Rules or Values? Production of Knowledge and the Question of Institutionalization in European Drug Cooperation

Abstract

The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) has a significant role in the creation of a European knowledge base in the drugs field. This article analyzes the regulative, cognitive and normative mechanisms by which this network functions, and discusses in what sense these mechanisms contribute to an institutionalization process in the network. A study among civil servants and experts with EMCDDA experience from Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands shows that action within the network is based on rules and routines. The national administrative surroundings are still the primary source of identification and constitute the main institutional basis for compliance. In this sense the national level supplies EMCDDA with institutional resources whereby the network functions. A common knowledge-base is an important part of integration in the EU, but in this instance the institutionalization process is in an early stage.

Keywords

Drugs cooperation European integration production of knowledge European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction institutionalization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Commission (1992): European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Feasibility study into information technology and networking. Phase III. Lisbon: EMCDDA.

Dehousse

(1997): Regulation by networks in the European Community: The role of European agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 4:246–261.

Desrosières

(1990): How to make things which hold together: Social science, statistics and the state, in Wagner

Wittrock

and Withley

, eds.: Discourses on Society: Volume XV, pp. 195–218. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

EEC No. 302/93: Council Regulation on the Establishment of a European Drugs Monitoring Centre and a European Information Network on Drugs and Drug Addiction (REITOX). Brussels: EEC.

Ekengren

and Sundelius

(1998): Sweden: The state joins the European Union, in Hanf

and Soetendorp

, eds.: Adapting to European Integration. Small States and the European Union. London and New York: Longman.

EMCDDA (1993): Inventory of EC (legal) texts on drugs. Commission of the European Communities. Lisbon: EMCDDA.

EMCDDA (1996): Annual Report on the State of the Drugs Problem in the European Union. European Communities 1996. Lisbon: EMCDDA.

EMCDDA (1997): Annual Report on the State of the Drugs Problem in the European Union. European Communities 1997. Lisbon: EMCDDA.

EMCDDA (1998): Annual Report on the State of the Drugs Problem in the European Union. European Communities 1998. Lisbon: EMCDDA.

10.

Fjær

(1998a): Forskning med forbudet som premiss. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, 1:152–167.

11.

Fjær

(1998b): Den Europeiske Union og narkotikapolitikken: Integrasjon gjennom kunnskapsproduksjon og kontroll. Nordisk alkohol- och narkotikatidsskrift, 15:262–277.

12.

Fjær

(2000): Between national loyalty and independent expertise. Current Politics and Economics of Europe, 10:149–166.

13.

Joerges

and Everson

(2000): Challenging the bureaucratic challenge, in Eriksen

E. O.

and Fossum

J. E.

, eds.: Democracy in the European Union—Integration Through Deliberation? London: Routledge.

14.

Kreher

(1997): Agencies in the European Community—a step toward the administrative integration in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 4:225–245.

15.

Majone

(1997): The new European agencies: Regulation by information. Journal of European Public Policy, 4:262–275.

16.

March

J.G.

and Olsen

J.P.

(1989): Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.

17.

Rothstein

(1992): Den korporativa staten. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.

18.

Scott

W.R.

(1995): Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage Publications.

19.

Selznick

(1957): Leadership in Administration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

20.

Shapiro

(1997): The problems of independent agencies in the United States and the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 4:276–291.

21.

VWS (1999): Drug Policy in the Netherlands. Progress report September 1997–September 1999. The Hague: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport.

22.

Weiler

J.H.H.

(1999): The transformation of Europe, in Weiler

J.H.H.

: The Constitution of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.