Drawing on findings from the SSI Study and other research, this paper takes up various policy questions fundamental to any welfare program for substance abusers. The paper considers the place of disability benefits in the U.S. system of categorical aid and the problems raised by substance abuse for the disability category. It discusses the desirable objectives of a welfare program for substance abusers and the various mechanisms by which they might be achieved. And finally, it considers how any new program might be positioned in the context of categorical aid and American federalism.
AbramovitzMimi (1988). Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present.Boston: South End Press.
2.
BaumohlJim (1992a). Addiction and the American debate about homelessness.British Journal of Addiction,87: 7–10.
3.
BaumohlJim (1992b). Hope needs work: Picking up from Hopper and Hawks.British Journal of Addiction,87: 15–16.
4.
BaumohlJim and JaffeJerome (2001). Treatment, history of, in the United States. In De WittR.C. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Drugs, Alcohol, and Addictive Behavior (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company), 1116–1130.
5.
BaumohlJim and TracySarah W. (1994). Building systems to manage inebriates: The divergent paths of California and Massachusetts, 1891–1920.Contemporary Drug Problems,21: 557–597.
6.
BiernackiPatrick (1986). Pathways from Heroin Addiction: Recovery Without Treatment.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7.
BlumbergLeonard U., ShipleyThomas F.Jr., and BarskyStephen F. (1978). Liquor and Poverty: Skid Row as a Human Condition.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.
8.
California Institute for Mental Health (2000). The CalWORKs Project: The Prevalence of Mental Health, Alcohol and Other Drug, and Domestic Violence Issues among CalWORKs Participants in Kern and Stanislaus Counties (Sacramento, CA: Author).
9.
CampbellKevin, BaumohlJim, and HuntSharon R. (2003). The bottom line: Employment and barriers to work among former SSI drug addiction and alcoholism beneficiaries.Contemporary Drug Problems,30: 195–240.
10.
CatalanoR. and McConnellW. (1999). Psychiatric emergencies: The check effect revisited.Journal of Health and Social Behavior,40: 79–86.
11.
Committee on Addictions of the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry (2002). Responsibility and personal choice in addiction,Psychiatric Services,53:707–713.
12.
CulhaneDennis P., MetrauxStephen, and HadleyTrevor (2002). Public service reductions associated with placement of homeless persons with severe mental illness in supportive housing.Housing Policy Debate,13: 107–163.
13.
CurrieElliott (1993). Reckoning: Drugs, the Cities, and the American Future.New York: Hill and Wang.
14.
DasingerLisa, SpeiglmanRichard, and NorrisJean (December 2002). Alameda County CalWORKs Needs Assessment and Outcomes Study Report # 5: The Relationship of Barriers, Supportive Services, Income, and Health Insurance with Work and Welfare over 27 Months. Berkeley, CA: Public Health Institute.
15.
DavisMartha F. (1993). Brutal Need: Lawyers and the Welfare Rights Movement, 1960–1973.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
DevineEdward T. (1904). The Principles of Relief.New York: The Macmillan Company.
17.
EdinKathryn and LeinLaura (1997). Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work,New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
ElbogenEric B., SwansonJeffrey W., and SwartzMarvin S. (2002, April). Mandated community treatment and multiple forms of leverage in mental health services.Paper presented at NIMH Conference on Evidence in Mental Health Services Research.Washington, D.C.
19.
FleischerDoris Zames and ZamesFrieda (2001). The Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to Confrontation.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
20.
GordonLinda (1994). Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare.New York: The Free Press.
21.
GreenbergMark and BaumohlJim (1996). Income maintenance: Little now, less on the way. In BaumohlJim (ed.), Homelessness in America (Phoenix: Oryx Press), 63–77.
22.
GuydishJoseph, PonathClaudia, BostromAlan, CampbellKevin, and BarronNancy (2003). Effects of losing SSI benefits on standard drug and alcohol outcome measures.Contemporary Drug Problems.30: 169–193.
23.
HanrahanPatricia, LuchinsDaniel J., SavageCourtenay, PatrickGail, RobertsDavid, and ConradKendon J. (2002). Representative payee programs for persons with mental illness in Illinois.Psychiatric Services,53: 190–194.
24.
