The data analyzed came from Gender, Alcohol and Culture: An International Study and involve population surveys for 18 countries (total N = 34,916). The article studies gender and country differences in the relationship between social pressure to drink less experienced by individuals, considering seeking help for alcohol problems, and alcohol consumption and problem levels (AUDIT). In most countries for both men and women, informal control was applied most often by the spouse or partner, while reporting such controls from any source seemed more common in low- and middle-income countries. In all countries studied, men reported substantially more social control efforts than women. The hypothesis was not maintained that drinking control and help-seeking were more common for heavier drinkers and those with more drinking-related harms. However, there appeared to be a relationship between a country's aggregate level of drinking and the extent to which social control efforts were reported. Higher correlations between drinking and problem levels on the one hand, and spouses' and other family members' concerns on the other, may be suggestive of a cultural consistency in societal responses to drinking and alcohol-related problems.
AdalbjarnardottirS., & HafsteinssonL. G. (2001). Adolescents' perceived parenting styles and their substance use: Concurrent and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(4), 401–423.
2.
AhlströmS.BloomfieldK.KnibbeR.AllamaniA.ChoquetM.CiprianiF. (2001). Gender differences in the drinking patterns in nine European countries: Descriptive findings. Substance Abuse22(1), 69–85.
3.
BaborT. F.CaetanoR.CasswellS.EdwardsG.GiesbrechtN. A.GrahamK.GrubeJ.GruenewaldP.HillL.HolderH. D.HomelR.OsterbergE.RehmJ.RoomR., & RossowI. (2003). Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity. Research and public policy. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
4.
BennettJ. B., & LehmanW. E. K. (Eds.). (2003). Prevention workplace abuse: Beyond drug testing to wellness. Washington, DC: American psychological Association.
5.
BruunK. (1985). Kön och klass (Gender and class). In BruunK., & FrånbergP. (Eds.). Den svenska supen: En historia om brännvin, Bratt och Byråkrati (Swedish drink. A story on boozing, Bratt and bureaucracy) (pp. 298–317). Stockholm: Prisma.
6.
CarsonK. D., & BalkinD. B. (1992). An employee assistance model of health care management for employees with alcohol-related problems, Journal of Employment Counseling, 29, 146–56.
7.
EwingJ. A. (1998). Screening for alcoholism using CAGE. Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye opener, Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1904–1905.
8.
HaugeR., & Irgens-JensenO. (1987). Alkoholen i Norden. En sammenlignende undersøkelse av bruk av alkohol, holdninger til alkoholog konsekvenser av alkoholbruk I Finland, Island, Norge og Sverige (Alcohol in the Nordic countries. A comparative study of use, attitudes and consequences in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden). Appendix to Alcohol Policy—Journal of Nordic Alcohol Research, 4, pp. 1–56.
9.
HolmilaM. (1987). Young families and alcohol use in Finland and the Soviet Union. Contemporary Drug Problems, 14, 649–672.
10.
HolmilaM. (1988). Wives, husbands and alcohol. A study of informal drinking control within the family. (Vol. 36). Helsinki: Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies.
11.
HolmilaM.MustonenH., & RannikE. (1990). Alcohol use and its control in Finnish and Soviet marriages. British Journal of Addictions, 85(4), 509–520.
12.
HumphreysK. (2004). Circles of recovery. Self-help organizations for addictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
JärvinenM. (1991). The controlled controllers: Women, men, and alcohol. Contemporary Drug Problems, 18(3), 389–406.
14.
KnibbeR. A.DerickxM.KuntscheS.GrittnerU., & BloomfieldK. (2006). A comparison of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) in general population surveys in nine European countries. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 41, Supplement 1, pp. 19–25.
15.
Koski-JännesA. (1991). The role of children in the recovery of alcoholic clients: Preliminary observations. Contemporary Drug Problems, 18,(4), 629–643.
16.
MäkeläP.GmelG.GrittnerU.KuendigH.KuntscheS.BloomfieldK. (2006). Drinking patterns and their gender difference in Europe. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 41, Supplement 1, pp. i8–i18.
17.
MillerP., & PlantM. (2003). Family, peer influence and substance use: Findings from a study of UK teenagers. Journal of Substance Use, 8(1), 19–26.
18.
ObotI., & RoomR. (Eds.) (2005). Alcohol, gender and drinking problems. Perspectives from low and middle income countries. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
19.
PolcinD. L.GallowayG.P., & GreenfieldT.K. (2006). Measuring confrontation during recovery from addiction. Substance Use & Misuse, 41(3), 369–392.
20.
PolcinD. L. & GreenfieldT.K. (2003). Factors associated with probation officers use of criminal justice coercion to mandate alcohol treatment. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 29, 647–670.
21.
PolcinD. L., & GreenfieldT. K. (2006). Confrontation about potential harm related to substance use: Changes in the correlates of confrontation in sober living houses, Therapeutic Communities Journal, 27(3), 373–385.
22.
RaitasaloK. (2003). Interpretations of survey questions on one's partner's alcohol consumption. Contemporary Drug Problems, 30(3), 701–723.
23.
RoomR. (1989). The U.S. general populations' experiences of responding to alcohol problems. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 1291–1304.
24.
RoomR.BondyS., & FerrisJ. (1996). Determinants of suggestions for alcohol treatment. Addiction, 91(5), 643–655.
25.
RoomR.GreenfieldT. K., & WeisnerC. (1991). “People who might have liked you to drink less”; Changing responses to drinking by U.S. family members and friends, 1979–1990. Contemporary Drug Problems, 18(4), 573–595.
26.
RoomR.JerniganD. H.MarlattB. C.GurejeO.MäkeläK.MarshallM.Medina-MoraM.E. (2002). Alcohol in Developing Societies. A public health approach. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
27.
SaundersJ. B.AaslandO. G.BaborT. F.de la FuenteJ. R., & GrantM. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.
28.
SelinK. H. (Ed.) (2004). Svenska dryckesvanor och deras konsekvenser i början av det nya milleniet. University of Stockholm: Forskningsrapport nr 20 SoRAD, Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs.
29.
Vogeltanz-HolmN. D.NeveR. J. M.GreenfieldT. K.WilsnackR. W.KubickaL.WilsnackS. C. (2004). A cross-cultural analysis of women's drinking and drinking-related problems in five countries: Findings from the International Research Group on Gender and Alcohol. Addiction Research & Theory, 12(1), 31–40.
30.
WilsnackR.W.WilsnackS. C.KirstjansonA.F.Vogeltanz-HolmN.D., & GmelG. (2005). Gender and alcohol consumption: Patterns from the multinational GENACIS project. Tables 1–4, and 6–10 for Gender and alcohol consumption: Patterns from the multinational GENACIS project. Draft: May. Paper presented to GENACIS at the Pre Symposium (May 27–29) of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Kettil Bruun Society for Social and Epidemiological Research on Alcohol, Riverside, California, U.S.A., May 30–June 3.
