Following the reports on the Swiss heroin trials, Denmark has experienced a lengthy discourse on a possible Danish heroin experiment. Opponents have criticized the Swiss experiments on methodological grounds: they do not live up to rigid standards of scientific stringency, primarily the demands for a randomized clinical experiment (RCE). The article analyzes the basis for the Danish discourse, maintaining that the RCE design is not adequate for the relevant research questions. Instead, other types of scientific analyses might be applied, e.g., based upon self-selection. It is maintained that the scientific appearance of the discourse is in reality a disguise for moralistic political viewpoints, influenced by the war-on-drugs thinking, which is opposed to any harm-reduction measures that might raise fundamental questions about repressive drug policy. The background for the outcome of the Danish heroin discourse—as opposed to the Swiss and the Dutch—is analyzed in terms of differences in influences and ideology of the national medical “establishments.”
AshtonMike, “Rooftop protest as John Marks loses last clinic.”Druglink, ISDD, July/Aug. 1995, p. 4.
2.
ChristieNils & BruunKettil, Den gode fiende: Narkotikapolitikk i Norden (“The ideal enemy—drug policy in the Nordic countries”). Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1985.
3.
Dahler-EriksenKathrineDahler-EriksenBjarne SteenLassenJensen Flensted & OlesenFrede, Er det randomiserede forsøg overvurderet som klinisk beslutningsgrundlag? (Is the randomized controlled trial overvalued as a basis for clinical decision-making?)Ugeskrift for Lœger, 160/51, pp. 7414–7417, December 14, 1998.
4.
AlmindeligeDenDanske Lægeforening, Lægeforeningens Redegørelse om Narkotikapolitik (The Statement of the Danish Medical Association on Drug Policy). Ugeskrift for Lœger156/5, p. 670, 31 January 1994.
5.
EgePeter, Herointildeling—hvorfor nu det? (Heroin dispensing—why now?) In: EgeP., Stofmisbrug. Baggrund, konsekvenser, behandling, Copenhagen, 1997, pp. 107–127.
6.
EgePeter, Heroinforsøg (heroin trials). Ugeskrift for Lœger, 159/34. 6 April 1998.
7.
EgePeter, Heroinforsøg og WHO. Kommentar (Heroin trials and WHO. A comment). Ugeskrift for Lœger, Videnskab og Praksis, 1640, p. 5550, 1999.
8.
Folketinget: RetsudvalgetSocialudvalget, Sundhedsudvalget: Høring om lægelig ordinering af heroin til hårdt belastede narkomaner (Parliamentary hearing on medical prescription of heroin for severely dependent addicts). Folketingets Fællessal, 21 October 1998.
9.
GannikDorte & LaunsøLaila (eds.), Kontrollerede Kliniske Under-søgelser—forsvar, kritik og refleksioner (Controlled clinical trials —defense, critique and reflections). Netværk for Samfundsvidens-kabelig Sygdomsforskning, Copenhagen, 1996.
10.
GannikDorte, Subjektivitet og kontrollerede kliniske undersøgelser: Selvvalgsmetoden som model (Subjectivity and controlled clinical trials: Personal choice as model). In: Gannik & Launsø, 1996, pp. 37–49.
11.
GodtfredsenNanna, letter of April 27, 1998, to the Danish Narcotics Council on an opinion poll on a Danish heroin trial, published in Politiken (daily newspaper) by Vilstrup Research A/S on April 22, 1998.
12.
GodtfredsenNanna, personal communication on a 1999 public opinion poll, 2000.
13.
Health Council, The Netherlands, The prescription of heroin to heroin addicts. Sub-report from a committee of the Health Council of the Netherlands to the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sports (No. 1995/12E, The Hague, 8 June 1995).
14.
HumphreysKeith, and WeisnerConstance, “Use of exclusion criteria in selecting research subjects and its effect on the generalizability of alcohol treatment outcome studies.”American Journal of Psychiatry157:588–594, 2000.
15.
JärvinenM.JepsenJ.KreinerS. & SpannowK.E., Sociologisk Institut (K.U.), Center for Rusmiddelforskning (Aa.U.), Udtalelse til Socialministeriet: Vurdering af forsøg med heroin m.m. i Schweiz (PROVE) (Statement to the Ministry of Social Affairs. Evaluation of heroin trials etc. in Switzerland (PROVE)). Copenhagen & Aarhus, 1998.
16.
JepsenJörgen, Comments on joint statement to the Ministry of Social Affairs by the Institute of Sociology, University of Copenhagen and Centre for Alcohol and Drugs Research, with a note on the Swiss treatment system for drug addicts. University of Aarhus, February 2, 1998.
17.
JepsenJørgen, Notat Med Kommentar til Sundhedsstyrelsens udtalelse af 31. marts 1998 vedrørende “De schweiziske Heroin-forsøg m.v.” (Note with a comment to the Board of Health's statement of March 31, 1998 on the Swiss heroin trials). Aarhus, 16 April 1998.
18.