HarrisonL.H. (1997). The validity of self-reported drug use in survey research: An overview and critique of research methods. In HarrisonL.H. and HughesA. (eds.), The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates. (DHHS Publication No. ADM 97-4147, pp. 17–36.) Washington. DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
25.
HillerM.L., KnightK., BroomeK.M., and SimpsonD.D. (1998). Legal pressure and treatment retention in a national sample of long-term residential programs.Criminal Justice and Behavior,25: 463–481.
26.
HollisterJr., RobinsonG., PeterKemper, and MaynardRebecca A. (eds.) (1984). The National Supported Work Demonstration.Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
27.
HopperKim (1992). On not leaving it to thefeuilletons. British Journal of Addiction,87: 12–14.
28.
HopperKim and BaumohlJim (1994). Held in abeyance: Rethinking homelessness and advocacy.American Behavioral Scientist,37: 522–552.
29.
HuntSharon R. (2000). Drug addiction and alcoholism as qualifying impairments for Social Security benefits: The history, controversies, and congressional response. Ph.D. dissertation, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
30.
HuntSharon R. and BaumohlJim (2003a). Drink, drugs, and disability: An introduction to the controversy.Contemporary Drug Problems,30: 9–76.
31.
HuntSharon R. and BaumohlJim (2003b). Now invited to testify: Former beneficiaries appraise the SSI drug addiction and alcoholism program.Contemporary Drug Problems,30: 455–499.
32.
LenderMark Edward and MartinJames Kirby (1987, revised and expanded). Drinking in America: A History.New York: The Free Press.
33.
LevineHarry Gene (1978). The discovery of addiction: Changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in American history.Journal of Studies on Alcohol,39: 143–174.
34.
LoprestPamela (1999). Families Who Left Welfare and How They Are Doing.Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
35.
Manpower Demonstration and Research Corporation (MDRC) (1980). Summary and Findings of the National Supported Work Demonstration.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
36.
McLellanThomas A., LewisDavid, O'BrienCharles P., and KleberHerbert (2000). Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: Implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation.Journal of the American Medical Association,284(13): 1689–1695.
37.
National Low Income Housing Coalition (2002). Rental Housing for America's Poor Families: Farther Out of Reach Than Ever.http://www.nlihc.org/oor2002/.
38.
NorrisJean, ScottRichard. SpeiglmanRichard, and GreenRex (2003). Homelessness, hunger and material hardship among those who lost SSI.Contemporary Drug Problem,30: 241–273.
39.
NorrisJean, SpeiglmanRichard, and DasingerLisa (2002). San Joaquin County CalWORKs Needs Assessment and Outcomes Study Report #1: Health and Other Potential Barriers to Working and Self-Sufficiency. Berkeley, CA: Public Health Institute.
40.
OrwickBeth Hensley (2001), “Bartender, I'll have a beer and a disability”; alcoholism and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Affirming the importance of the individualized inquiry in determining the definition of disability.St. Louis University Public Law Review,20: 195–222.
41.
PollackHarold A., DanzigerSheldon, SeefeldtKristin S., and JayakodyRukmalie (2002). Substance use among welfare recipients: Trends and policy responses.Social Service Review,76: 256–274.
42.
RankMark Robert (1994). Living on the Edge: The Realities of Welfare in America,New York: Columbia University Press.
43.
RingenbachPaul T. (1973). Tramps and Reformers, 1873–1916: The Discovery of Unemployment in New York.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
44.
Rogers-DillonRobin, UnisSharon, and VerbaMichael (August 30, 2002). Reducing homelessness and criminal recidivism: Caseload dynamics of the Ready, Willing & Able program & ComALERT programs (unpublished report).
45.
RoizenRon (1987). The great controlled-drinking controversy. In GalanterMarc (ed.), Recent Developments in Alcoholism, Volume 5 (New York: Plenum Press), 245–279.
46.
RosenMarc I., RosenheckRobert A., ShanerAndrew L., EckmanThad A., GamacheGail, and KrebsChristopher (2002). Substance abuse and the need for money management assistance among psychiatric inpatients.Drug and Alcohol Dependence,67: 331–334.
47.
RosenheckRobert and FrismanLinda K. (1996). Do public support payments encourage substance abuse?Health Affairs,15: 192–200.
