This article presents a case of self-staged, therapeutic use of MDMA (Ecstasy) in a small group of friends in Norway. The analysis focuses on the ways in which legitimacy is built for the practice, and therefore attends to tropes, assumptions, and conceptual and practical conditions of possibility involved in the participants' reflections over their drug taking. Three dimensions of these reflections are emphasised: the significance attributed to the setting of drug use, the differential representations of the psychotropic effects of MDMA and LSD, and the pharmaco-therapeutic rationality with which their MDMA use was organized and conceived. The article argues that, amid “pharmaceutical normalcy” as cultural paradigm for how health and responsibility is conceived in late modern societies, a tension arises between sociable and self-developmental modalities of motivation for recreational drug use.
BarryA.OsborneT., & RoseN. (1993). Liberalism, neo-liberalism and governmentality: An introduction. Economy and Society, 22, 265–266.
2.
BeckU. & RutherfordJ. (2001). Zombie categories: Interview with Ulrich Beck. In Beck-GernsheimE. & BeckU. (Eds.), Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.
3.
BlackwellJ. S. (1983). Drifting, controlling, and overcoming: Opiate users who avoid becoming chronically dependent. Journal of Drug Issues, 13, 219–236.
4.
BogenschutzM. (2000). Drug information libraries on the Internet. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 32, 249–258.
5.
BonatiM. & ClavennaA. (2005). The epidemiology of psychotropic drug use in children and adolescents. International Review of Psychiatry, 17, 181–188.
6.
BuntonR.NettletonS., & BurrowsR. (Eds.). (1995). The sociology of health promotion: Critical analyses of consumption, lifestyle and risk. London: Routledge.
7.
BurchellG.GordonC.MillerP., & FoucaultM. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality: With two lectures and an interview with Michel Foucault. London: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
8.
CoffieldF. & GoftenL. (1994). Drugs and young people. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
9.
DecorteT. (2000). The taming of cocaine: Cocaine use in European and American cities. Brussels: VUB University Press.
10.
DegenhardtL. & ToppL. (2003). ‘Crystal meth’ use among polydrug users in Sydney's dance party subculture: Characteristics, use patterns and associated harms. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14, 17–24.
11.
DuffC. (2004). Drug use as a ‘practice of the self’: Is there any place for an ‘ethics of moderation’ in contemporary drug policy?International Journal of Drug Policy, 15, 385–393.
12.
DuffC. (2005). Party drugs and party people: Examining the ‘normalization’ of recreational drug use in Melbourne, Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16, 161–170.
13.
DumitJ. (2002a). Drugs for life. Molecular Interventions, 2, 124–127.
14.
DumitJ. (2002b). The next new you: Prescribing ethics for pharmaceutical selves. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association. November 2002, New Orleans.
15.
DumitJ. (2003). Is it me or my brain? Depression and neuroscientific facts. Journal of Medical Humanities, 24, 35–47.
16.
EcksS. (2005). Pharmaceutical citizenship: Antidepressant marketing and the promise of demarginalisation in India. Anthropology & Medicine, 12(3), 239–254.
17.
FraserS. (2004). ‘It's your life!’: Injecting drug users, individual responsibility and hepatitis C prevention. Health, 8, 199–221.
18.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19.
GomartE. & HennionA. (1999). A sociology of attachment: Music amateurs and drug addicts. In LawJ. & HassardJ., (Eds.). Actor network theory and after. Oxford.
20.
GrecoM. (1993). Psychosomatic subjects and the “duty to be well”: Personal agency within medical rationalities. Economy and Society, 22, 357–372.
21.
GrundJ.-P. C. (1993). Drug use as a social ritual: Functionality, symbolism and determinants of self-regulation. Rotterdam: IVO.
22.
HaenflerR. (2006). Straight Edge: Hardcore punk, clean-living youth, and social change. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
23.
HildenP. K. (2003). Risk and late modern health: Socialities of a crossed-out pancreas. (PhD dissertation, University of Oslo, 2003).
24.
HildenP. K. (2008). Selvets farmasøyter: Om ulovlig stoff bruk og kulturell legitimitet. (Pharmacists of the self: Illicit drug use and cultural legitimacy). Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift, 2008(1), 29–41.
25.
HuntG. & BarkerJ.. (2001). Socio-cultural anthropology and alcohol and drug research: Towards a unified theory. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 165–188.
26.
HusebyeT. (2002). Fra margin til mainstream. (From margin to mainstream)Rus og avhengighet, 2002(2), 20–22.
27.
Jackson-JacobsC. (2001). Refining rock: Practical and social features of self-control among a group of college student crack users. Contemporary Drug Problems, 28, 597–624.
28.
LakoffA. (2005). Pharmaceutical reason: Knowledge and value in global psychiatry. Cambridge studies in society and the life sciences. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
LarsenE. (1995). Straight edge, et alternativt avholdsmiljø (Straight Edge: An alternative abstinence subculture). Report. Department of Criminology, University of Oslo.
30.
LensonD. (1995). On drugs. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
31.
LovellA. M. (2006). Addiction markets: The case of high-dose buprenor-phine in France. In KleinmanA.LakoffA. & PetrynaA., (Eds.), Global pharmaceuticals: Ethics, markets, practices. Durham: Duke University Press.
32.
LuptonD. (1995). The imperative of health: Public health and the regulated body. London: Sage Publications.
33.
MiddelthonA.-L. (2006). Farmakologisering av mat (The pharmacologization of food). Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift, 2008, 261–267.
34.
MoenE. S. (2002, November 2). Gutten som ville bli prins (The boy who wanted to be a prince). Verdens Gang. Oslo, pp. 35–38.