MetrebianNickyShanahanW.WellsB. & StimsonG.V., Feasibility of prescribing injectable heroin and methadone to opiate-dependent drug users: Associated health gains and harm reductions. Medical Journal of Australia, 168:596–600, 1998.
Narkotikarådet: Rapport fra Narkotikarådets Heroinarbejdsgruppe (Report from the Heroin Subcommittee of the Danish Narcotics Council). Narkotikarådet, August 1996.
21.
PedersenMads Uffe, Stofmisbrugere i døgnbehandling (Drug addicts in residential treatment). Delrapport 3, Center for Rusmiddelforskning, Aarhus, 1998.
22.
PedersenMads Uffe, Stofmisbrugere efter døgnbehandling (Drug addicts after residential treatment). Delrapport 5, Center for Rusmiddelforskning, Aarhus, 1999.
23.
PedersenSælan, Kringsholm, Stofmisbrugerdødsfald i Storkøbenhavn (Drug addicts' deaths in Greater Copenhagen). In: Dødsfald blandt Stofmisbrugere, stigning, stagnation, forandring. Sundhedsstyrelsen, Copenhagen, 1996.
24.
PedersenTorben, Statement to Politiken (daily), February 5, 1998, on the drug policy of the Danish Medical Association.
25.
PernegerThomas V.GinerFrancisco, Miguel del Rio & Annie Mino, Randomised trial of heroin maintenance programme for addicts who fail in conventional drug treatments. British Medical Journal, 13–18 (4 July 1998).
26.
Politiken (Daily newspaper), “Narkotikapolitik splitter partier” (Drug policy splits parties) (Results of a Vilstrup research opinion poll), April 22, 1998.
27.
Proceedings of the InternationalConference on “Medical co-prescription of heroin to heroin addicts: State of the art and future directions.” Utrecht, the Netherlands, 3–4 July 1998.
28.
RaschkePeter, Substitutionstherapie. Ergebnisse langfristiger Behandlung von Opiatabhängigen. Lambertus Verlag, Freiburg i. Br., pp. 406–408, 1994.
29.
Rihs-MiddelM. (ed.), The Medical Prescription of Narcotics. Scientific Foundations and Practical Experiences. English edition edited by LewisD.GearC.Läubli LoudM.Langenick-CartwrightD. Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, Bern, Switzerland. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, 1997.
30.
SælanHenrik & EgePeter, Udlevering af heroin. Ugeskrifl for lœger, 159/34, 18 August 1998.
31.
SchmidtDorrit, Heroinforsøgene i Schweiz—alternativ til hvad? (The Swiss heroin trials—alternatives to what?) In: Narkotics Council's paperStof, no. 4, pp. 4–8, January 1998.
32.
SchoemakerBernadetteSchoemakerBernadette, “Health Council in favour of medical experiment: Treatment with heroin.”Jellinek Quarterly, 2 July 1995, pp. 2–3.
33.
ScocozzaLone, Det kontrollerede forsæg—en videnskabsteoretisk kritik (Controlled clinical trials—a scientific-theoretical critique). In Gannik & Launsø, 1996, pp. 51–66.
34.
SörensenH.J.HaastrupS. & JepsenP.W., Dödeligheden i en gruppe af 300 intravenöse københavnske stofmisbrugere (mortality in a group of 300 intravenous Copenhagen drug abusers). In: Dödsfald blandt stofmisbrugere—stigning, stagantion, forandring. Sundhedsstyrelsen, Cph, no date.
35.
SpannowKaren Ellen, Narkomanbehandling i England. Rapport fra Merseyside (Liverpool) (Treatment of Addicts in England …). Arbejdspapir, Center for Rusmiddelforskning, Aarhus, (no date).
36.
StorgaardAnette & LaursenLau, Konstruktionen af dansk narkotikakontrolpolitik siden 1965 (The Construction of Danish Drug Policy since 1965). København: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 2000.
37.
StrangJohn & GossopMichael, “Heroin prescribing in the British system: Historical review.”European Addiction Research, 1996:2, pp. 185–193.
38.
Sundhedsstyrelsen, Brev af 31. marts 1998 til Sundhedsministeriet vedrørende de schweiziske Heroin-forsøg m.v. (Letter of March 31, 1998, to the Danish Ministry of Health, presenting an evaluation of the Swiss heroin trials).
39.
UichtenhagenA.GutzwillerF. & Dobler-MikolaA. (eds.), Versuche für eine Ärtzliche Verschreibung von Betäubungsmitteln. Abschlussbericht der Forschungsbeauftragten, Synthesebericht. Zürich, June 1997.
40.
UchtenhagenA.Dobler-MikolaA.SteffenT.GutzwillerF.Rihs-MiddelM., Prescription of Narcotics for Heroin Addicts. Main Results of the Swiss National Cohort Study. Vol. 1. Karger, 1999.
41.
WHO, Report of the External Panel on the Evaluation of the Swiss Scientific Studies of Medically Prescribed Narcotics to Drug Addicts. Geneva, WHO, 1999.