48.
RosenheckRobert, LamJulie, and RandolphFrances (1997). Impact of representative payees on substance use by homeless persons with serious mental illness.Psychiatric Services,48: 800–806.
49.
SchramSanford F. and SossJoe (2001). Success stories: Welfare reform, policy discourse, and the politics of research.The Annals. No. 577 (September 2001): 49–65.
50.
ScottRichard and BaumohlJim (2003). Decisions to appeal, decisions to approve: Requalification for SSI by former DA&A beneficiaries.Contemporary Drug Problems,30: 147–168.
51.
ShanerAndrew, EckmanThad, RobertsLisa J., WilkinsJeffrey N., TuckerDouglas E., TsuangJohn W., and MintzJim (1995, September 21). Disability income, cocaine use, and repeated hospitalization among schizophrenic cocaine abusers—government sponsored revolving door.New England Journal of Medicine,333: 777–783.
52.
ShanerA., RobertsL.J., EckmanT.A., TuckerD.E., TsuangJ.W., WilkinsJ.N., and MintzJ. (1997). Monetary reinforcement of abstinence from cocaine among mentally ill patients with cocaine dependence.Psychiatric Senvices,48: 807–814.
53.
SimpsonD.D., JoeG.W., and BroomeK.M. (2002). A national 5-year follow-up of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence.Archives of General Psychiatry,59: 538–544.
54.
SkidmoreFelicity (1984). The impacts of supported work on former drug addicts. In HollisterRobinson G.Jr., KemperPeter, and MaynardRebecca A. (eds.), The National Supported Work Demonstration (Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press), 136–171.
55.
SobellL.C., EllingstadT.P., and SobellM.B. (2000). Natural recovery from alcohol and drug problems: Methodological review of the research with suggestions for future directions.Addiction,95: 749–764.
56.
SobellM.B and SobellL.C. (1995). Controlled drinking after 25 years: How important was the debate?Addiction,90: 1149–1153.
57.
SpeiglmanRichard, NorrisJean, KappagodaShanthi, GreenRex, and MartinovichZoran (2003). SSI receipt and alcohol and other drug use among former SSI DA&A beneficiaries.Contemporary Drug Problems,30: 291–333.
58.
StoneDeborah (1984). The Disabled State,Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
59.
SwartzJames A., CampbellKevin, BaumohlJim, and TonkinPeggy (2003). Drug treatment participation and retention rates among former recipients of Supplemental Security Income for drug addiction and alcoholism.Contemporary Drug Problems,30: 335–364.
60.
SwartzJames A., HsiehChang-ming, and BaumohlJim (in press). Disability benefits, drug use, and representative payment: An analysis of the relationships.Addiction.
61.
SwartzJames A. and MartinovichZoran (2003). General course and correlates of improvement and decline following termination of the Supplemental Security Income category for drug addiction and alcoholism.Contemporary Drug Problems,30: 425–454.
62.
SwartzJames A., MartinovichZoran, and GoldsteinPaul (2003). An analysis of the criminogenic effects of terminating the Supplemental Security Income impairment category for drug addiction and alcoholism.Contemporary Drug Problems,30: 391–424.
63.
SwartzJames A., TonkinPeggy, and BaumohlJim (2003). The methodology of the multi-site study of the termination of Supplemental Security Income benefits for drug addicts and alcoholics.Contemporary Drug Problems,30: 77–121.
64.
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means, Exploring Means of Achieving Higher Rates of Treatment and Rehabilitation Among Alcoholics and Drug Addicts Receiving Federal Disability Benefits, February 10, 1994 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994), Serial 103–75.
65.
WaldorfDan, ReinarmanCraig, and MurphySheigla (1991). Cocaine Changes: The Experience of Using and Quitting.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
66.
WeirMargaret (1992). Politics and Jobs.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
WhiteWilliam L. (1998). Slaying the Dragon: The History of Addiction Treatment and Recovery in America.Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems/Lighthouse Institute.
68.
WisemanJacqueline P. (1971). Stations of the Lost: The Treatment of Skid Row Alcoholics.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
69.
YoungNancy K. (2000). Integrating Substance Abuse Treatment and Vocational Services. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 38. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
