
KleckaW. R. (1980). Discriminant analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19.
KorfD. (1995). Dutch treat: Formal control and illicit drug use in The Netherlands. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
20.
KrausL.AugustinR., & OrthB. (2005). Illegale drogen, einstiegsalter und trends: Ergebnisse des epidemiologische suchtsurvey. Sucht, 51(1), 19–28.
21.
NoackR.HöflerM.GründlerB.A.SchulzR., & PaulK. (2009). Konsummuster als kovariablen von DSM-IV cannabisabhängigkeit. Sucht, 55(3), 137–147.
22.
PerkoniggA.GoodwinR.D.FiedlerA.BehrendtS.BeesdoK.LiebR. (2008). The natural course of cannabis use, abuse and dependence during the first decades of life. Addiction, 103, 439–449.
23.
van der PolP.LiebregtsN.De GraafR.KorfD.J.Van den BrinkW., & Van LaarM. (2010). Methods and objectives of the Dutch Cannabis Dependence Study (CanDep) on the course of frequent cannabis use and dependence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
24.
ReinarmanC., & CohenP. (2007). Lineaments of cannabis culture: Rules regulating use in Amsterdam and San Francisco. Contemporary Justice Review, 10(4), 393–410.
25.
ReisnerS.L.MimiagaM.J.JohnsonC.V.BlandS.CaseP.SafrenS.A. (2010). What makes a respondent-driven sampling “seed” productive? Example of finding at-risk Massachusetts men who have sex with men. Journal of Urban Health, 87(3), 467–479.
26.
SalganikM., & HeckathornD.D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34, 193–239.
27.
SPSS. (1999). SPSS base 10.0 applications guide. Chicago: Author.
28.
SutherlandE. H. (1947). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
29.
UuskülaA.JohnstonL.G.RaagM.TrummalA.TaluA., & Des JarlaisD.C. (2010). Evaluating recruitment among female sex workers and injecting drug users at risk for HIV using respondent-driven sampling in Estonia. Journal of Urban Health, 87(2), 304–317.
30.
VervaekeH.K.E.van DeursenL., & KorfD.J. (2008). The role of peers in the initiation and continuation of ecstasy use. Substance Use & Misuse, 43(5), 633–646.
31.
WangJ.CarlsonR.G.FalckR.S.SiegalH.A.RahmanA., & LiL. (2005). Respondent-driven sampling to recruit MDMA users: A methodological assessment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 78, 147–157.
32.
WattanaW.van GriensvenF.RhucharoenpornpanichO.ManopaiboonC.ThienkruaW.BannathamR. (2007). Respondent-driven sampling to assess characteristics and estimate the number of injection drug users in Bangkok, Thailand. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, 228–233.
33.
WattersJ.K., & BiernackiP. (1989). Targeted sampling: Options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 36(4), 416–430.
34.
WeermanF.M.BijleveldC.C.J.H., & AverdijkM.D.E. (2005). Netwerken en netwerkposities van delinquente en niet-delinquente jongeren. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 47, 24–41.
35.
WoutersM., & KorfD.J. (2009). Access to licensed cannabis supply and the separation of markets policy in the Netherlands. Journal of Drug Issues, 39(3), 627–652.
36.
ZinbergN.E. (1984). Drug, set and setting: The basis for controlled intoxicant use. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