35.
MooreD. (2004a). Drugalities: The generative capacities of criminalized ‘drugs’. International Journal of Drug Policy, 15, 419–426.
36.
MooreD. (2004b). Governing street-based injecting drug users: A critique of heroin overdose prevention. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 1547–1557.
37.
MooreD. & FraserS. (2006). Putting at risk what we know: Reflecting on the drug using subject in harm reduction and its political implications. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 3035–3047.
38.
O'MalleyP. (1999). Consuming risks: Harm minimization and the government of ‘drug-users’. In SmandychR. C. (Ed.). Governable places: Readings on governmentality and crime control. Advances in criminology. Aldershot: Ashgate.
39.
O'MalleyP. & ValverdeM. (2004). Pleasure, Freedom and Drugs: The uses of ‘pleasure’ in liberal governance of drug and alcohol consumption. Sociology, 38, 25–42.
40.
OgdenJ. (1995). Psychosocial theory and the creation of the risky self. Social Science & Medicine, 40, 409–415.
41.
OlsenK. (2004, October 5). Dopingbeslagene firedoblet (Doping seizures quadrupled). Aftenposten. Oslo.
42.
PapeH. & StorvollE. E. (2007). Ungdom og narkotikabruk—mot normalt? (Youth and drug use) In KvalemI. L. & WichstrømL. (Eds.), Ung i Norge: Psykososiale utfordringer (Young in Norway: Psychosocial challenges) (pp. 145–160) Oslo: Cappelen akademisk forl.
43.
ParkerH. J.AldridgeJ., & MeashamF. (1998). Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use (Adolescence and society. London; New York: Routledge.
44.
PetersenA. (1997). Risk, governance and the new public health. In PetersenA., & BuntonR. (Eds.), Foucault, Health and Medicine (pp. 189–206) London: Routledge.
45.
PetersenA., & LuptonD. (1996). The new public health: Health and self in the age of risk. London: Sage.
46.
PetrynaA.LakoffA., & KleinmanA. (Eds.). (2006). Global pharmaceuticals: Ethics, markets, practices. Durham: Duke University Press.
47.
PowellD. (1973). A pilot study of occasional heroin users. Archives of General Psychiatry, 28, 589–594.
48.
RantalaK. & SulkunenP. (2003). The communitarian preventive paradox: Preventing substance misuse without the substance. Critical Social Policy, 23, 477–497.
49.
RedheadS. (1993). The politics of Ecstasy. In RedheadS. (Ed.). Rave off: Politics and deviance in contemporary youth culture (pp. 7–27). Aldershot: Avebury.
50.
RobinsL.DavisD., & GoldwinD. (1974). Drug use by U.S. army enlisted men in Vietnam: A follow-up on their return home. American Journal of Epidemiology, 99(4), 235–249.
RoseN. (2003b). The neurochemical self and its anomalies. In DoyleA. & EricsonR.V. (Eds.). Risk and morality (pp. 407–437). Green College thematic lecture series. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
53.
SchüllN. D. (2006). Machines, medication, modulation: Circuits of dependency and self-care in Las Vegas. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 30, 223–247.
54.
ShinerM. & NewburnT. (1997). Definitely, maybe not? The normalization of recreational drug use amongst young people. Sociology, 31, 511–529.
55.
SilcottM. (1999). Rave America: New School Dancescapes. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ECW Press.
SmandychR. C. (Ed.). (1999). Governable places: Readings on governmentality and crime control (Advances in criminology). Aldershot: Ashgate.
58.
SolowijN.HallW., & LeeN. (1992). Recreational MDMA use in Sydney: A profile of “Ecstasy” users and their experiences with the drug. British Journal of Addiction, 87, 1161–1172.
59.
Sosial- og helsedepartementet. (1997). St. meld. nr. 16 (1996–1997). Narkotikapolitikken (Report to the parliament: Drug policy). Oslo: Det kongelige sosial- og helsedepartement.
60.
StrathernM. (1992). After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century (The Lewis Henry Morgan lectures; 1989). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
StrathernM. (1995). The nice thing about culture is that everyone has it. In StrathernM. (Ed.). Shifting contexts: Transformations in anthropological knowledge (pp. 153–185). ASA Decennial Conference Series: The uses of knowledge: Global and local relations. London: Routledge.
62.
SzaszT. (1974). Ceremonial chemistry: The ritual persecution of drugs, addicts, and pushers. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
63.
SznitmanS. R. (2007). Socially integrated drug users. Between deviance and normality. PhD thesis. Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD), Stockholm University.
64.
ThorntonS. (1995). Club cultures: Music, media and subcultural capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.
65.
VatneL. (2005). -Tar amfetamin for å klare eksamen (Uses amphetamine to cope with exams). Dagens Medisin, 25 April 2005.
66.
WaldorfD.MurphyS., & ReinarmanC. (1991). Cocaine changes: The experience of using and quitting. Health, society, and policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
67.
WeinzierlR. & MuggletonD. (2003). What is ‘Post-Subcultural Studies’ anyway? In MuggletonD. & WeinzierlR. (Eds.). The Post-subcultures reader (pp. 3–26). Oxford: Berg.
68.
WilsonB. (2002). The Canadian Rave scene and five theses on youth resistance. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 27, 373–412.
69.
WilsonB. (2006). Fight, flight or chill: Subcultures, youth, and rave in the twenty-first century. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
70.
ZinbergN. E. (1984). Drug, set, and setting: The basis for controlled intoxicant use. New Haven: Yale University Press.
