A comparative study of women's and men's levels of self evolvement was conducted based on Kegan's Constructive-Developmental Theory [1]. The samples for the study were drawn from groups of American women and men in military service in Europe and their dependents, as well as civilians employed by the American military. The participants level of self evolvement was determined by Kegan's Subject-Object Interview. The results indicated that there were no gender differences in levels of self evolvement. Hence, the orientation toward individuation and increased autonomy, which is stereotypically masculine, and the orientation toward attachment and dependence, which is stereotypically feminine, are not necessarily based on innate male or female characteristics. The tendency towards separateness or inclusion may be related more to individual differences and other factors such as the social and cultural environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KeganR., The Evolving Self, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982.
2.
FreudS., The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmond Freud, The Hagarth Press, London, Vol. XXI, 1931.
3.
EriksonE. H., Identity, Youth and Culture, NortonW. W., New York, 1968.
4.
EriksonE. H., Adulthood, W.W. Norton, New York, 1978.
5.
PiagetJ., The Moral Judgment of the Child, The Free Press, New York, 1932.
6.
KohlbergL., Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Development Approach to Socialization, inHandbook of Socialization Theory and Research, GoslinD.A., (ed.), Rand McNally, Chicago, 1969.
7.
KohlbergL., Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive Developmental Approach, inMoral Development and Behavior, LickonaT., (ed.), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1976.
8.
LevinsonD. J., The Seasons of a Man's Life, Knopf, New York, 1978.
9.
GilliganC., In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982.
10.
MillerJ. B., Toward a New Psychology of Women, Beacon Press, Boston, 1976.
11.
ChodorowN., The Reproduction of Mothering, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1978.
12.
LyonsN. P., Two Perceptions on Self, Relationships, and Morality,Harvard Educational Review, 53:2, pp. 125–145,1983.
13.
BelenkyM., ClincheB., GoldbergerN., and TruleJ., Women's Way of Knowing, Basic Books, New York, 1986.
14.
GilliganC., and AttanucciJ., Sex Differences and Moral Development,Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34:4, pp. 451–456,1988.
15.
KohlbergL., and KramerR., Continuities and Discontinuities in Child and Adult Moral Development,Human Development, 12, pp. 93–120, 1969.
16.
BaumrindD., Sex Differences in Moral Reasoning: Response to Walker's Conclusion That There Are None,Child Development, 57:2, pp. 511–521, 1986.
17.
StillerN.J., and ForrestL., An Extension of Gilligan and Lyon's Investigation of Morality: Gender Differences in College Students,Journal of College Students Development, 31:1, pp. 54–63, 1990.
18.
DonenbergG.R., and HoffmanL. W., Gender Differences in Moral Development,Sex Roles, 15:11–12, 701–717,1988.
19.
WalkerL. J., Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical Review,Child Development, 55, pp. 677–691,1984.
20.
WalkerL. J., Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Rejoinder to Baumrind,Child Development, 57:2, pp. 522–526,1986.
21.
WalkerL. J., Experiential and Cognitive Sources of Moral Development in Adulthood,Human Development, 29:2, pp. 113–124,1986.
22.
WalkerL. J., Moral Stages and Moral Orientation in Real Life,Child Development, 58:3, pp. 842–858,1987.
23.
WalkerL. J., Longitudinal Study of Moral Development,Child Development, 60:1, pp. 157–166,1989.
24.
LiftonP. D., Individual Differences in Moral Development: The Relation of Sex, Gender, and Personality to Morality: Special Issues Conceptualizing in Personality Theory and Research,Journal of Personality, 53:2, pp. 306–334,1985.
25.
ThomasS., Estimating Gender Differences in Comprehension and Preference of Moral Issues,Developmental Review, 6:2, pp. 165–180,1985.
26.
PrattM.W., and RayerJ. M., When Rights and Responsibilities Don't Mix: Sex and Sex Role Patterns in Moral Judgement Orientation,Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 14:3, pp. 190–204,1982.
27.
PrattM. W., GoldingG., HunterW., and SampsonR., Sex Differences in Adult Moral Orientation>, Journal of Personality, 56:2, pp. 373–391,1988.
28.
PrattM. W., GoldingG., HunterW., and MorrisJ., From Inquiry to Judgement: Age and Sex Difference in Patterns of Adult Moral Thinking and Information Seeking,International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 27:2, pp.109–124,1988.
29.
BoldizerJ., WilsonK. L., and DeemerD. K., Gender, Life Experiences and Moral Development: A Process Oriented Approach,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57:2, pp. 229–238,1989.
30.
WhiteC. B., Age, Education and Sex Effects on Adult Moral Reasoning,International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 27:4, pp. 271–281,1988.
31.
StackC. B., The Culture of Gender: Women and Men of Color,Signs, 11:2, pp. 321–324,1986.
32.
BarA.,-Yam, Interpersonal Development in Young Adulthood, Unpublished Dissertation, Boston University, 1988.
33.
BarA.,-Yam, Stages of Interpersonal Development in Young Adulthood, Paper presented at the American Psychological Association convention, New Orleans, Summer, 1989.
34.
MunekataH., and NinomiyaK., The Development of Prosocial Moral Judgement,Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 33:2, pp. 157–164,1985.
35.
SinghR. S., Study of Certain Moral Functions in Relation to Some Demographic Factors,Indian Psychological Review, 20:3, pp. 7–12,1981.
36.
SahooM. K., Moral Reasoning of Urban and Rural High School Students,Perspectives in Psychological Researches, 8:1, pp. 6–9,1985.
37.
ParkJ.Y., and LeeJ. H., A Study on Students' Moral Judgement,Korean Journal of Psychology, 3:3, pp. 159–171,1982.
38.
KahnJ. V., Moral Reasoning in Irish Children and Adolescents as Measured by the Defining Issues Test,Irish Journal of Psychology, 5:2, pp. 96–108,1982.
39.
EppelE.M., and EppelM., Adolescence and Morality: A Study of Some Moral Values of Working Adolescents in the Context of a Changing Climate of Opinion, Rutledge and PaulK., London, 1966.
40.
MusgraveP. W., The Moral Values of Some Australian Adolescents: A Report and Discussion,Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 20:2, pp. 197–217, 1984.
41.
BarM.,-Yam, KohlbergL., and NaameA., Moral Reasoning of Students in Different Cultural, Social, and Educational Settings,American Journal of Education, 88:3, pp. 345–362,1980.
42.
BarM.,-Yam and AvrahamiA., Sex and Age Difference in Moral Development of Kibbutz Members, Paper presented at the Bi-Annual Conference of the International Society for the Study of Behavior Development, Toronto, Canada, 1981.
43.
LuriaZ., A Methodological Critique,Signs, 11:2, pp. 316–321,1986.
44.
GreeC.G., no and MaccobyE. E., How Different Is the Different Voice?,Signs, 11:2, pp. 310–316,1986.
45.
SmetanaJ. G., Morality and Gender: A Commentary on Pratt, Golding, and Hunter,Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 30:4, pp. 341–348,1984.
46.
GilliganC., On in a Different Voice, An Interdisciplinary Forum: Reply, Signs, 11:2, pp. 324–333,1986.
