Developing a Data Resource to Support State Substance Abuse Prevention Planning: Approaches Used in Implementing CSAP's Strategic Prevention Framework

Abstract

A number of data collection systems designed to monitor selected substance abuse behaviors and consequences are in place in the United States. Some of these systems provide only national-level data, while others provide data disaggregated by state and in some cases by sub-state units such as counties or communities. Less progress has been made in identifying a key set of epidemiologic indicators across the three major substance categories (i.e., alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drugs), and assembling them in a manner designed to effectively support substance abuse prevention planning at the state and local levels.

A recent federal initiative funded by the U.S. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) seeks to accelerate progress in this area through its Strategic Prevention Framework (SPF). The framework is intended to stimulate the prudent use of available data, and the development of additional data resources, for: 1) identifying statewide priorities for substance abuse prevention, 2) informing resource allocation decisions, 3) monitoring state and local trends in substance abuse and related consequences, and 4) evaluating state and local prevention efforts. This article describes the underlying rationale and issues considered in developing the database, some of the challenges and limitations in applying the data to prevention planning processes, and current strategies employed by CSAP to guide states and communities in effectively using the data in their substance abuse prevention planning and monitoring efforts.

Keywords

Data collection prevention monitor alcohol tobacco illicit drugs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Birkmayer

J. D.

Holder

H. D.

Yacoubian

G. S.

, & Friend

K. B.

(2004). A general causal model to guide alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug prevention: Assessing the research evidence. Journal of Drug Education, 24(2), 121–153.

Gorman

D. M.

& LaBouvie

E. W.

(2000). Using social indicators to inform community drug and alcohol prevention policy. Journal of Public Health Policy, 21, 428–446.

Herman-Stahl

Wiesen

C. A.

Flewelling

R. L.

Weimer

B. J.

Bray

R. M.

, & Rachal

J. V.

(2001). Using social indicators to estimate county-level substance use intervention and treatment needs. Substance Use and Misuse, 36(4), 501–521.

Join Together. How do we know we are making a difference: A community alcohol, tobacco, and drug indicators handbook. (2005). Boston, MA: Join Together.

Mammo

, & French

J. F.

(1998). Using social indicators to predict addiction. Substance Use and Misuse, 33, 2499–2513.

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE). (2008). Logic Models for the Prevention of Alcohol, Tobacco, and other Drug Problems. Retrieved February 22, 2008, from http://www.pire.org/logicmodels.htm.

Schopper

Torres

Pereira

Ammon

Cuenda

Alonso

Baylin

Ronchi

, & Rougemont

(2005). Setting health priorities in a Swiss Canton: What do different methods tell us? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54, 388–393.

Siegal

H. A.

Carlson

R. G.

Kenne

D. R.

Starr

, & Stephens

R.C.

(2000). The Ohio substance abuse monitoring network: Constructing and operating a statewide epidemiologic intelligence system. American Journal of Public Health, 90(2), 1835–37.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2007a). SAMHSA's Prevention Platform. Retrieved February 22, 2008, from http://prevention.samhsa.gov/about/spf.aspx.

10.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2008b). State Epidemiological Data System. Retrieved February 22, 2008, from http://www.epidcc.samhsa.gov/.

11.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2008c). State Estimation Methodology. Retrieved February 22, 2008, from http://www.epidcc.samhsa.gov/.

12.

Washington State Department of Health. (2005). Guidelines for working with small numbers. Retrieved February 22, 2008, from http://www.doh.wa.gov/Data/Guidelines/SmallNumbers.htm.

13.

Word Health Organization (WHO). (2000). International guide for monitoring alcohol consumption and related harm. Geneva: WHO, Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence.